firth4eva wrote:Really? It would make it unbalanced? There's not that many jedi are there? And to be sure, this is based on the film right? The one where Anakin chooses to be Vader?
Anyway AD I am not scum. My character has been in all 6 movies I think and there is no doubt that he is town.
way to fly under the radar...that just seems like a statement that has no positive purpose.
firth4eva wrote:Really? It would make it unbalanced? There's not that many jedi are there? And to be sure, this is based on the film right? The one where Anakin chooses to be Vader?
Anyway AD I am not scum. My character has been in all 6 movies I think and there is no doubt that he is town.
way to fly under the radar...that just seems like a statement that has no positive purpose.
way to fly under the radar...that just seems like a statement that has no positive purpose
firth4eva wrote:Really? It would make it unbalanced? There's not that many jedi are there? And to be sure, this is based on the film right? The one where Anakin chooses to be Vader?
Anyway AD I am not scum. My character has been in all 6 movies I think and there is no doubt that he is town.
way to fly under the radar...that just seems like a statement that has no positive purpose.
way to fly under the radar...that just seems like a statement that has no positive purpose
Echo echo echo echo
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
got tonkaed wrote:firth for a guy who plays as often as you seem to, i dont understand why you havent really ever been that good.
This is like the third straight game ive seen you act in a way that would be very easy to charcterize as scummy.
maybe because he's scum? Really I don't see the evidence here. Though once again I can kinda see were Kalish is going with his logic...
Thats sort of my point...i dont really think firth has done anything in particular that is an out and out scum tell. But it seems like he is in love with making repeated posts that get on peoples nerves and that makes him a rather easy bandwagon target game in and game out.
got tonkaed wrote:firth for a guy who plays as often as you seem to, i dont understand why you havent really ever been that good.
This is like the third straight game ive seen you act in a way that would be very easy to charcterize as scummy.
maybe because he's scum? Really I don't see the evidence here. Though once again I can kinda see were Kalish is going with his logic...
Thats sort of my point...i dont really think firth has done anything in particular that is an out and out scum tell. But it seems like he is in love with making repeated posts that get on peoples nerves and that makes him a rather easy bandwagon target game in and game out.
ok, I see what you mean, and I agree, though I wouldn't lynch him for it.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
firth4eva wrote:Just the reaction I am looking for.
And GT, I know I'm not that good at mafia. Really I'm not.
I cant understand what that reaction is...are you trying to lay a trap for scum? Are you trying to get people to bandwagon on you? I mean if your getting what your looking for out of the posts, what exactly is that thing?
But tbh I cba with mafia now. I joined this because lovo is my friend and nvited me but my plan is to play the townie who risks it all to out some scum. Same with Fircoal's. But I'm really enjoyingnag's and I'm trying to stay alive so meh.
And about your post that you just posted, people think it is scummy but not scummy enough for a lynch. Anyone wo goes for it is obviously scum.
Damn you AD, when I say you look scummy your supposed to get all worked up and act scummy... You're not doing that very well at all...
And now I'll be the scummy one; I propose a no-lynch as we've got no good targets and nothing to go on. At this point in the deadline if we get a wagon a-rollin' there will be no stopping it and a quick thoughtless lynch will help the scum way more then a no-lynch, in a game of this size I can't imagine any more then 2 NKs so it won't put us in too much danger.
Granted we miss out on some info but I'd rather have a fruitless day 1 then a day 1 where we lynch an important power role under pressure from the deadline so we don't believe a legit claim.
This is unless someone can find a suitable target, which I doubt, because it probably would have happened by now.
kalishnikov wrote:Damn you AD, when I say you look scummy your supposed to get all worked up and act scummy... You're not doing that very well at all...
And now I'll be the scummy one; I propose a no-lynch as we've got no good targets and nothing to go on. At this point in the deadline if we get a wagon a-rollin' there will be no stopping it and a quick thoughtless lynch will help the scum way more then a no-lynch, in a game of this size I can't imagine any more then 2 NKs so it won't put us in too much danger.
Granted we miss out on some info but I'd rather have a fruitless day 1 then a day 1 where we lynch an important power role under pressure from the deadline so we don't believe a legit claim.
This is unless someone can find a suitable target, which I doubt, because it probably would have happened by now.
I would agree with this, but Clive has two posts...
Unvote
Vote: Clive
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
kalishnikov wrote:And now I'll be the scummy one; I propose a no-lynch as we've got no good targets and nothing to go on. At this point in the deadline if we get a wagon a-rollin' there will be no stopping it and a quick thoughtless lynch will help the scum way more then a no-lynch, in a game of this size I can't imagine any more then 2 NKs so it won't put us in too much danger.
I was this close to putting my vote back on you after reading your post, but I like having it on militant a bit longer. We still have 3 days I believe. That should be enough time to find a scumbag to lynch.
nagerous wrote:LSU and Frenchie have also posted 4 and 6 times, maybe they should be bolded too.
Oops, my bad. They should be bolded in that list too.
AD, why Clive and not Militant? I picked Militant myself because Clive posted he was having computer problems and that was the reason he was inactive so far. Militant didn't mention any such thing until I called him out for it.
Militant, if you've got the time could you tell us who you think is scum please?
nagerous wrote:LSU and Frenchie have also posted 4 and 6 times, maybe they should be bolded too.
Oops, my bad. They should be bolded in that list too.
AD, why Clive and not Militant? I picked Militant myself because Clive posted he was having computer problems and that was the reason he was inactive so far. Militant didn't mention any such thing until I called him out for it.
Militant, if you've got the time could you tell us who you think is scum please?
Sierra... I have a better question... Why are you not scum?
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:Unless they are Sierr'a scum friends and he was keeping the pressure off of them???
There goes my briliantly thought out plan..
And I'm not scum for the same reason I don't suspect you to be scum at this moment: I'm trying to catch scumbags by putting some pressure on people and seeing how they react. Unlike some people, who are just gliding by - posting now and then but not really contributing to the game. I think Militant belongs to that last category, that's why I'd like him to tell us who he thinks is scum.
Haha, both clive and militant have had time today to play about 1 hr - 2hrs worth of rt mafias with me on another website... WHOOPS? Did I just drop you guys in it???
Anarkistsdream wrote:Unless they are Sierr'a scum friends and he was keeping the pressure off of them???
There goes my briliantly thought out plan..
And I'm not scum for the same reason I don't suspect you to be scum at this moment: I'm trying to catch scumbags by putting some pressure on people and seeing how they react. Unlike some people, who are just gliding by - posting now and then but not really contributing to the game. I think Militant belongs to that last category, that's why I'd like him to tell us who he thinks is scum.
I just quickly re read the thread, and no one stands out as scum for me. Although i was a little suspicious of AD for the reason stated by kalish in this post:
kalishnikov wrote:Claiming Jedi in every other post, under no pressure, may have something to do with it...
Since he had two votes on him, i dont see that as a reason to claim. So Fos AD
Guys I am intentionally lurking. Discuss; Play mafia, it is good.
Oderint Dum Metuant says: Don't confuse the easily confused!