Moderator: Community Team
Ok heres the thing that comment is mildly stupid. Resistance fall of man. Sure its beatifull but its one of the best shooter games this year. The ps3 doesnt have many exclusive games but there games are just as good as an Xbox 360s just better looking. With blu-ray the games will be able to store much more info making a more indepth game. And you cant really say the Wii is a better system. It would be like comparing apples and oranges. They are 2 entirely different things. The Wii is going to make fun games yes. But can you really say that its a better system. The ps3 has wifi video capability and dvds. But is that really that bad to have? The Ps3 rlies on better looking graphics and more indepth gameplay.Here will shut up PS3 fans forever. I buy a gameing system to play games, not to have a dvd player, not to have a music player, not to have any other gay feature the PS3 has. I bought my wii for games, the PS3 dosent have games they have graphics poseing as games. Anyone who bought a PS3 to play games i feel sad for you :_( really i do.
That is complete BS, no one in their right mind ould make something for $900 and sell it for $600 and if this is by some miricle true then not only is sony just a bad company but they ar compltely retarded as well. The discussion is over better system, not who has the most new technology crammed into a boxHam wrote:Ps3. The reason ? Its got the best graphics out there the best technology and its at a great deal.Blu-ray is going to revolutionize games by making them able to process many more things.
Now most of you are going to fuss 600 bucks is not a great deal but it costs around 900 dollars for sony to make one PS3 so isnt that a good deal?
darvlay wrote:Get over it, people. It's just a crazy lookin' bear ejaculating into the waiting maw of an eager fox. Nothing more.
ok here it seems like you were describing the Wii and PS3 at the same timemr. incrediball wrote:well, look at it, it has wireless internet for free, backwards compatible, will be the first blu-ray player here in europe, (btw i've heard blu-ray players across the pond cost upwards of £800) it's almost like a computer, with a motion sensing controller and awesome graphics, the gameplay on the ps2 is also some of the best i've ever played (the only old-gen game i've found that could beat it is halo 2)
^now look at this and call me a graphics whore.

ps3 is fully backwards compatable...playstation always has beenwcaclimbing wrote:ok here it seems like you were describing the Wii and PS3 at the same timemr. incrediball wrote:well, look at it, it has wireless internet for free, backwards compatible, will be the first blu-ray player here in europe, (btw i've heard blu-ray players across the pond cost upwards of £800) it's almost like a computer, with a motion sensing controller and awesome graphics, the gameplay on the ps2 is also some of the best i've ever played (the only old-gen game i've found that could beat it is halo 2)
^now look at this and call me a graphics whore.
PS3 is NOT backwards compatible. Wii is.
PS3 does not have a motion sensing controller. Wii does.
IF halo 2 can beat the gameplay on the ps3, why dont you buy an xbox?
WHO CARES IF IT HAS BLUERAY or graphics that look real if its gonna cost $350 more than Wii, which has fun, simple games.
and the PS3 is not like a computer. go load a CPU game on your PS3 and see how it does.