White kids and black kids.

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
User avatar
greenoaks
Posts: 9977
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:47 am

Re: White kids and black kids.

Post by greenoaks »

PLAYER57832 wrote:Actually, a good argument in support of what I wrote! When you focus on race, revenge and blame... extremists are happy to leap in and take advantage.

The problems in Zimbabwe are due to a president who tried to overnight change the farming system without any real knowledge about it, robbed his people and suppresses violently any and all opposition ... like despots of all colors have always done.

The problems are not race, BUT the fact that he was allowed to rise to power and to successfully blame whites for the troubles of his country (at least initially) IS directly the result of the years and years of oppression -- so that someone was able to rise up, promise the moon and be heard. .. whether he actually made sense or not.
i was not trying to belittle the struggle women have had for equality but when compared to racism there just isn't the same level of violence involved.

sure you might miss out on a promotion, not get paid as much or be expected to hold down a full-time job while raising the children, doing all the housework and looking after your lazy good for nothing husband/boyfriend but you don't live in fear of being grabbed in the middle of the night and raped & killed because of your race or ethnicity like people all over the world do whether they are an afro-american in the US last century fearing whites, white zimbabwean & south african farmers now fearing blacks or an oramo/tigre living in close proximity to the other in ethiopia.

for some reason apartheid just seems to be more violent.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: White kids and black kids.

Post by PLAYER57832 »

greenoaks wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:Actually, a good argument in support of what I wrote! When you focus on race, revenge and blame... extremists are happy to leap in and take advantage.

The problems in Zimbabwe are due to a president who tried to overnight change the farming system without any real knowledge about it, robbed his people and suppresses violently any and all opposition ... like despots of all colors have always done.

The problems are not race, BUT the fact that he was allowed to rise to power and to successfully blame whites for the troubles of his country (at least initially) IS directly the result of the years and years of oppression -- so that someone was able to rise up, promise the moon and be heard. .. whether he actually made sense or not.
i was not trying to belittle the struggle women have had for equality but when compared to racism there just isn't the same level of violence involved.

sure you might miss out on a promotion, not get paid as much or be expected to hold down a full-time job while raising the children, doing all the housework and looking after your lazy good for nothing husband/boyfriend but you don't live in fear of being grabbed in the middle of the night and raped & killed because of your race or ethnicity like people all over the world do whether they are an afro-american in the US last century fearing whites, white zimbabwean & south african farmers now fearing blacks or an oramo/tigre living in close proximity to the other in ethiopia.

for some reason apartheid just seems to be more violent.
Oh, I fully agree, but I thought you were trying to say that Zimbabwe was an example of why we should look to more revenge instead of tolerance .. if I misunderstood, sorry

Also, my "been there done that" comment was in reference to the rugby situation mentioned just prior, and losing teams ... not the entire political situation.

That said, when women first joined the New York fire department, they were threatened physically, seriously injured, raped and subjected to repeated death threats and attempts on their lives. Even the women who preceded me in the Forest Service had to endure a good deal outright physical harassment, so they might not be quite so different as you suppose.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: White kids and black kids.

Post by PLAYER57832 »

I also might add that I was partially quoting Neitche (sp?), who as a denizen of the gErman concentration camps does have a reasonable comparison.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4634
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: White kids and black kids.

Post by jonesthecurl »

PLAYER57832 wrote:I also might add that I was partially quoting Neitche (sp?), who as a denizen of the gErman concentration camps does have a reasonable comparison.
Are you sure you know what a "denizen" is?
Nietsche was long dead by then
User avatar
wicked
Posts: 15787
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 1:23 pm

Re: White kids and black kids.

Post by wicked »

I don't like chocolate or vanilla. I prefer strawberry.





----------------------------------------------------------------
FREE NORSE!!
f*ck you twildo
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: White kids and black kids.

Post by PLAYER57832 »

jonesthecurl wrote:
PLAYER57832 wrote:I also might add that I was partially quoting Neitche (sp?), who as a denizen of the gErman concentration camps does have a reasonable comparison.
Are you sure you know what a "denizen" is?
Nietsche was long dead by then
then it is a different one.

The one I am referring to spoke of the freedom inside oneself where no one else can touch .. but this is starting to be a tangent. If I am wrong, feel free to pm me or begin a new thread.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”