Moderator: Community Team


This is only true if you look at how many games a player has played in relation to their medals. Someone with 3000 games and 10 medals is obviously a one-sided player (and vice versa).Blitzaholic wrote:many medals demonstrates players good at many styles and versatility
few medals demonstrates players being good at slim ways or one way.
You mispelled 'a circle-jerk'.BadMoonRising wrote:You gonna have brunch together?
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
we are doing both actually, and the invitation has +1 on it, you know you wana DMDancing Mustard wrote:You mispelled 'a circle-jerk'.BadMoonRising wrote:You gonna have brunch together?
The answer is almost certainly 'yes'. I think that's why Johnny started this thread.
Or it could show who play 4,500 games instead of 150 games.Blitzaholic wrote:many medals demonstrates players good at many styles and versatility
few medals demonstrates players being good at slim ways or one way
this is another reason why I think it was a great idea, shows who plays all and shows who plays just a couple styles. the players with a few medals or less should for sure be high scored, for thats all they play, many medals with high score, well, thats just very impressive and difficult to do, hats off to the many medals with high scores, you are well rounded players, and I tips my hat. respects
with this said i dont think there is many, cause so so challenging to do.



another recycled one.. .sigh...-0Robinette wrote:


thanks for the appoligy and good luck with you 6 player escalating games ( yawn ). I seen you and Suckpedro starting some......Robinette wrote:Dear John,
I am soooooooooo sorry to have killed this thread with my incredibly clever and witty post. I never wanted to hurt you, but at the same time I find that it gives me great delight to do so. It really is time to say for me to say goodbye. But you will be okay, there are hundreds of multis out there to occupy your time, and more medals to gain.
That would be the game that you or blitz didn't win eh? I'm sure if I hadn't of taken you out sufficiently so you couldn't achieve your mission, it would of be deemed a 'GG'. Sorry to disappoint.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Im sure he will do a better job in those games because he cant get any worse than the game he just played with me and Blitz.
that's what blitz gets for rolling with his "B" team, instead of the "A" team consisting of myself and vace cooper... when blitz rolls with the bandits, he is unstoppable!!!-0Pedronicus wrote:Has suckpedro been put back on your ignore list?
That would be the game that you or blitz didn't win eh? I'm sure if I hadn't of taken you out sufficiently so you couldn't achieve your mission, it would of be deemed a 'GG'. Sorry to disappoint.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Im sure he will do a better job in those games because he cant get any worse than the game he just played with me and Blitz.

i believe they are talking about medals, not meds... that must be insanelyHotdoggie wrote:21 meds

not yet. i dont play 6 player standard games so theres no worries of you joining any of my games.Pedronicus wrote:Has suckpedro been put back on your ignore list?
That would be the game that you or blitz didn't win eh? I'm sure if I hadn't of taken you out sufficiently so you couldn't achieve your mission, it would of be deemed a 'GG'. Sorry to disappoint.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:Im sure he will do a better job in those games because he cant get any worse than the game he just played with me and Blitz.
think ur missing a medal on this picture Robinette, but no worries I have a good one for ya, check this outRobinette wrote:
Robinette - 4 medals
Janica is over the top amazing, i think the best ever in the sportnikola_milicki wrote: think ur missing a medal on this picture Robinette, but no worries I have a good one for ya, check this out
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Janica_Kosteli%C4%87
and read the first paragraph
