Skittles! wrote:You jumped in to vote for Kalish, to get rid of him, presumably. Sure ML made good evidence, but they both refuted the claims well enough for most people to unvote them.
Are you sure? Because I am not!
Neutrino wrote:Anyways, now that I have had time to read properly, I think I'll swap my priority around. Lovo, rather than Kalish. Unvote: Vote: LoVo He claims to have always been for either lifesaver's lynch or replacement, but I didn't see much evidence of the latter.
Of course, I've never been one for killing someone while they're not present, so I don't think we'll make much headway on that front. Who else would make a decent lynch...?
Was that a question or a response? Because its saying like, "lets lynch him because we won't be able to find a better person to lynch"!
diddle wrote:He says he persuaded Fircoal to replace him. We cannot be sure, but anyway, LV was cleared awhile ago.
I do not think saying "To clear myself I'll have to out a power role" classifies as being "cleared". He would only be "cleared" when a confirmed cop declares him innocent and the likes. I generally follow the rule of "Guilty until proven innocent" in mafia.
nagerous wrote:Sorry for lack of posting. I will re-read and make a big post tomorrow.
Still waiting!
Neutrino wrote:I'd be able to devote more energy in that direction if I wern't constantly dodging bullets...
Were you referring to the in-game bullets?
kalishnikov wrote:Well, I didn't really want to do it yet but this game has been kinda dragging the last few days so lets put alittle more pressure on Neut and see what he's got to say.
Unvote, vote: Neutrino
Major BS here. He had posted just a few posts above and after his posts on the prvious page no new arguments were raised. So how is he supposed to talk more? It seems you were biding your time to vote for him until the votes come close to lynch and then pass off your vote as blaming him for not posting enough. And thus you get an
FOS
MountainLion wrote:IF, and that's an if, Neut is a roleblocker, then LSU may be more likely to be town than otherwise. Why? Because there were what, 4 kills with 1 hider on night 1? It would seem that there were enough kills to go around, so IF LSU was blocked, he may be more likely to be innocent. Just a thought...what do you guys think?
May I point out that Fircoal loves killing roles. So its safe to assume that there are more than 4/5 killing roles in this game.
kalishnikov wrote:Well, I could take the time to go through those miscellaneous quotes by you crab and reply to each with care, or I could just say screw it and let you come to any conclusions that you like about that.
Maybe I'm scum, maybe I'm not; honestly though based on my play this game I'd say I'm a SK, possibly third party playing the low-key townie role.
Your questions toward me are inane, it would be just as relevant to answer a 'top 10 favorites' question then yours right now. They're all pointless answers that prove nothing about nothing. It's not worth the time, to be honest, think I'm scum if you must...
Oh and I don't skim, if I'm not sober (which I am regularly) I have been known to miss things, but I very rarely skim.
None of my questions have been answered and you have out up no defense either because of lack of interest or you are afraid we might catch a scum!