diddle wrote:I think I'm close to a lynch, so here's my claim. I am E.B Farnum (mayor). Obviously a pro-town role, so a waste of a lynch.
Does it matter whether or not I'm an important character. I've told you my role so its up to you to decide whether or not you want to lynch me.
It's important because major characters are likely to be in the game and therefore less likely to be used in a fake claim. Mayor alone is just obscure enough that it might be fake, but it seems your mr. Farnum is a main character, and therefore I'm going to assume you're telling the truth until someone counterclaims.
Unvote.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
That's actually fine with me too. I was browsing the mafiascum forums today and I came upon a very interesting remark about jesters. So what if he's a jester and we lynch him? It's not like the game would end. It would be just like winning with a survivor still being alive.
Everyone posting there also agreed that jesters/kamikazes are an abomination to the game of mafia and should never be used, except maybe in games with an open setup. And I agree with them. Please take note of that if anyone was planning of putting one in a future game.
Sierra_Leon wrote:That's actually fine with me too. I was browsing the mafiascum forums today and I came upon a very interesting remark about jesters. So what if he's a jester and we lynch him? It's not like the game would end. It would be just like winning with a survivor still being alive.
Everyone posting there also agreed that jesters/kamikazes are an abomination to the game of mafia and should never be used, except maybe in games with an open setup. And I agree with them. Please take note of that if anyone was planning of putting one in a future game.
I concur... Jesters are stupid and pointless and I despise them.
In any case. If you guys want to go for a bandwagon, I'm there.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Reading back, the only thing that really stood out is a couple pages ago, SL was playing the role of "overly helpful townie" with his summary of what nag did. I believe diddle's claim but nothing else struck me as odd.
kwanton wrote:Hrm. So what do you guys want me to say then?
Reading back, the only thing that really stood out is a couple pages ago, SL was playing the role of "overly helpful townie" with his summary of what nag did. I believe diddle's claim but nothing else struck me as odd.
We want you to play.
We want you to contribute.
We want you to post more than once every few days.
See, the problem is that you will post that one post and then disappear again.
I won't vote you if you are active, but this is proving that you have been reading and keeping up with the thread. So why no posting?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I'll admit that previously my strategy was to submarine, but even then I was still contributing. Actually overcontributing in the second half of my games to take control of any players who were still alive.
But now I'm actually finding it hard to find the time to get on and read. Ask ga7, fir, nag, skoff, and Co. I'm hardly even on MSN anymore. My games have actually dwindled too. I'm around 6 or so. I usually sign on for maybe half an hour a day to check up on things but your best bet to see me posting is on tuesdays or thursdays when I don't have class. Between classes, sleep, socializing, and possibly pledging to a frat I'm having little time for CC these days.
I was actually gonna try to keep this under wraps but after 7 deadly sins is done I'm gonna stop playing mafia for a while. Ah well....
On to game related stuff. There is not much for me to say that hasn't already been said. The only person who strikes me as suspicious is SL.
First, whenever anyone gives a summary like he did it strikes me as odd. Like they are trying to be a little too helpful. Secondly, it seems like he is a little too eager to point fingers. Even if you don't decide to lynch him, keep an eye on him. there's something odd about the way he's acting.
So, guys, we going to bandwagon every person until the entire town has claimed? I think its ridiculous that Koesen is leading the Spanish Inquisition and people are just keeping quiet no matter how many times he's wrong.
I was waiting to see how the diddle wagon turned out, but as soon as he claimed Koesie just started another wagon. Even if he's town, (which I seriously doubt at this point), he's still causing more harm than good.
Vote Koesen
<>---------------------------<> ......Come play CC Mafia, .....where happiness lies <>----------[Link]----------<>
F1fth wrote:So, guys, we going to bandwagon every person until the entire town has claimed? I think its ridiculous that Koesen is leading the Spanish Inquisition and people are just keeping quiet no matter how many times he's wrong.
I was waiting to see how the diddle wagon turned out, but as soon as he claimed Koesie just started another wagon. Even if he's town, (which I seriously doubt at this point), he's still causing more harm than good.
Vote Koesen
1. Let's compare voting records. You lynched one confirmed townie. I lynched none.
2. Let's count the number of my votes that have been proven beyond any doubt to be wrong: none.
3. Let's count the number of bandwagons I pushed after the accused claimed: none.
4. Let's count the number of bandwagons I started "as soon as Diddle claimed": none.
I go after submariners and I get them to talk. That is not 'causing harm' and I don't apologize for it.
kalishnikov wrote: Damn you Koesen. (I know you're reading this)
F1fth wrote:So, guys, we going to bandwagon every person until the entire town has claimed? I think its ridiculous that Koesen is leading the Spanish Inquisition and people are just keeping quiet no matter how many times he's wrong.
I was waiting to see how the diddle wagon turned out, but as soon as he claimed Koesie just started another wagon. Even if he's town, (which I seriously doubt at this point), he's still causing more harm than good.
Vote Koesen
Whoo! Another bandwagon to jump! but, seriously now... that makes a lot of sense. Unfortuantely it's the same reason we lynched Clive (1.0). I don't know if following this kind of logic is anymore helpful... Oh well! unvote vote koesen
Just because you only made attempts to lynch several townies, you're in the clear? No, you're not. Seriously, I haven't seen you do anything to suggest that you aren't scum. And just because you were not stupid enough to lynch a probable townie does not prove you innocent, buddy.
And what do you mean you haven't started any bandwagons after diddle?
What is this?
Koesen wrote:In hiding, like many others. Want to switch the bandwagon to him?
And hey, I'm doing the same thing as you: getting information, and I'm not sorry for it either. I call scummy where I seem scummy behavior.
<>---------------------------<> ......Come play CC Mafia, .....where happiness lies <>----------[Link]----------<>
Alright, that's it. Clive, you are officially an idiot. You started day 2 off by spamming the board until gimpy let you back in then you made one or two very uneeded comments. Now, you again vote a person because other people are doing it, but most importantly this the the third person you've voted for without giving a reason on day two. Congrats, you earned my vote! Vote - - - Clive
If you want to play then play, but stop acting like scum and jumping onboard any player that gets voted.
Talapus wrote:Alright, that's it. Clive, you are officially an idiot. You started day 2 off by spamming the board until gimpy let you back in then you made one or two very uneeded comments. Now, you again vote a person because other people are doing it, but most importantly this the the third person you've voted for without giving a reason on day two. Congrats, you earned my vote! Vote - - - Clive
If you want to play then play, but stop acting like scum and jumping onboard any player that gets voted.
Ouch!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Now watch him run back in here with some BS defense and arguement as to why he is playing that way. It certainly didn't save him day one and he got voted for doing the same type of things. Shape up Clve...
Talapus wrote:Now watch him run back in here with some BS defense and arguement as to why he is playing that way. It certainly didn't save him day one and he got voted for doing the same type of things. Shape up Clve...
