Moderator: Community Team
This is the first time I replied to you, dingleberry... Every other time was replying to someone else. Clown!State409c wrote:Please point them out.
Also, remind the folks why you have me on ignore but keep quoting and replying to this thread?
Clown.
Use commas...State409c wrote:Jesus Christ, detlef, just how moronic do you get? That last post said nothing. Do you realize that? It just reeks of your defeat when you have no coherent argument left.
In your last post, you simply restated what I said in a different way with some other cute comments surrounding it to make you feel good, so you claiming I don't know odds is an indictment on yourself? So, lets get this straight for those playing along.
You're an idiot
You don't know it
Please consider hari kari is your only viable option
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Show me how I am trolling? I was merely pointing out that you should not be so loose with your rude and juvenile words like 'idiot' and 'moronic' when you yourself are on the low side of book smarts.State409c wrote:That's some seriously deficient trolling you're doing there friend. Maybe you should upgrade that ignore level!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
The first highlighted sentence isn't a question; it would be a statement. Secondly, after "idiot"and "moronic", use a period so you don't have a run-on sentence. We all make mistakes Anarkistsdream. No one is grammatically perfect all the time especially on a game site forum.Anarkistsdream wrote:Show me how I am trolling? I was merely pointing out that you should not be so loose with your rude and juvenile words like 'idiot' and 'moronic' when you yourself are on the low side of book smarts.State409c wrote:That's some seriously deficient trolling you're doing there friend. Maybe you should upgrade that ignore level!
It's the second time you cl...actually, you make a clown look brilliant.This is the first time I replied to you, dingleberry... Every other time was replying to someone else. Clown!
Shame you are incorrect on both parts...codeblue1018 wrote:The first highlighted sentence isn't a question; it would be a statement. Secondly, after "idiot"and "moronic", use a period so you don't have a run-on sentence. We all make mistakes Anarkistsdream. No one is grammatically perfect all the time especially on a game site forum.Anarkistsdream wrote:Show me how I am trolling? I was merely pointing out that you should not be so loose with your rude and juvenile words like 'idiot' and 'moronic' when you yourself are on the low side of book smarts.State409c wrote:That's some seriously deficient trolling you're doing there friend. Maybe you should upgrade that ignore level!
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Oh bother. OK, here we go. We're going to but this baby to bed now.State409c wrote:Jesus Christ detlef, just how moronic do you get? That last post said nothing. Do you realize that? It just reeks of your defeat when you have no coherent argument left.
In your last post, you simply restated what I said in a different way with some other cute comments surrounding it to make you feel good, so you claiming I don't know odds is an indictment on yourself? So, lets get this straight for those playing along.
You're an idiot
You don't know it
Please consider hari kari is your only viable option

So, you settle on the notion that the play of stripers should come out as a wash in the end as far as hurting and benefiting, but then go on to prove (with a horribly simplistic example) that the crazy play of others actually ends up helping EVERYONE that isn't a striper?So, the very controversial statement I made went something to the effect of, "Over time you are just as likely to benefit from the random poor play of others as you are to be hurt by it." Are we cool there? Is this the crazy notion that I'm forced to defend?
neither you nor detlef can recover any reputation. detlef because he never lost it, you because you never had it.State409c wrote:So, you settle on the notion that the play of stripers should come out as a wash in the end as far as hurting and benefiting, but then go on to prove (with a horribly simplistic example) that the crazy play of others actually ends up helping EVERYONE that isn't a striper?So, the very controversial statement I made went something to the effect of, "Over time you are just as likely to benefit from the random poor play of others as you are to be hurt by it." Are we cool there? Is this the crazy notion that I'm forced to defend?
It's a good thing you are done with this thread, I'm not sure there is anything you can do to recover any sort of reputation you had.

But, that is my opinion on this topic. I'll go somewhere else now.Twill wrote:Timm, if it ain't on topic, it doesn't being posted
State409c wrote:I won this thread, so, you can lock it is far as I am concerned.
Very interesting game I just had with this so-called, high ranker, Fabledintegral, lol. You play identical to that of a striper. Your suicide attacks and horrendous game play are what this topic and YOU are about. Re-read pal, it fits you to a "T". Never again, ignore listed. Also, since this is our last game, ME: 2 wins, YOU: 0. Enough said!FabledIntegral wrote:Highly doubt it.
You are potentially the most dense person I've ever encountered. Your utter stupidity absolutely amazes me.codeblue1018 wrote:Very interesting game I just had with this so-called, high ranker, Fabledintegral, lol. You play identical to that of a striper. Your suicide attacks and horrendous game play are what this topic and YOU are about. Re-read pal, it fits you to a "T". Never again, ignore listed. Also, since this is our last game, ME: 2 wins, YOU: 0. Enough said!FabledIntegral wrote:Highly doubt it.