Moderator: Community Team
ya i can get kalish to play as you....seeing he get nk'd in like every game....mandalorian2298 wrote:Sorry for not posting more, but I am torned between Godfather and Lost Mafia, plus playing Poker on Facebook, plus studying. When will you guys agree on sam normal quequing system?![]()
Seriously, I have no idea what's going on. Could you please replace me LoVo?

lord voldemort wrote:ya i can get kalish to play as you....seeing he get nk'd in like every game....mandalorian2298 wrote:Sorry for not posting more, but I am torned between Godfather and Lost Mafia, plus playing Poker on Facebook, plus studying. When will you guys agree on sam normal quequing system?![]()
Seriously, I have no idea what's going on. Could you please replace me LoVo?
shame though

lord voldemort wrote:ok william...though u f*ck up and u wont play one of my games again
In my biaised opinion, this post wins the scummiest of the day awardfirth4eva wrote:It's all we've got. I suggest killing ga7 in the night vig.
unvote vote iliad
I got mad at Cena cause this kind of loopholes were very frown upon back in the day (and more recently in Wandlore) and I never saw anything refering to it being allowed in this game before Lovo notified it. Frankly I'm not sure why... It does have the potential to screw a game. *shrugs* If I was scum I'd be happy being given free info about the town WC to make a better fakeclaim if neededMountainLion wrote:.the fact is maybe ga7 was more mad about it because he's not on the same side as militant and cena and doesn't like seeing them trust each other. Of course I can't prove it, but it's something to consider since ga7 is under question.
I'm very cool, thank you. Err... Metagame excuse: I'm always more suspected when I'm townMountainLion wrote:So far ga7 has taken the heat on this day in stride, so either he's town and stands by his actions or he is one very cool (scum) customer. We either add votes and make him claim or we go in a different direction. For now I'm going to Vote JND.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
yes something like animorp didwilliam18 wrote:lord voldemort wrote:ok william...though u f*ck up and u wont play one of my games again
When have I messed up? And what do you mean by f*ck up? Do you mean terrible playing or do what Animorph did?

jnd94 wrote:wow.....wtf.......Im not claiming because of that shit evidence...that doesnt warrant a claim from me.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
This post apparently somehow shows that jnd was upset with clive blowing his cover. I have 2 very big objections to this kind of reasoning.jnd94 wrote:*hits head* why claim that Clive? Did you read wiki on him? Vote Clive
I agree that this looks like scum trying to save his Naive Leader from a lynch. I don't think it's as good as a case as I presented on Iliad though, so my vote is staying with Iliad.jnd94 wrote:why in hell would he claim that? Maybe he's a jester...claims a non-town win condition, then leaves with 'computer troubles', hoping we lynch him.

I disagree. My case is valid. Your defence is nothing.Iliad wrote:Your case against me is nothing
Sorry to metagame but I usually do not unvote if a couple of people have already unvoted.

I don't understand why some of you are focusing so much on the 3rd quote I listed by JND. I built a case with the first two quotes as well. Did you actually read my whole post?!MountainLion wrote:Now let's take a look at JND...these posts are made after Clive says he didn't get a win condition and thinks he's 3rd party:
jnd94 wrote:why in hell would he claim that? Maybe he's a jester...claims a non-town win condition, then leaves with 'computer troubles', hoping we lynch him.Then kalish looks up Clive's fake claim and it works against him. Clive gets more votes until he is lynched. JND is one of the last to vote Clive. Here is what he says when he votes him:jnd94 wrote:I don't like to lynch people based on that logic....because you can't guarantee it. I know I for one messed around win conditions in my games so that you couldn't use that logic, and who knows if Lovo has. Even if Lovo wrote every single one the same, I still think it's faulty.
jnd94 wrote:*hits head* why claim that Clive? Did you read wiki on him? Vote Clive
wrong turn is one game, I'm trying to find the page.Sierra_Leon wrote:I disagree. My case is valid. Your defence is nothing.Iliad wrote:Your case against me is nothing
Sorry to metagame but I usually do not unvote if a couple of people have already unvoted.
If you can show me 2 or 3 examples of other games on this site where you didn't unvote someone because a couple of people already unvoted before you, I'll reconsider my stance on you. A link to your posts in those threads would be appreciated, so I won't have to browse through 50 pages to find them.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Well then if you didnt say I defended him, what the hell are you lynching me for?MountainLion wrote:Technically I didn't really say you defended him, jnd. It just appears that way. This is Day 2, so there's not much to work with. I presented a case and a couple players have agreed with it, so it must be worth something.
noLSU Tiger Josh wrote:That unvote looks pretty scummy in light of what Clive turned out to be especially being that a lot of people at that time were going for Clive while you had yours on Mili then.