Moderator: Community Team

Whine much?zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

it isjako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
...DiM wrote:why am i not surprised johnny is listed?
zimmah wrote:it isjako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...xxtig12683xx wrote:zimmah wrote:it isjako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
What are you, the ratings police?![]()
-tig
Soloman wrote:As has been said many times all memebers are free to investigate to there hearts content other memebers regardless of level of involvement with said memebers although this is probaly better suited for cheating and abuse since it is about abusing the new system...xxtig12683xx wrote:zimmah wrote:it isjako wrote:i wouldnt say leaving mass 5s is abusing, maybe hes just a really easy rater.
What are you, the ratings police?![]()
-tig
I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat

I must have read that post wrong... Owen, did you just agree with me!!!!owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0
i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.

owenshooter wrote:i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
thank you, cute little baby!!! QFT!!!-0alyzMAMA wrote:why do we have ratings now anyway? is it cuz alot of people would leave bad feedback with mean words? in my opinion if someone leaves alot of 5stars it does not mean they are "abusing"anything because they probably had no problems with the player and liked how the game went. if they want to give out lots of stars sooo be it.

yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...owenshooter wrote:i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
But where does it tell us what is "average" and what is "bad" and what is "excellent"? Last time I checked, it's all a matter of opinion.Soloman wrote:yes if you move the arrow over the stars it tells you what each star level means now where it gets sticky like the old system is what someone considers average or above average, But again to answer your question lack built it into the system...owenshooter wrote:i am pretty much a newb at this system. can you please show me where this is defined by lack and not by zimmah? i think you are confusing HER RATING with an official rating. no, it is HER OPINION, not an official site rule. again, i'm a newb to this system, so please educate me. thanks.-0Soloman wrote:I think her argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.
78 out of 78 players that deserve a 5? i don't think so. either he's playing only with the very elite players (and i don't mean skills) or he is just hading out random 5's which is abusing the system.White Moose wrote:I wouldn't call that abusing, everyone has diffrent opinions on how their opponents plays. Perhaps those 2 just feels that if they just play a clean and good game that they deserve a 5've.zimmah wrote:post here the proof of people abusing the system (leaving mass 5's or mass 1's)
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... T24&page=2
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... name=Hrvat
so you're practictly telling it is true what i say.wicked wrote:zimmah, let's let people get used to the system first, and realize all 5's aren't really the way to go. I wouldn't classify it as abuse yet, as people are still getting used to how to rate.
yes, only i want to keep it simple for themSoloman wrote:I think his argument is it dilutes the process and creates a unreasonable expectation to give and get 5's for just average games thereby creating issues with people who follow the system based on the star levels as they are defined and those that do not uses ithe stars as defined.owenshooter wrote:show me where in the rules that leaving all 5's is abuse. sounds perfectly normal to me... are you now suddenly the Star Mod? this is just becoming funny. your new crusade is getting out of hand. again, please show me where leaving all 5's is abuse of the system.-0