Moderator: Community Team
RADAGA wrote:Did anyone noticed that is WAY too common to get 4 cards, two of each color, making no change possible?
Every time I see I have 2 blue, 1 red or 2 green, 1 blue or whatever, the chance the card I´ll get will be the ONLY ONE that wont make a match is much larger than the roughly 33% it is supposed to be.
Now, for instance, I have 4 games on, two of them I have 4 cards, two of each type.
How common you perceive this to happen?
In a word, no. When I have 2 and 1 after 3, I find that I fail to make a set with the 4th card, oh, about 1 out 3 times. Give or take, of course. Imagine that. Of course, I also tend to find that I get crappy dice but no more often than I get good dice and no more or less often than my opponents do as well. Another head scratcher, I know.RADAGA wrote:Did anyone noticed that is WAY too common to get 4 cards, two of each color, making no change possible?


No. I haven't noticed at all. I have noticed that I've cashed in a set of 3 and then my next three cards also become a set. This always seems to happen at just the right time. In escalaing games this has saved my bottom a couple of times and in regular games this has delayed defeat or ensured victory eariler.RADAGA wrote:Did anyone noticed that is WAY too common to get 4 cards, two of each color, making no change possible?

it isn't that common when you play mostly no card games and rely on strategy instead of luck.-0RADAGA wrote:How common you perceive this to happen?

Ahhhh, that would explain why I am at a loss regarding this thread.owenshooter wrote:it isn't that common when you play mostly no card games and rely on strategy instead of luck.-0RADAGA wrote:How common you perceive this to happen?
I hear she's been working on the card issue, and also a plugin to ensure that everyone gives you all 5's in the ratings.dividedbyzero wrote:We should probably see if Robinette can weigh in here. I'm sure she probably has a "workaround" for the cards...after all, her dice magic is well known even though it only works if you can follow some very exacting and precise instructions.
I thought that no cards relied more on drop + dice than anything else!owenshooter wrote:it isn't that common when you play mostly no card games and rely on strategy instead of luck.-0RADAGA wrote:How common you perceive this to happen?

Must be nice to be a mod....in the real world, 3 cards=set 33% of the time, on avg...4 cards=67% , and 5 cards=100% set.wacicha wrote:I will state that if I have 3 cards it is almost always a set and with 4 cards 99% of the time I have a set
Not even 67%MajorRT wrote:Must be nice to be a mod....in the real world, 3 cards=set 33% of the time, on avg...4 cards=67% , and 5 cards=100% set.wacicha wrote:I will state that if I have 3 cards it is almost always a set and with 4 cards 99% of the time I have a set
This may not be exactly true since there are not the same # of red ,green and blue cards, but it's close (except if your a mod)
Actually the number of red, green, and blue cards are the same, because the colour of card you get is random.MajorRT wrote:Must be nice to be a mod....in the real world, 3 cards=set 33% of the time, on avg...4 cards=67% , and 5 cards=100% set.wacicha wrote:I will state that if I have 3 cards it is almost always a set and with 4 cards 99% of the time I have a set
This may not be exactly true since there are not the same # of red ,green and blue cards, but it's close (except if your a mod)
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
