Moderator: Community Team
Admit it, the only time you're happy is when you are being a sadist!got tonkaed wrote:there were a couple of justifications in the article that made me chuckle, mostly the one about traditional vs more egalitarian divisions of labor in marriages. Apparently in traditional marriages women are never bothered by their spouses household work habits. It was probably one of the times where i thought the article made something of a backhanded swipe at the intellectual capacity of conservatives.
Fine, Masochism as well.got tonkaed wrote:I suppose i would have to. All of those ideas about fairness and equality for people scream sadism.
Alex Youngren wrote:u know come to think of it liberals do seem more pissed off all the time
Conservatives as you understand the term don't stand for the status quo at all, they stand for overthrowing the welfare nanny-state and instauring a golden age of respect for property rights and liberty. They believe in freedom: they are the original liberals, but, "as a supreme if unintended compliment to its proponents, the enemies of free enterprise thought it wise to appropriate it's label".greenoaks wrote:life is like risk. the conservatives are the defenders of the status quo, the liberals the attackers.
the liberals are more stressed because even if they can match the conservatives, it is a draw and all draws go to the defender.
Leftists get angry and afraid because their vast mollycoddling superstructural nanny-state is threatned with destruction by authentic liberals, and along with it's demise would come the inevitable necessity for them to fend for themselves in the real world, like real men, a prospect they are thoroughly terrified by, since most of them are incapable, lazy, pathetic flower-coller wearing cactus-smokers who, vampire-like, live by sucking the fruits of others' labor, and live the more, the more they leech.btownmeggy wrote:But, they seem so angry and afraid.
You see what I mean?Napoleon Ier wrote:Leftists get angry and afraid because their vast mollycoddling superstructural nanny-state is threatned with destruction by authentic liberals, and along with it's demise would come the inevitable necessity for them to fend for themselves in the real world, like real men, a prospect they are thoroughly terrified by, since most of them are incapable, lazy, pathetic flower-coller wearing cactus-smokers who, vampire-like, live by sucking the fruits of others' labor, and live the more, the more they leech.btownmeggy wrote:But, they seem so angry and afraid.
What's wrong with a nanny state? I think most people could do with a nanny...Napoleon Ier wrote:Leftists get angry and afraid because their vast mollycoddling superstructural nanny-state is threatned with destruction by authentic liberals, and along with it's demise would come the inevitable necessity for them to fend for themselves in the real world, like real men, a prospect they are thoroughly terrified by, since most of them are incapable, lazy, pathetic flower-coller wearing cactus-smokers who, vampire-like, live by sucking the fruits of others' labor, and live the more, the more they leech.btownmeggy wrote:But, they seem so angry and afraid.
i disagree with you on that.Napoleon Ier wrote:Conservatives as you understand the term don't stand for the status quo at all, they stand for overthrowing the welfare nanny-state and instauring a golden age of respect for property rights and liberty. They believe in freedom: they are the original liberals, but, "as a supreme if unintended compliment to its proponents, the enemies of free enterprise thought it wise to appropriate it's label".greenoaks wrote:life is like risk. the conservatives are the defenders of the status quo, the liberals the attackers.
the liberals are more stressed because even if they can match the conservatives, it is a draw and all draws go to the defender.
See what that article means?btownmeggy wrote:You see what I mean?Napoleon Ier wrote:Leftists get angry and afraid because their vast mollycoddling superstructural nanny-state is threatned with destruction by authentic liberals, and along with it's demise would come the inevitable necessity for them to fend for themselves in the real world, like real men, a prospect they are thoroughly terrified by, since most of them are incapable, lazy, pathetic flower-coller wearing cactus-smokers who, vampire-like, live by sucking the fruits of others' labor, and live the more, the more they leech.btownmeggy wrote:But, they seem so angry and afraid.
PLAYER57832 wrote:I hope we all become liberal drones.
"I" is a pronoun.DangerBoy wrote:See what that article means?BtownMeggy wrote: You see what I mean?
so, those w/ enough money to live comfortably (including their land) get to keep it, regardless of inequalities of opportunity and in (willful) ignorance of the marginalized folks that this system has been/is being built on.....there's a phrase for that......Napoleon Ier wrote:Conservatives as you understand the term don't stand for the status quo at all, they stand for overthrowing the welfare nanny-state and instauring a golden age of respect for property rights and liberty. They believe in freedom: they are the original liberals, but, "as a supreme if unintended compliment to its proponents, the enemies of free enterprise thought it wise to appropriate it's label".greenoaks wrote:life is like risk. the conservatives are the defenders of the status quo, the liberals the attackers.
the liberals are more stressed because even if they can match the conservatives, it is a draw and all draws go to the defender.
"See" is a verbbtownmeggy wrote:"I" is a pronoun.DangerBoy wrote:See what that article means?BtownMeggy wrote: You see what I mean?
PLAYER57832 wrote:I hope we all become liberal drones.
And I think that most people could do with a swift kick to their rear end. It varies, I guess, from person to person.InkL0sed wrote:What's wrong with a nanny state? I think most people could do with a nanny...Napoleon Ier wrote:Leftists get angry and afraid because their vast mollycoddling superstructural nanny-state is threatned with destruction by authentic liberals, and along with it's demise would come the inevitable necessity for them to fend for themselves in the real world, like real men, a prospect they are thoroughly terrified by, since most of them are incapable, lazy, pathetic flower-coller wearing cactus-smokers who, vampire-like, live by sucking the fruits of others' labor, and live the more, the more they leech.btownmeggy wrote:But, they seem so angry and afraid.
Heh. It's funny how what you just said pretty much validated my statement above...muy_thaiguy wrote:And I think that most people could do with a swift kick to their rear end. It varies, I guess, from person to person.InkL0sed wrote:What's wrong with a nanny state? I think most people could do with a nanny...
