Blockading Territories

Suggestions that have been archived.

Moderator: Community Team

Post Reply

Should there be blockading territories

Yes
1
33%
No
2
67%
 
Total votes: 3

Emperor_Metalman
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 5:45 pm

Blockading Territories

Post by Emperor_Metalman »

There should be certain territories for which it would be necessary to control a "blockading" territory in order to attack/fortify. For example, if territory A and B were regular territories and territory C was a blockading territory, it would be necessary for one to control territory C in order to attack/foritfy from territory A to territory B.

Why blockading territories should be implemented
#1To accurately simulate naval warfare and the idea that an army can't cross a body of water dominated by enemy ships.

#2 De-facto truces. If Player 1 controls territory A and has 500 armies on it while Player 2 leaves only one army on territory B while he has 500 armies on territory C, there would be a De-facto truce. It would be more difficult for Player 1 and 2 to attack each other because they would need to fortify their armies or spend several turns building up in order to attack each other. De-facto truces would allow players to more easily focus on attacking a specific target instead of trying to play a build game.

I am thinking about making a Pacific ocean map based on blockading territorities if they are implemented
User avatar
spiesr
Posts: 2809
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 10:52 am
Location: South Dakota

Post by spiesr »

You would need to go to the map foundry for this to happen...
Post Reply

Return to “Archived Suggestions”