Moderator: Community Team

Nah, it is not 'thrilling'.cumsitter wrote:when i add armies to a couuntry all the other countries nearby get mad and impose sanctions. sometimes i think its not worth it to bring Christianity and Democracy to the heathens but then i realize it's God's will.
what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
What points?cumsitter wrote: what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
cumsitter wrote:what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
Game 2488186 was a Public game, no passwords...Sauzer wrote:Hahah what is this about secret alliances? I password protect my games you sillies.
Also lolin' at the paranoia.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Yeah that was before anyone had premium but afaik that game is going by the book anyway?Hrvat wrote:Game 2488186 was a Public game, no passwords...
You can play as many Private games as you like, with your friends, however NOT public games.
I almost joined game 2488186... and there was NO password.
i do not understand your post. basmati rice from india > *, however. also i love the finger wagging emoteHrvat wrote:Nah, it is not 'thrilling'.cumsitter wrote:when i add armies to a couuntry all the other countries nearby get mad and impose sanctions. sometimes i think its not worth it to bring Christianity and Democracy to the heathens but then i realize it's God's will.
what's it like to analyze every game looking for cheaters because of your precious points rather than just sit back and play a board game? i imagine it's thrilling
However, I dislike joining games where "3 workmates" play together... Somehow, '3 workmates' tend to survive other players and they fight it out among themselves....
Did '3 workmates' announce in the game chat that they are "3 workmates"??? Answer: they did not announce in the game chat that they are "3 workmates". And what about "ianthekorean", he has also played with one or two of "3 workmates" on number of occasions.
![]()
3-4-5-6-player 1vs1 games are supposed to be 1vs1, not '3 workmates' vs 1, nor '3 workmates+1 vs 1"
And all alliances, relations, and "workmateships" should be announced in the game chat, or it is considered cheating (at least in my book)
"Christianity and Democracy" what has that got to do with a rise of price of rice in China???
2488186 was a game all of players who know each other from elsewhere. There was no need to announce any relationships, because we all knew each other. Its highly unlikely that you almost joined 2488186 as you claimed because we all joined it within 5 seconds of creating it. If you had managed to join the game, any alliances would have been announced to you. As it turned out, there were no alliances in that game and it was pretty much a free-for-all.Hrvat wrote:Game 2488186 was a Public game, no passwords...Sauzer wrote:Hahah what is this about secret alliances? I password protect my games you sillies.
Also lolin' at the paranoia.
You can play as many Private games as you like, with your friends, however NOT public games.
I almost joined game 2488186... and there was NO password.