Moderator: Community Team
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Would you be wearing a tight shirt, chaps and a cowboy hat when you did that?Juan_Bottom wrote:But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.
I don't know. Stopping at that leaves too much room for interpretation for my liking. What's "promoting violence"? Is it a post by Nappy saying the banlieus in paris should be bombed? Or is the limit reserved for public speeches with large audiences?MeDeFe wrote:FOS only ends when you start promoting hatred or violence towards others.
Point taken, I'll think about it.Snorri1234 wrote:I don't know. Stopping at that leaves too much room for interpretation for my liking. What's "promoting violence"? Is it a post by Nappy saying the banlieus in paris should be bombed? Or is the limit reserved for public speeches with large audiences?MeDeFe wrote:FOS only ends when you start promoting hatred or violence towards others.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
I think we need to draw the line of asking state governors about the phony central banking system that is looting trillions of honest hardworking taxpayers money. Such questions need to be handled harshly, and the questioner arrested immediately, all the while the camera man gets roughed up. Freedom of Speech needs to be revoked, it would make all our lives so much easier. We could all wave little American Flags and join up for some good ol' puppy killin', baby bombin' fun! YEEHAW! WHOOOPEEE! WAHOO! SHOOT 'EM UP! WANTED DEAD OR ALIVE! TOUCHDOWN! GO JOE!Juan_Bottom wrote:APPALACHIAN brought up a good point, how do you really feel about Freedom of Speech? Do you feel so strongly that even NAMBLA has the right to say their peace? Or if they try and speak in your local community will you let them rest in peace?
Do Communists have the right to meet in your local library?
Should people be required to get permits before holding public rallies?
Where do you personally draw the line on Freedom of Speech?
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Juan_Bottom wrote:I guess that I should answer my own question.
Permits are unconstitutional, and I hate them. They are unconstitutional, because they can be denied. Thus denying Freedom of Speech.
I am soooo liberal that I think anyone, even Christians, should be able to meet and speak freely.
But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.
I think that Freedom of Speech should be situational, in private areas, like CC.
But I am very pro-Freedom of Speech.
Thank goodness it isn't personal.suggs wrote:Bugger.
Sorry.
Ok, i withdraw the personal attack.
But anyone, in general terms, naming no names, and peace and love to everyone who has posted on this thread, who would like to smash a truck into people because of the way they are born, is a *insert derogatory comment of your choice*
Better?![]()
Suggs -- Man-Boy Love. Not Man-Man love. Big difference.suggs wrote:Then you are a bigoted, homophobic twat.Juan_Bottom wrote:I guess that I should answer my own question.
Permits are unconstitutional, and I hate them. They are unconstitutional, because they can be denied. Thus denying Freedom of Speech.
I am soooo liberal that I think anyone, even Christians, should be able to meet and speak freely.
But honestly, if NAMBLA(North American Man Boy Love Association) came to my block to hold a rally, I would probably throw down. And by throw down, I mean run them down with a truck.
I think that Freedom of Speech should be situational, in private areas, like CC.
But I am very pro-Freedom of Speech.
I assume you draw the line at hating black people?
So why is it OK to hate gay people?
The answer is: ITS NOT.
I despise you.
It would appear to be a pedophile organisation so time for the dunces hat and an extendedsuggs wrote:hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.
NAMBLA wants to legalize sex with children. Sex between grown men and pre-pubescent boys. I don't have a problem with any homosexual. In fact, I am pro-gay marraige too. And I hope that all homosexuals can have their fill of warm butt-love, or boobie tugging, whatever they want. But adults and children????? Come on.....suggs wrote:Bugger.
Sorry.
Ok, i withdraw the personal attack.
But anyone, in general terms, naming no names, and peace and love to everyone who has posted on this thread, who would like to smash a truck into people because of the way they are born, is a *insert derogatory comment of your choice*
Better?![]()
We don't have to worry about what he thinks of it, my dear.suggs wrote:hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.
suggs I'm not 16.suggs wrote:hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.
danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.
This is so fucking disrespectful...this person needs to be shot immediately! I hate this kind of treasonous shit!Snorri1234 wrote:danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.
It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.
Yeah treason dude. Totally.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Word!DaGip wrote:This is so fucking disrespectful...this person needs to be shot immediately! I hate this kind of treasonous shit!Snorri1234 wrote:danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.
It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.
Yeah treason dude. Totally.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-FvgmAbiCA
This is the most awesome fucking patriotic video clip EVER!Snorri1234 wrote:Word!DaGip wrote:This is so fucking disrespectful...this person needs to be shot immediately! I hate this kind of treasonous shit!Snorri1234 wrote:danvoy9787 wrote:I think that Freedom of Speech is ok in ANY way as long as it remains completely verbal. I hate people that burn the american flag and try to pass it off as FOS. To me, burning our country's flag in a disrepsectful manner is treason, and should be treated as such.
It's totally way more disrespecfulls than, for example, putting the flag on a fucking thong.
Yeah treason dude. Totally.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f-FvgmAbiCA
Let's outlaw the very thing the nation was build upon! Let's be a bunch of utter dicks by telling people what they can and can't do which doesn't harm anyone.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

joecoolfrog wrote:It would appear to be a pedophile organisation so time for the dunces hat and an extendedsuggs wrote:hmmmmmmm, maybe I was hasty.
But I was going on previous material from Jan, which suggested he might have issues with gay people.
As long as he doesn't mind, say, a 40 year old man having sex with a 16 year old man, then we're cool.
perusal of one corner of the room.