Gozar wrote:The accent is in a different place on Quebec between the map and the legend.
iancanton wrote:labrador's lack of significance means it ought to be only one territory
Poor Labrador.....
I am sure it is quite significant to some people.
true, although i’m sure that PEI is significant to even more people, in fact four times as many as labrador, yet PEI has only one territory to labrador's four. poor old PEI! anne of green gables must be turning in her grave at this favouritism toward labrador. in war, labrador, with only 15,000 male residents of all ages, would be incapable of raising a significant army. that’s one reason why it’s appropriate for labrador to be one single territory, so that it starts with the same number of armies as PEI instead of four times as many armies.
Lone.prophet wrote:labrador is as important as the rest
as explained above, it’s not four times as important as PEI.
Lone.prophet wrote:in the canada map labrador also isnt the same region as newfoundland
two wrongs don't make a right: if u keep separating them on every map, then some people will start to think of it as being actual fact. since newfoundland & labrador is a single province, it ought to be one continent. i'm seeing no overriding gameplay reason to split it into two. this is unlike quebec province, which is split into three continents (is four being suggested now?) because it is otherwise too big. with newfoundland & labrador as one continent of four territories, this map will, like the classic map, have three large continents the size of classic europe or north america and three small continents similar in size to classic south america.
the whole area covered by this map can be called either eastern canada or quebec & atlantic canada, though i think there’s nothing wrong with the gulf of st lawrence name. any of these three names is good.
ian.
