[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Comments: leeports is playing yellow....I see a note to me from joelee (who isn't even in the game) in game chat after I (pink) attacked yellow...complaining that WE WILL LOSE if I keep attacking him...open and shut case I think...LOL Why else would joelee say WE, when he isn't even in the game..unless he is also leeports??? Besides...both names contain LEE.....DUH )
<Rozebud>
Last edited by Rozebud on Sat Oct 07, 2006 8:21 am, edited 2 times in total.
that happens a lot, its no big deal. YOu say jolee wasnt even in the game. there have been many times that i have been watching a game that one of my FRIENDS was in and commenting on it. there is no reason to suspect anyone of anything. Plus, blue did have a good chance of winning if you continued to attack. you would have gotten too weak while he continued expanding.
I did at one point think that they were multis, but why would he log in under joelee, search into his game, and comment on it? He would be admitting it and this is not likely.
Children, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.
It is a bit weird, isn't it? But maybe this guy is in the habit of making alliance calls over PM, had them all lined up in his head and just sent them out...
Well, it's an interesting question anyway! What are the rules regarding "third party" secret alliances? If you get a friend to just bombard someone else with PMs like, "I think you should attack this other guy, and maybe my friend will let you keep your continent if you do (maybe... just my OPINION, you understand...)" then are they avoiding the letter of the law, if not the spirit?