'neutral' feedback rating

omniceribrus · Post by **omniceribrus** » Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:32 pm

Would it be possible to add a 'neutral' feedback catagory?

It should be fairly simple to implement, and sometimes I want to comment on games but dont want to praise or condemn the user.
The world is not in just black and white after all!

Priority - 3

Thanks!

Bad Speler · Post by **Bad Speler** » Mon Oct 09, 2006 1:39 pm

I agree, there have been times where I would have used this feature.

kc-jake · Post by **kc-jake** » Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:19 pm

I beat you to it...

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 400#116400

nyg5680 · Post by **nyg5680** » Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:43 pm

haha personally i think its a stupid idea cause if u hav a good and a bad feedbac either leave 2 or none at all

kc-jake · Post by **kc-jake** » Mon Oct 09, 2006 8:23 pm

nyg5680 wrote:haha personally i think its a stupid idea cause if u hav a good and a bad feedbac either leave 2 or none at all

People notice negative feedback over positive feedback. Please try again.

reverend_kyle · Post by **reverend_kyle** » Mon Oct 09, 2006 11:10 pm

kc-jake wrote:I beat you to it...

http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewto ... 400#116400

OOOOH fastposted.

I think its a good Idea although I haven't had a situation where i'd use it yet.

jay_a2j · Post by **jay_a2j** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 1:45 am

If they aren't a good player yet aren't a bad player there is no need for feedback.

Laskdjf · Post by **Laskdjf** » Tue Oct 10, 2006 8:09 pm

I like this idea, especially for use in an instance where a player repeatedly skips turns, but doesn't deadbeat. I find this incredibly annoying, and I know I'm not the only one. However, it has been determined that negative feedback should not be used in such an instance. I'm fine with that, but it would be helpful to have a method of labeling someone who employs this strategy, just so those who don't wish to play with someone like that can avoid them...