creative brushwork - artistrybryguy wrote:whats with the large blue/orange/pink spots on some places?
Moderator: Cartographers
creative brushwork - artistrybryguy wrote:whats with the large blue/orange/pink spots on some places?

i really don't understand what your on about? I don't see any issue with this.TaCktiX wrote:Escape Flugzeuge washes out with the part of the runway underneath it. Suggest removing that segment of runway doodad-ry to make that easier to read, especially considering it's part of the objective.

Sorry TaCktix, but is this really a monitor issue or do you really have a prob with this,,,i don't understand the bizzare artifacts directly coinciding bit...TaCktiX wrote:Yay for bizarre artifacts directly coinciding with where I was looking at your map. No problem there, my monitors are being weird.






You put up such a good point...i'll change it shortly. You're determined to change that top aren't you???!!!Incandenza wrote:Hey, cairns, how about something like this for the top text (I haven't forgotten, just been a bit busy):
"A fictional story from WWII. Storm Das Scholss and escape at the airport. The enemy will try and stop you!"
Yeah, it's basically the same, but given how you want to do this, the least I could do was clean up the sketchy grammar and lessen the qualifying adjectives at the top. Personally I think it could still be stronger, but you weren't a fan of my initial endeavors.
Also, with the text in the upper right, you might want to rework it so that it's:
"Objective of gameplay: capture and hold terit terit terit terit"
That way there's no confusion about having to hold each terit for a turn to achieve the objective.

Hey, I majored in english in college, so I'm a bit of a stickler for stuff like that.cairnswk wrote:You put up such a good point...i'll change it shortly. You're determined to change that top aren't you???!!!
i hope you give it many test drives.Incandenza wrote:Hey, I majored in english in college, so I'm a bit of a stickler for stuff like that.cairnswk wrote:You put up such a good point...i'll change it shortly. You're determined to change that top aren't you???!!!
Thanks for letting me be a pain in the ass, cairns. I'm definitely going to have to give this one a 1v1 testdrive when it goes live.

That would then explain why Gazala is little known compared to Waterloo. However, Gazala may prove to be much easier than Waterloo and certainly less lengthy a romp in the sack...Incandenza wrote:That'll depend on whether it turns out to be a waterloo or a gazala.... not to say that gazala's bad, necessarily, but... let me put it like this: gazala's a cute girl that's mediocre in the sack, whereas waterloo's a playboy playmate that's always inviting other playmates over for threesomes.



Are you saying that Gazala is easy... and Waterloo is playing hard to get?!cairnswk wrote:That would then explain why Gazala is little known compared to Waterloo. However, Gazala may prove to be much easier than Waterloo and certainly less lengthy a romp in the sack...Incandenza wrote:That'll depend on whether it turns out to be a waterloo or a gazala.... not to say that gazala's bad, necessarily, but... let me put it like this: gazala's a cute girl that's mediocre in the sack, whereas waterloo's a playboy playmate that's always inviting other playmates over for threesomes.

bu no means...simply the length of playing time.yeti_c wrote:Are you saying that Gazala is easy... and Waterloo is playing hard to get?!cairnswk wrote:That would then explain why Gazala is little known compared to Waterloo. However, Gazala may prove to be much easier than Waterloo and certainly less lengthy a romp in the sack...Incandenza wrote:That'll depend on whether it turns out to be a waterloo or a gazala.... not to say that gazala's bad, necessarily, but... let me put it like this: gazala's a cute girl that's mediocre in the sack, whereas waterloo's a playboy playmate that's always inviting other playmates over for threesomes.
C.

i think this has strayed from topic.....back on topic guys.bryguy wrote:i disagree, took me 3 games of waterloo to figure it out

bryguy wrote:QUENCH!!!!
These are the large and small adjusted versions of V24.bryguy wrote:yes back on topic
bryguy wrote:QUENCH!!!!


FixedForza AZ wrote:-Escape Flugzeuge on map is Escape Aircraft in XML
Total for 17 territories whould be +7. Does this require "an override" in the master listing?-In XML now for Flughaven you get 12 (7 for continent + 5 for 15 Flughaven territories). Is that meant to be so, or should the total bonus be 7?
Same answer.-Same question for Stadt, should the total bonus be 13 or 7?
In xml AA, AB, & AC are included but should not be there, Markt and Inn are missing. Fixed.-In the legend it says that Stadt has 21 territories, in the XML there are 22 and on the map 24 (Inn & Markt are not listed in the XML)
Can you check on this please?-Cable Cars, Roads, Batteries and Checkpoints are listed as continents with a bonus of 0. Is this correct? If so, then you should not have to list them in the XML I think.
Removed.-Bonus of AA is listed as 0 with territory CP4. Think this should not be there.
The checkpoints are group listed as a continent for 0 bonus, but then have individual bonus of -1 in the drop listing. So do we need to list a full continent grouping as per normal with bonus 0 if there is another bonus applied.-Checkpoints have both a normal bonus in XML and a “drop-bonus” of –1. Should they be there both or only 1 of them?
No should only be 8. You have included Lagerraum C in your list there, but that starts neutral. Fixed in the xml with 2 neutral.-9 territories in Das Schloss don’t have neutrals at the start in XML (Soldaten A, B & C, WC, Lagerraum A, B & C, Speiseraum, Hauptsitz A) . Is that correct?
Fixed.-In borders of Markt, Kom Wilhelm is missing
That is correct. This map is purely an objective map, therefore terminator games shouldn't be possible. Does this present a problem? The only way around this is to have AA, AB, & AC able to take-out the parachutes.And is it correct that it is impossible to eliminate opponents in this map, since you can’t attack the 8 parachutes?????

Well, it's not really a mistake if you have continents which give a bonus of 0 in the XML, but it just takes space, while they are of no use I believe.cairnswk wrote:Can you check on this please?-Cable Cars, Roads, Batteries and Checkpoints are listed as continents with a bonus of 0. Is this correct? If so, then you should not have to list them in the XML I think.
That is correct. This map is purely an objective map, therefore terminator games shouldn't be possible. Does this present a problem? The only way around this is to have AA, AB, & AC able to take-out the parachutes.And is it correct that it is impossible to eliminate opponents in this map, since you can’t attack the 8 parachutes?????
Please let me know.