Moderator: Community Team
It isn't that I am upset for it being removed, I am upset for the complete and utter lack of logic under which it was removed. I mean saying that one of three players missing multiple turns is "trivial" is just about as dumb as it gets.poo-maker wrote:There are alot of people who share your thoughts on the feedback system- I am one of them. I wouldn't let it bother you that much, as noone really gives a damn about their opponents feedback as long as they haven't got a ridiculous ratio of positives to negatives.
The definition of occasional as stated by wicked is three. I got into an argument with her in another thread about this. If a player misses three turns in a four round game your feedback won't hold up. On the other hand if a player misses four turns in a one hundred round game, according to the declared standards, the feedback will stand...sideoutshu wrote:I left someone a negative saying they "missed multiple turns during a crucial point in the game" which was completely 100% true. Apparently, this guys complained about it and I get a message saying the feedback was removed becasue it was "trivial and not accurate".
Are you freaking kidding me? How is one player out of three remaining missing multiple turns "trivial"? Cause if that is trivial I would like to see what is "important". Christ, I have gotten negative feedback for telling someone they made a stupid move but something that actually effects the outcome is trivial? Gimme a break. Why not just get rid of the feedback section all together?
wow... if that is indeed true, it makes no sense. none... wow... thanks for that info.-0GabonX wrote:The definition of occasional as stated by wicked is three. I got into an argument with her in another thread about this. If a player misses three turns in a four round game your feedback won't hold up. On the other hand if a player misses four turns in a one hundred round game, according to the declared standards, the feedback will stand...

So there is a definitive rule, the fact it makes absoloutely no sense whatsoever is of little or no consequence. Lucky for us wicked always keeps to a this single standardised process, never deviating from a set position, never ever showing double standards, that way we all know where we are....don't we?GabonX wrote:The definition of occasional as stated by wicked is three. I got into an argument with her in another thread about this. If a player misses three turns in a four round game your feedback won't hold up. On the other hand if a player misses four turns in a one hundred round game, according to the declared standards, the feedback will stand...
neither do I...how did you manage it?owenshooter wrote:p.s.-what? you got in an argument with wicked? i don't believe that for one instant!
Unsuprisingly, wicked fails to read the thread.wicked wrote:Feedback Instructions wrote:Do not leave feedback for trivial things like missing an occasional turn.
This would be why you have left 5 odd pages of feedback then?oggiss wrote:Why do you guys whine about feedback system? Not many players give a shit about it
Fruitcake wrote:This would be why you have left 5 odd pages of feedback then?oggiss wrote:Why do you guys whine about feedback system? Not many players give a shit about it
Mind you, some of the feedbacks you left and received (of which there were nearly as many, interestingly) brought tears of laughter to my eyes.
don't try to reason OR understand The Oggiss... just marvel at whichever personality he possesses, decides to show up for the day or occassion or post...-0Fruitcake wrote: This would be why you have left 5 odd pages of feedback then?

That post just ruined your chances to get a forum moderatorowenshooter wrote:don't try to reason OR understand The Oggiss... just marvel at whichever personality he possesses, decides to show up for the day or occassion or post...-0Fruitcake wrote: This would be why you have left 5 odd pages of feedback then?
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
