*mumble*... It wasnt me who gave him the gift... Also this is the second warning for those two who were given a gift from me that could be helpful today, the next time will be names.
got tonkaed wrote:Well its not a hard choice to make, the fact that you dont jump out and see that without needing to be prompted suggests one of two things...either your not reading, or your not doing it on purpose.
Neither one of them is acceptable and therefore you earned your reprimand. Happens to the best of us, chin up.
The Ever Changing Avatar! (yes, I have avatar ADD)
got tonkaed wrote:Well its not a hard choice to make, the fact that you dont jump out and see that without needing to be prompted suggests one of two things...either your not reading, or your not doing it on purpose.
Neither one of them is acceptable and therefore you earned your reprimand. Happens to the best of us, chin up.
*cough*
EBWOP
The Ever Changing Avatar! (yes, I have avatar ADD)
Nope. Either he hasn't been online since I sent it, or he hasn't read my PM.
I'm guessing the former.
And I do not crave attention. I get enough as it is.
Minister Masket wrote:Nope. Either he hasn't been online since I sent it, or he hasn't read my PM.
I'm guessing the former.
And I do not crave attention. I get enough as it is.
No hes definately been on considering he replaced kiwi with ace after you said that you had sent in your investigation.
Interesting. I'm thinking that might mean Rapunzel and Cinderella might be masons with each other.
Droz I received a gift back on day 1, but the result of it is confusing to me as it gives me a hint at the identity of someone. At this time, I do not wish to reveal what it states as it could bring about misfortune for this person by getting the scum to go after them. If I find this person in danger, then I will speak up and reveal the contents of what was stated to me to open up discussion before they wind up lynched.
LSU Tiger Josh
The man, the myth, the legend has returned.
Still no result from Masket eh? Starts to look incriminating.
Rumpelstiltskin >< Rapunzel btw, a bit weird in fact cause that character is a tricky little goblin that wants the ever-popular first born child in exchange for help in the tale of the same name.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
ga7 wrote:Still no result from Masket eh? Starts to look incriminating.
Rumpelstiltskin >< Rapunzel btw, a bit weird in fact cause that character is a tricky little goblin that wants the ever-popular first born child in exchange for help in the tale of the same name.
Rather than incriminating its attention seeking, thats the whole reason he told us he had an investigation before he used it. He's hoping that everyone is sweating it out, waiting for his next work, when in fact the majority of us are bored with the childish behaiviour. He did this in unmafia when all he actually had to say was a gangbang took place at ga7's house.
LSU Tiger Josh wrote:Interesting. I'm thinking that might mean Rapunzel and Cinderella might be masons with each other.
The message didn't say Rapunzel, it said Rumpelstilskin (the little bastard who takes away children as a payment for gilding services). I think that this is a result of some kind of Random investigation. Perhaps Cindy and Rump were on the same bandwagon in the end of Day 1 (since the note says that they were working togather).
Mishuk gotal'u meshuroke, pako kyore.
Talapus wrote:
I'm far more pissed that mandy and his thought process were right from the get go....damn you mandy.
ga7 wrote:Still no result from Masket eh? Starts to look incriminating.
Rumpelstiltskin >< Rapunzel btw, a bit weird in fact cause that character is a tricky little goblin that wants the ever-popular first born child in exchange for help in the tale of the same name.
I agree. Rumpelstiltskin would have fit to the non-believers as character, whereas Rapunzel is most likely on the believer's side. But as written on the text, this events may be also fictional.
mandalorian2298 wrote:
......
Perhaps Cindy and Rump were on the same bandwagon in the end of Day 1 (since the note says that they were working togather).
Combined with my last post, this makes more sense to me, because I can hardly imagine that Cinderella and Rump were on the same side.
ga7 wrote:Still no result from Masket eh? Starts to look incriminating.
Rumpelstiltskin >< Rapunzel btw, a bit weird in fact cause that character is a tricky little goblin that wants the ever-popular first born child in exchange for help in the tale of the same name.
Rather than incriminating its attention seeking, thats the whole reason he told us he had an investigation before he used it. He's hoping that everyone is sweating it out, waiting for his next work, when in fact the majority of us are bored with the childish behaiviour. He did this in unmafia when all he actually had to say was a gangbang took place at ga7's house.
What gibberish is this? I can't give result when I haven't got it!
Anyway I have it now, although it's slightly different from last time. Apparently it's an investiagtion that gives out clues instead of alliances. A Black Feather
Reading this, it says that the letters were hard to read. could that mean that the names might be messed up slightly or something? or he read the wrong name(s)?
Minister Masket wrote:What gibberish is this? I can't give result when I haven't got it!
Anyway I have it now, although it's slightly different from last time. Apparently it's an investiagtion that gives out clues instead of alliances. A Black Feather
This ringing any bells with anyone?
I am not really familiar with grim fairy tales, but black is usually the color of evil in children's stories.
tweet tweet, A black feather? I know nothing about this at all. Please dont go about bandwagonning/lynching me because black isnt a pretty colour.Im sure this means something to someone but not to me.
Personally I am a little suspicious of MM this sounds made up to me, did anyone else get a gift?
Well, Rumpelstiltskin gives wishes to the broke and troubled, and Cinderella was pretty bad off, makes sense to me.
But what I find interesting are the breadcrumbs part, this seems to be similar to Hansel and Gretel, perhaps with an "Anonymous Reporter" type role.
The scene ends with the hunter wondering whether the things written are actually true... so we should keep in mind these things aren't necessarily right. It might be a 1 true/1 false kind of thing.