multiple scum targets can we pick one please people
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
anyway, my two cents. I did a bit of rechecking. To me I thought it was pretty obvious that Kiwi was the sane cop, so I'm going to Fos all those who said otherwise. Reason being is with the doubt scum could easily enough used that to get the town into thinking he was the fake or nonuseless cop, so I believe one scum was atleast apart of that. Diddle just so happened to be one of them, and on the early stages of kiwi coming out leading to the death of our sane cop.
Dustn I believe to be town, looking at the same thing Dustn actually came to the defence of both Brown and kiwi, pointing out that both are likely town. Seeing as in that circumstance scum could easily knock out atleast one of them why would he defend them instead? Of course if could be a cunning ploy, but not as likely.
So vote diddle
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Anyway, I agree with skoffin. Exactly for that reason I questioned him but he avoided giving the answer and has time and again taken the submarining route. Scummy behaviour to the max.
unvote vote diddle
rebelman wrote:
JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:thats why my next wife will be a player from this site. I wont mention who
obviously you are looking for a woman thats a good cook and likes you to dominate in one on one
I say we give brown 1 more chance with an investigation tonight. We need to tell him who to investigate. I will willingly be investigated if needs be or we can investigate a possible scum, but this could backfire if brown himself is scum and they trick us into thinking they are both town.
Regarding dustn, I think he is scummy. The "i'll reread" post ,I think, is trying to make us think he will try to help us when really he will look for scummy townies. I'll unvote but leave it at fos.
Now diddle. Questioning the sanity of a surely sane cop. Telling us to carry on with the SL kiwi and brown triangle. His unconvincing defence. vote diddle
Sierra_Leon wrote:let me repost what I said about dustn64 some 10 pages ago:
Dustn64 - First to vote me after browng's claim. Keeps pressuring me for no apparent reason even after I claimed. Later votehops from fireedud to kiwi.
This was referring to his behaviour on pages 12, 13, and 16.
His only post after that was: "Quit stalling" directed at browng just before he gave his role name. No response to my accusations. No new opinions or theories. He's been posting plenty in other games. It looks to me like he's laying low in fear of getting busted.
I kept pressuring you because we need to find out the sanity of the cop that investigated you and got scum. It is kind of like if you are starving and stumble across food, then you push it to the side and keep walking. Why not try it to see if it fills a void? Any other questions?
rebelman wrote:
CrabNebula wrote:I agree with Sierra here on dustn. He was pushing for browng's lynch and became rather quiet on being asked to respond. Also I have reasonable proof that browng is not mafia.
So unvote vote dustn
based on the last two posts although im curious about this evidence crab has
unvote vote dutn
this is the second post after SL made his vote on me. he pointlessly joined a small bandwagon that could eventually grow into a lynch.
rebelman wrote:multiple scum targets can we pick one please people
Here, yet again, he is pretty much saying "Who are we going to bandwagon on now? Because I am going to jump on one once it starts." Vote Rebelman
Well, I'm on l-4, so I won't claim yet, but I can safely say that I wasn't submarining. I had read Crabs post, asking for an answer (which MM provided) and then had to log off, and I didn't return until now. As far as I understand, you can't submarine if you're not online.