ParadiceCity9 wrote:I find that unlikely because a lot of the time when I get a PM for someone to be removed from foe list, i'll remember why I put them on and say no. Then I try to join a game with them and it says I can't because I am on their foe list.
Help me understand this. The way I'm reading it, you have someone on your foe list (meaning, to me, that you don't want them joining games you're in), but then you get upset when you can't play a game they're in? That just seems like backwards logic.
ParadiceCity9 wrote: I don't suppose you read where I said he had 400 pts and have more negative feedback than he did positive.The post wasn't even about him. His case simply spurred me to realize that that shouldn't be a reason for foeing someone (to me!!!!!) I've even posted "Well I don't care about attitude in game chat...at all..so I guess that settles it. It just goes down to what people think is worthy of foeing." So I myself have ended the argument, stating that it just goes down to a matter of opinion, yet you come and stir the pot once again.
um... that would be PRE-EMPTIVE FOE-ING!!! do you even understand what you are TRYING to say in this thread? you had never played the guy, saw something about him that concerned you, and foed him. that is PRE-EMPTIVE! if some of these words have not been on your vocabulary tests yet, feel free to use the dictionary to look them up before you post...-0
Thorthoth,"Cloaking one's C&A fetish with moral authority and righteous indignation
makes it ever so much more erotically thrilling"
ParadiceCity9 wrote:That argument doesn't even make sense. Of course if I killed someone, they're gonna be dead.
Just as if you foes someone they are going to be on your foe list... But as you stated that being foed and being on someones foe list is two different things we really start to wonder. Me thinks I have to go with owen on this, you just don't know better yet.
ParadiceCity9 wrote: I don't suppose you read where I said he had 400 pts and have more negative feedback than he did positive.The post wasn't even about him. His case simply spurred me to realize that that shouldn't be a reason for foeing someone (to me!!!!!) I've even posted "Well I don't care about attitude in game chat...at all..so I guess that settles it. It just goes down to what people think is worthy of foeing." So I myself have ended the argument, stating that it just goes down to a matter of opinion, yet you come and stir the pot once again.
um... that would be PRE-EMPTIVE FOE-ING!!! do you even understand what you are TRYING to say in this thread? you had never played the guy, saw something about him that concerned you, and foed him. that is PRE-EMPTIVE! if some of these words have not been on your vocabulary tests yet, feel free to use the dictionary to look them up before you post...-0
The dictionary has an very important use in the paradice household. It is the main wheelblock behind the right rear tire of his home. Were he to use it, as you suggested, his whole house might roll down the hill.
Get it? He lives in a trailer. HAHAHAHAH
nothing wrong with a little bit of man on dog love.
I guess you're going to have to man up, I know that's difficult at 15 y.o. but you posted something that is completely asinine.
as·i·nine Audio Help /ˈæsəˌnaɪn/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[as-uh-nahyn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation –adjective 1. foolish, unintelligent, or silly; stupid: It is surprising that supposedly intelligent people can make such asinine statements.
Every post since your initial post, pretty much tells you that. Not one person who has responded on this thread agrees with you. Maybe when puberty is done, you will be able to think clearly with the head on your shoulders, and be able to participate in the forums, with more intelligent thoughts and posts. No offense, but let this thread die, and stop trying to defend a pointless position.
You just keep digging yourself deeper. You're not making any sense at all, and you haven't done so throughout this entire thread. You've basically argued against yourself this entire thread.
To everyone else,
I know we're trying to do a public service by trying to make Paradice see sense in what we're saying, but I feel that this is a lost cause. He can't seem to grasp our concepts, and I think owen pegged Paradice just perfectly. I think the best thing we could do would be to ignore him.
ParadiceCity9 wrote: I don't suppose you read where I said he had 400 pts and have more negative feedback than he did positive.The post wasn't even about him. His case simply spurred me to realize that that shouldn't be a reason for foeing someone (to me!!!!!) I've even posted "Well I don't care about attitude in game chat...at all..so I guess that settles it. It just goes down to what people think is worthy of foeing." So I myself have ended the argument, stating that it just goes down to a matter of opinion, yet you come and stir the pot once again.
um... that would be PRE-EMPTIVE FOE-ING!!! do you even understand what you are TRYING to say in this thread? you had never played the guy, saw something about him that concerned you, and foed him. that is PRE-EMPTIVE! if some of these words have not been on your vocabulary tests yet, feel free to use the dictionary to look them up before you post...-0
Nowhere in there did I say I had never played with the guy??
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I find that unlikely because a lot of the time when I get a PM for someone to be removed from foe list, i'll remember why I put them on and say no. Then I try to join a game with them and it says I can't because I am on their foe list.
Help me understand this. The way I'm reading it, you have someone on your foe list (meaning, to me, that you don't want them joining games you're in), but then you get upset when you can't play a game they're in? That just seems like backwards logic.
No I never said that I cared that I was on the foe list. I just think that it was dumb reasoning for putting me on there. That's all I've been trying to say, and have been saying.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:That argument doesn't even make sense. Of course if I killed someone, they're gonna be dead.
Just as if you foes someone they are going to be on your foe list... But as you stated that being foed and being on someones foe list is two different things we really start to wonder. Me thinks I have to go with owen on this, you just don't know better yet.
The act of foeing was the thing that I have a problem with. I don't care at all that I was on the foe list. Seriously, just think about it -- it makes sense.
I don't see what's so hard to understand for you all. I clearly stated that I figured out that it's a matter of opinion on what qualifies someone for the foe list. I've said that twice, er, three times now.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:The act of foeing was the thing that I have a problem with. I don't care at all that I was on the foe list. Seriously, just think about it -- it makes sense.
OK so you don't like someone not wanting to allow you in his games but you are fine with him not allowing you in his games? Yea that makes perfect sense...
Thezz you're a smart guy you should be able to figure this out. Let me make a comparison.
I, personally, don't like players who don't play well. *This is just an example, I wouldn't actually do this.* Say somebody makes a poor play, and for that reason, I put them on foe. Now, think of somebody putting me on their foe list in return for me foeing them as a play. The action of putting me on their foe list made me put them on mine. It's not too difficult.
If one person tells you that your are drunk, keep drinking. If two people tell you, then slow down. If a third person or more tells you that you are drunk, find a place to pass out. Time for you to pass out Paradice.
Allow me to explain, for the too-big-of-a-number-th time, what I've been trying to say, but obviously have been misunderstood.
I think it's dumb that people put other people on their foe list because they're on someone else's foe list. I put someone on foe after they put me on foe, but not because I was on the list, but because of the action of them putting me on. They put me on because I "suicided" on my target in a doodle assassin, but it wasn't even a suicide, I had another territ and that was my only chance of winning. I wasn't even eliminated. I find that a stupid reason for foeing someone, so I foed them. That's not so hard to understand, is it?
I have also stated twice I think in this thread, that I learned that it's a matter of opinion, what qualifies someone for the foe list. I said this, but it was never taken into account by all of you, and the thread continued. I essentially submitted, but all of you kept the thread going, not me. Don't tell me to submit. I already did.
More interesting if you make a poll Paradice... I would probably try to contact the person who foed me and ask for reasoning. If he/she becomes abusive or doesn't reply, I will foe them... But the good thing is I don't have any foes ... yet
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I find it annoying when people put me on their foe list, just because they're on mine. It doesn't make sense. That's a completely illegitimate reason for foeing someone.
p.s. -- Yes, I know I did this to someone, but I foed that person because of the fact that they foed me, not because I'm on their foe list.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:That argument doesn't even make sense. Of course if I killed someone, they're gonna be dead.
which was exactly the point mittens was making. you're not helping yourself here
ParadiceCity9 wrote:
daydream wrote:
ParadiceCity9 wrote:I find it annoying when people put me on their foe list, just because they're on mine. It doesn't make sense. That's a completely illegitimate reason for foeing someone.
p.s. -- Yes, I know I did this to someone, but I foed that person because of the fact that they foed me, not because I'm on their foe list.
^^Think about it, it makes sense.
this might be a strange and complicated concept to you, but maybe they did it for the same reason you did... it just seems like with the second part of your post you destroy the point you made with the first part.
oh, and now wait how the next thing he will be telling us about how great his grades in school are.
I find that unlikely because a lot of the time when I get a PM for someone to be removed from foe list, i'll remember why I put them on and say no. Then I try to join a game with them and it says I can't because I am on their foe list.
You obviously didn't even read...owen said I should go to summer school I was just proving to him I'm not an idiot.
just replying to the bit you bolded: then they might be putting you on because they think you are a jerk for putting them on for those reasons. and BAM! again, they did it for the same reason as you in your example. just amit that you are making no sense and i'll aly off you. no idea about the others of course
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Allow me to explain, for the too-big-of-a-number-th time, what I've been trying to say, but obviously have been misunderstood.
I think it's dumb that people put other people on their foe list because they're on someone else's foe list. I put someone on foe after they put me on foe, but not because I was on the list, but because of the action of them putting me on. *explaination* They put me on because I "suicided" on my target in a doodle assassin, but it wasn't even a suicide, I had another territ and that was my only chance of winning. I wasn't even eliminated. I find that a stupid reason for foeing someone, so I foed them. That's not so hard to understand, is it?
I have also stated twice I think in this thread, that I learned that it's a matter of opinion, what qualifies someone for the foe list. I said this, but it was never taken into account by all of you, and the thread continued. I essentially submitted, but all of you kept the thread going, not me. Don't tell me to submit. I already did.
I added that little part about me foeing after being foed, but not for being on the foe list in case that person came in and said that I did that, which is the only time I have foed after being foed. But if you actually read my last post, you'll know it wasn't in return for being foed, as you seem to think it was.
ParadiceCity9 wrote:Finally, a calm response. Thank you matroshka, that's all I wanted to hear.
Well that is just the same as we all have tried to get you to understand. You can't separate the foeing of someone and him being on your foe list. It is just 2 parts of the same action (as the death example tried to get to).
... yet
