Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
gdeangel
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2008 11:48 pm
Gender: Male
Location: In the Basement

Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by gdeangel »

... O'Bama says he's got the grass roots support (at least in funding) and will get the nomination. He's managed to back-pocket the super delegates by starting outside the beltway, with the governors of bannana stand states who think they are/have cut an inroad with the future president who is not already in with the beltway insiders, and then, as no surprise, the beltway insiders, not to be outflanked by a bunch of bannana stand governors, jump on the bandwagon too. At the same time he is talking about reviving democracy, the guy is writing letters to the superdelegates that say they don't have to wait for the people to vote in every state... they should decare alegece to him so that the people will know who to follow (in politico speak - "rally around").

nytimes.com wrote:Mr. Obama’s effort with the superdelegates began early Tuesday — at 6:58 a.m. Eastern time, Mr. Obama’s campaign announced that Joyce Lalonde, a Democratic superdelegate from Michigan, had joined the Obama campaign. If all goes as planned, it will continue through the day with a steady stream of endorsements. The moment the polls close in South Dakota, marking the official end of the nominating season — at 10 p.m. Eastern — a delegation of at least eight members of Congress who had been holding out until after the primaries will announce their support of Mr. Obama, according to Mr. Obama’s aides.


These are nothing but underhanded maneuvers to get Clinton supporters to lose hope. There are cheap wranglings to get the undecided voter to "go with the flow"... after all, most people would rather back a winner than be right, yes? So if your running a campaign based on that level of disrespect for voters intelligence, what does that say about your true appreciation for the base... not a lot! If I were one of the 8 members of Congress planning to declare, and the campaign leaked it to the press prior to the voting, I'd pull my support based on the campaign's unconcealed contempt for the democratic process.

To the candidate with the lifetime experience, the candidate who had won the battleground states, the candidate who understands the magnitude of the issues and is not going around with a can of whitewash making promises that are unequivocally "feel good" dreams... she is told to stop making trouble... to drop out of the race so all the dumb Democratic voters will know who to rally around. While the O'Bama zealots were happy to out-maneuver Mrs. Clinton in the various state caucuses, they now are quaking in their boots about the notion that they might actually get outmaneuvered at the National Convention.

Shame on you Howard Dean. Shame on you Democratic party leaders. I'd like to see Clinton tell you to go f*ck yourselves and break off to form a new party. Who else feels the same way?
My ever constant two last games seem to have no end in sight!
Psy Oct
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Psy Oct »

Oh god no, that's a horrible idea. It'd completely split the Democrat vote, giving the republicans an easy victory.
bedub1
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am
Gender: Male

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by bedub1 »

gdeangel wrote:I'd like to see Clinton tell you to go f*ck yourselves and break off to form a new party.


I agree. Clinton should say that on public tv...and then break off to go form her own party, and hopefully I'd never have to see her again.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by jonesthecurl »

Take a look at the history of the SDP in the UK - cost the Labour party the election in the 80's. (I can't remember the year offhand). Ironically, the Labour party that ultimately gained power after the SDP was eaten by the Liberal party was far to the right of founders of the SDP itself.
Psy Oct
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Psy Oct »

Image

Experience.
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by jonesthecurl »

She is just so photogenic.
She looks like Gollum in that one.
Psy Oct
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:13 pm

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Psy Oct »

Image

Vote for me <:
tzor
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by tzor »

gdeangel wrote:These are nothing but underhanded maneuvers to get Clinton supporters to lose hope.


:lol: Loose hope? :lol: Loose hope? :lol:

Clinton is nothing but a liar and a cheat. She has not "won" the popular vote and no matter how many times she has stated this as a fact it no more a fact as Bush's weapons of mass destruction. She went against the party twice in cases where the states went against the party, especially in one state where she was the only damn person on the ballot. I'm sorry but this isn't the Soviet Union, this isn't Russia, we are not supposed to have one candidate elections and when we do we don't gloat over the numbers over the person who followed the party rules and didn't ran.

If she or her followers wants to start their own Feminazi party then they can all go to political oblivion. In the rare chance she has a snowballs chance there is always the nuclear option.

You see if we impeach Bush and Cheney (at the same time) then Pelosi becomes the first Woman President of the United States and poor Hillary is left holding the bag! After all who want's to be number two?
Image
User avatar
jonesthecurl
Posts: 4625
Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2008 9:42 am
Gender: Male
Location: disused action figure warehouse
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by jonesthecurl »

Psy Oct wrote:
Vote for me <:

My god when I said that I was working from memory, but she bloody does, doesn't she? Poor girl.
User avatar
Caleb the Cruel
Posts: 1686
Joined: Sun May 28, 2006 8:36 pm
Location: Northern Colorado
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Caleb the Cruel »

GO HILLARY!

Popular vote! Experience! First female president! Realistic ideas! Deserves the nomination!
Image
User avatar
Timminz
Posts: 5579
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 1:05 pm
Gender: Male
Location: At the store

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Timminz »

User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Frigidus »

I'd approve if Hillary Clinton died.
spurgistan
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sat Oct 07, 2006 11:30 pm

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by spurgistan »

How can you say that Obama's convincing voters they're vote doesn't matter? There aren't any more freaking voters!! The last primaries are today, and are being held in states that have absolutely no impact on the final delegate tolls. I applaud Hillary Clinton for hanging tough in this excruciating primary season, but she simply didn't plan for the extended campaign correctly, throwing all her dice on the hopes that she could sweep Obama out of the election on Super Tuesday, ironically - at least to OP's post - telling the voters in all subsequent contests that their vote didn't matter. So, shame on OP for misrepresenting the facts, and furthermore encouraging Hillary (even though she won't) to do something that could only be damaging to the Democratic Party. Face it, Hillary fans - of which I am one, but voted for Obama - Hillary gambled on Super Tuesday and lost, and after that she couldn't really scrape her way back in.
Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Juan_Bottom »

This isn't even a realistic option.
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by MeDeFe »

Hillary Clinton
Image


Master Splinter
Image


I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't see very many similarities.
bedub1
Posts: 1005
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 4:41 am
Gender: Male

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by bedub1 »

MeDeFe wrote:Hillary Clinton
Image


Master Splinter
Image


I don't know about the rest of you, but I don't see very many similarities.

They are both rats
User avatar
muy_thaiguy
Posts: 12746
Joined: Fri May 18, 2007 11:20 am
Gender: Male
Location: Back in Black
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by muy_thaiguy »

But I'd rather have the one with the tail and fur then the chronic liar as a president.
"Eh, whatever."
-Anonymous


What, you expected something deep or flashy?
User avatar
DaGip
Posts: 4047
Joined: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:48 am
Location: Watertown, South Dakota

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by DaGip »

Hillary should UNITE the Dems, not splinter it. Ron Paul is splintering the Republicans, Obama should have an easy victory! =D>
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis
Image
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Juan_Bottom »

http://news.aol.com/elections/story/_a/ ... 1200309767

She isn't splitting the Dems anymore?.....
User avatar
CoffeeCream
Posts: 259
Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2007 6:43 pm

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by CoffeeCream »

Continuing with the Hillary Clinton slideshow tour

Image

I think that's what she's going to look like when someone finally tells her Obama won.
luns101 wrote:You should be able to convert a soul from 500 yards away armed only with a Gideon New Testament that you found at a Holiday Inn!!!!
muy_thaiguy wrote:Sir! Permission to do 50 push-ups with the Ark of the Covenant on my back?
User avatar
Juan_Bottom
Posts: 1110
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 4:59 pm
Location: USA RULES! WHOOO!!!!

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by Juan_Bottom »

COFFEECREAM missed my post?
User avatar
InkL0sed
Posts: 2370
Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2007 4:06 pm
Gender: Male
Location: underwater
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by InkL0sed »

Someone doesn't know their history.

Look at how Woodrow Wilson got elected. TR was so upset at Taft that he ran as a third-party candidate (and did the best as one ever), and thus gave the election to Wilson, the first Democrat in a long time.

There are so many other examples of a split party handing an easy win to its opponent, but this is just the most obvious one (to me, anyway).
User avatar
MeDeFe
Posts: 7831
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 2:48 am
Location: Follow the trail of holes in other people's arguments.

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by MeDeFe »

I think the best thing that could happen is if both the democrats and the republicans split. Then you can finally make a break with your de facto two-party system.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
tzor
Posts: 4076
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 9:43 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Long Island, NY, USA
Contact:

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by tzor »

MeDeFe wrote:I think the best thing that could happen is if both the democrats and the republicans split. Then you can finally make a break with your de facto two-party system.


It's a great idea for everything but the presidental election. You need a majority to get elected. There are no run off elections, you just get the buck passed to Congress.

At the local level a four party system is viable. Still in general they tend to form coalitions and the weaker party tends to become a shadow of the stronger party. In New York we have this with the Republican - Conservative and the Democratic - Liberal parties. The Conservative party is a viable party in its own right, the latest candidates to the town council where I live were actually from the Conservative party and it was the Republican party that rubber stamped the decision.
Image
User avatar
got tonkaed
Posts: 5034
Joined: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:01 pm
Location: Detroit

Re: Should Hillary form a Splinter Party?

Post by got tonkaed »

MeDeFe wrote:I think the best thing that could happen is if both the democrats and the republicans split. Then you can finally make a break with your de facto two-party system.


to this i say meh. For there really to be a legit third party Hilliary is all wrong for it. She isnt really a break from the democratic party in a way that could establish a new party, and she really isnt pushing hard for an issue (other than nationalized healthcare, which isnt a sustainable party platform) that really can set up a new party.

The only real party split that makes sense as far as i can tell right now, is a green something or other emerging or maybe a rift in the conservative section, between what they call "the true conservatives" and the family values conservatives.
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”