Im not going to vote just yet as there isnt really much evidence although if a deadline is put and hes still scummiest(which I suppose he is) then I shall vote
grrrr i try to progress this game and i become a target there are a few scummy targets out there yet you get a wagon rolling on me (with zero evidence), I'd expect more from the experienced players - also my vote logic was explained at length and not leaped but as everyone around here seems to skim instead of read that was clearly missed.
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Sierra_Leon wrote:With skoffin standing up for dustn, I'll give him a chance. Let's see where this road takes us.
Unvote, vote rebelman.
I'm not standing up for anyone, I'm trying to get Diddle lynched
I think the 'evidence' on Rebelman is weak, and I do not understand why people are just jumping on him now when nothing significant has come up. There has been more said about other players, so why the sudden bandwagon?
Now lynch Diddle people, you know you want to.
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
CrabNebula wrote:I agree with Sierra here on dustn. He was pushing for browng's lynch and became rather quiet on being asked to respond. Also I have reasonable proof that browng is not mafia.
So unvote vote dustn
based on the last two posts although im curious about this evidence crab has
unvote vote dutn
this is the second post after SL made his vote on me. he pointlessly joined a small bandwagon that could eventually grow into a lynch.
rebelman wrote:multiple scum targets can we pick one please people
Here, yet again, he is pretty much saying "Who are we going to bandwagon on now? Because I am going to jump on one once it starts." Vote Rebelman
if you are going to quote me make sure you at least heAR my logic, LOOK AT ALL MY POSTS THIS DAY and not revenge vote ala day 1 which seems to have convinced a troop of players too lazy to read this thread. The second quote above was in response to what looked like a np lynch when there are scummy targets, im not one !! and we already had a no lynch and so far in this game we have only killed one scum !!
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Sierra_Leon wrote:With skoffin standing up for dustn, I'll give him a chance. Let's see where this road takes us.
Unvote, vote rebelman.
I'm not standing up for anyone, I'm trying to get Diddle lynched
I think the 'evidence' on Rebelman is weak, and I do not understand why people are just jumping on him now when nothing significant has come up. There has been more said about other players, so why the sudden bandwagon?
Now lynch Diddle people, you know you want to.
diddle is one possible target of several - as I posted earlier i want us to start eliminating scum but surely we can do this on the back of convincing arguments, thankfully skoffin can tell the difference between real evidence and a paper thin bandwagon - can people please think/act more like her so we can get back in control of this game as scum are walking away with it at the moment.
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Skoffin wrote: We? You mean the vig did, so far we town are failing hard at the lynching part <<
NEED MOAR ACTION GUIS SRSLY
true
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
Looks like rebelman was just being desperate rather than scummy. In any case, best to keep an eye on him.
Also, I'm fish-slapping an FOS on Skoffin because she's blatently using personal prejudices to try and get poor old diddle lynched.
...What? What personal prejudices? What are you on about man?
I'm tempted to vote Lala for the excuse 'There's nothing else to do and no new leads-even-though-I-haven't-looked so I think bandwagoning and doing nothing is acceptable lalallala' however I won't, because Diddle is still alive.
WHY PEOPLE WHY?
Everything confuses and enrages me! Raaaargh Join Discord groupfor multiplayer gaming and general nonsense.
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
Looks like rebelman was just being desperate.
didn't realise my love life was being discussed on this thread
Don't now why people on here don't like being cooks, remember under siege: A former SEAL, now cook, is the only person who can stop a gang of terrorists when they sieze control of a US Navy battleship.
Minister Masket wrote:UNVOTE
Looks like rebelman was just being desperate rather than scummy. In any case, best to keep an eye on him.
Also, I'm fish-slapping an FOS on Skoffin because she's blatently using personal prejudices to try and get poor old diddle lynched.
...What? What personal prejudices? What are you on about man?
I'm tempted to vote Lala for the excuse 'There's nothing else to do and no new leads-even-though-I-haven't-looked so I think bandwagoning and doing nothing is acceptable lalallala' however I won't, because Diddle is still alive.
WHY PEOPLE WHY?
She isn't using personal prejudices, well, not that I know of. She just appears to have a vendetta.