greenoaks wrote:
oh my bad.
TRUE
greenoaks wrote:
you're referring to the evidence they had against Klobber
FALSE -- He's referring to the evidence against Oggiss.
greenoaks wrote:but were unable to prove he is a cheat with
TRUE -- I was found innocent of the false accusation.
greenoaks wrote:so grudgingly
FALSE -- There was no "grudge" involved in the process that found me to be 100% innocent of the false accusation. Not just one, but two moderators cheerfully announced in this forum that I was not cheating.
greenoaks wrote:had to clear him
FALSE -- They did not "have to" clear me. They willingly decided to clear me because they knew for a fact that I was not cheating, and that I win based on skill and superior intelligence.
greenoaks wrote:is now good enough to lynch Oggiss with.
TRUE -- The evidence against Oggiss is mounting, and the main difference is that I was never cheating and I was always 100% innocent of the false accusation, whereas Oggiss is actually a cheater, and he will be banned from the site soon.
In the meantime, nobody should join in any games with Oggiss.
TRUE
.