roosteronspeed & stinkycheese multi account??? [cleared]

All previously decided cases. Please check here before opening a new case.

Moderators: Multi Hunters, Cheating/Abuse Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

[These cases have been closed. If you would like to appeal the decision of the hunter please open a ticket on the help page and the case will be looked into by a second hunter.]
Locked
User avatar
Phil1979
Posts: 36
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 8:03 am
Location: Liverpool, UK

roosteronspeed & stinkycheese multi account??? [cleared]

Post by Phil1979 »

Is there a way the mods can do an ip check on theses 2 players?

They play every game together and take their turns at the same time. These 2 are definately the 1 account.

Can somebody check please?

Ban them both if they are cheating as this game does not need idiots like that.
User avatar
Brett J
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:11 am
Location: Washington, D.C.

The link

Post by Brett J »

Thanks Phil. Here is the link:

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=72229

Please take a look at all of roosteronspeed's past games. He ONLY plays doubles/freesytle with stinkycheese and they ALWAYS take their turns simultaneously.

I know that he/they have been cleared before, but if this isn't what multi-account abuse looks like then I don't know what does.
User avatar
Twill
Posts: 3630
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:54 pm

Post by Twill »

If they have been cleared before, they will (and are being) cleared again.

You are welcome to leave feedback for them with regards to their playstyles if you have played them yourselves.

Thanks for the report
User avatar
stinkycheese
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by stinkycheese »

:-({|=
User avatar
Exterminator
Posts: 481
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:52 pm

Post by Exterminator »

These 2 may have been cleared before but i still think they are multis.

EVIDENCE: Always play doubles together in a freestyle so he/she can place all the armies he wants where ever he/she can. AND he/she always takes his/her turn at the same time. I played them once... game 77953.

I think they are the same person and it ruins the game for everyone else. :cry:
User avatar
Herakilla
Posts: 4283
Joined: Fri Jun 09, 2006 8:33 pm
Location: Wandering the world, spreading Conquerism

Post by Herakilla »

thats called good teamwork....
Come join us in Live Chat!
User avatar
A Mans Part
Posts: 184
Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 12:20 pm
Location: Kamchatka

Post by A Mans Part »

I would think it is harder to play freestyle doubles as a multi. Easier to have someone else playing at the same time so you can pass armies around during a single turn.
Image
User avatar
stinkycheese
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by stinkycheese »

Exterminator wrote:These 2 may have been cleared before but i still think they are multis.

EVIDENCE: Always play doubles together in a freestyle so he/she can place all the armies he wants where ever he/she can. AND he/she always takes his/her turn at the same time. I played them once... game 77953.

I think they are the same person and it ruins the game for everyone else. :cry:
:-({|=

Maybe third times a charm?
User avatar
thejackofhearts
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Jul 16, 2006 5:33 pm
Location: On top of the Queen of Hearts

Post by thejackofhearts »

Maybe we should start a forum where people complain about other people's superior tactics...</sarcasm>
docchaos
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 7:11 am

Post by docchaos »

Come on guys, it's a that not uncommon playstyle to take turns simultaneously in freestyle-doubles. I play like this with a friend of mine and I saw many other players play like this aswell, so what's the problem about it?
User avatar
stinkycheese
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by stinkycheese »

docchaos wrote:Come on guys, it's a that not uncommon playstyle to take turns simultaneously in freestyle-doubles. I play like this with a friend of mine and I saw many other players play like this aswell, so what's the problem about it?


We do it well, I guess that's the problem.
chris_in_seattle
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed May 10, 2006 5:09 pm
Location: I'll give you three guesses....

stinkycheese and roosteronspeed are confirmed cheaters

Post by chris_in_seattle »

the third party lovro_sl is the M.O. in game #95290
User avatar
stinkycheese
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: stinkycheese and roosteronspeed are confirmed cheaters

Post by stinkycheese »

chris_in_seattle wrote:the third party lovro_sl is the M.O. in game #95290


[cleared]

lrn2reed
menofrivendell
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:31 am

Post by menofrivendell »

you are all uneducated fools. a real tactician would realize that roosteronspeed is stinkycheese. he's abusing this system and the authoritative figures on this site. i havent played him, but ive heard many things from friends and in forums. fact: he is a multi. how you do not see this is beyond me. if he wasn't a multi, dont you think wed be hearing from rooster on speed as well as stinkycheese, if they are 2 diff. people being accused? the only logical explanation i can come up with for this heresy is that roosteronspeed/stinkycheese has friendly relations with one of the authors of this site.
thank you and good night.
User avatar
stinkycheese
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Post by stinkycheese »

menofrivendell wrote:you are all uneducated fools. a real tactician would realize that roosteronspeed is stinkycheese. he's abusing this system and the authoritative figures on this site. i havent played him, but ive heard many things from friends and in forums. fact: he is a multi. how you do not see this is beyond me. if he wasn't a multi, dont you think wed be hearing from rooster on speed as well as stinkycheese, if they are 2 diff. people being accused? the only logical explanation i can come up with for this heresy is that roosteronspeed/stinkycheese has friendly relations with one of the authors of this site.
thank you and good night.


2006-10-29 12:37:06 - stinkycheese attacked Irkutsk from Kamchatka and conquered it from britarmy
2006-10-29 12:37:06 - roosteronspeed deployed 22 armies on Siberia

http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=95919

Oh look we executed two moves on the exact same second. Can you explain that one Mr. Educated? I guess it's too hard a concept for you to grasp that two friends can play together.

I could post our entire AIM conversation on here, but I don't think you really need anymore proof.
Team Z-Man
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 6:25 pm

I don't understand

Post by Team Z-Man »

what I don't understand is how stinkycheese has gotten about 200 people kicked out as multis for doing much less than him, like they "play with the same people in both accounts." That got someone else kicked out by stinkycheese, and yet he gets cleared for playing exclusively with the same guy?
User avatar
stinkycheese
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:07 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Re: I don't understand

Post by stinkycheese »

Team Z-Man wrote:what I don't understand is how stinkycheese has gotten about 200 people kicked out as multis


2, lucian and dkopp...if youre going on the theory that dkopp is two brothers then it's 3 people. the only reason i even found dkopp is because lucian was such an obvious multi that i looked into lucian's other games.

Team Z-Man wrote:"play with the same people in both accounts." That got someone else kicked out by stinkycheese


That isn't why he got banned. He got banned because the mods scanned each player's ip and they came out the same.

Team Z-Man wrote:and yet he gets cleared for playing exclusively with the same guy?


Last I checked there are only 2 rules and this isn't breaking either of them.


I realize that you guys are only mad because dkopp got banned and not lucian, which leads me to believe that dkopp may in fact be innocent. However, sitting here bitching and whining about how terrible a person I am isn't going to get him back. All he has to do is appeal to lack...
Locked

Return to “Closed C&A Reports”