Moderator: Community Team

Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Dancing Mustard wrote:Nah, f*ck all of these lily-livered naysayers Rusty.
Sign that contract and you're good to go, ain't no fancy lawyer in the world can touch you, no matter the outcome.
Just remember, swing from the waist, not from the shoulder... and follow through after impact. Gotta make sure that foetus gets mangled good and proper, or you'll just have to go through the whole process again in a weeks time.
These people became "Excessories" right? HAP you're a U.S. citizen right???HapSmo19 wrote:It's airtight.
No worse than me.Incandenza wrote:Am I a bad person for having been entertained by that?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Only, its not murder, because the baby isn't a person yet. At least according to federal law. Make sure when you do this, you are in a state where is is okay to carry out such idiotic procedures though.Juan_Bottom wrote:Except that, you are not a Dr...... and in some states you must even have the parents signed permission. So I believe the actual crime would be called...... MURDER...... so you know... that's something to consider... I just say this on MSNBC... huh...
By the way, the Haru Kick would be 10 times more effective, I believe. Ask Ryu...

No no, they become "Accessories". Like all the shit you didn't know you needed that they try to add on to the sale whenever you buy a cell phone at Radio Shack.Juan_Bottom wrote: These people became "Excessories" right? HAP you're a U.S. citizen right???


NICE image, I'm glad this thread was created so I could see it.wcaclimbing wrote:
I'm surprised that that image hasn't been posted yet....
..... anyway, i'm just guessing, but I think that would be a very bad idea to try.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Please leave my cock out of this.The1exile wrote:I suggest not touching that shit with a 60 foot pole and just directing her to this thread for the less morally inclined to give suggestions on alternatives to, as you so succinctly put it, getting someone to falcon punch her.

For a lot of reasons, I rather doubt you are serious.RustyMonkey wrote:It came up in a conversation about marriage, she told me how horrible she is with relationships and such. Basically, all she wants now is to not have a kid with her boyfriend.
I brought the idea of visiting an abortion clinic, but she said it's too complicated and asked me if I could falcon punch her.
Of course, this kind of hit me in the face. She's not an idiot or anything, the complete opposite. She also hasn't been on a had sex in months, so the baby must be pretty well developed. I jokingly made a comment about how she would charge me for assault, and she said that I could write a contract that I would have no financial, emotional, spiritual, or physical obligations to her and/or the baby and she would sign it. Would something like that be legally binding? Would it hold up well in court?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Incandenza wrote:Assuming that the OP is legit, proceeding with her request would be catastrophically ill-advised for many many many reasons, the foremost of which being that said course of action will almost certainly land you in prison.
Yeah those Ji-Jitsu skills he has are amazing.Juan_Bottom wrote:Except that, you are not a Dr...... and in some states you must even have the parents signed permission. So I believe the actual crime would be called...... MURDER...... so you know... that's something to consider... I just say this on MSNBC... huh...
By the way, the Haru Kick would be 10 times more effective, I believe. Ask Ryu...
This IS the guy who tried to seduce his coworker last week and asked us to see if his plan would work...Scott-Land wrote:Incandenza wrote:Assuming that the OP is legit, proceeding with her request would be catastrophically ill-advised for many many many reasons, the foremost of which being that said course of action will almost certainly land you in prison.
Not to mention the moral implications of such acts..... OMG- I surely hope this was some sick joke.
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
We're a sick community.Scott-Land wrote:Not to mention the moral implications of such acts..... OMG- I surely hope this was some sick joke.Incandenza wrote:Assuming that the OP is legit, proceeding with her request would be catastrophically ill-advised for many many many reasons, the foremost of which being that said course of action will almost certainly land you in prison.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
RustyMonkey wrote:It came up in a conversation about marriage, she told me how horrible she is with relationships and such. Basically, all she wants now is to not have a kid with her boyfriend.
I brought the idea of visiting an abortion clinic, but she said it's too complicated and asked me if I could falcon punch her.
Of course, this kind of hit me in the face. She's not an idiot or anything, the complete opposite. She also hasn't been on a had sex in months, so the baby must be pretty well developed. I jokingly made a comment about how she would charge me for assault, and she said that I could write a contract that I would have no financial, emotional, spiritual, or physical obligations to her and/or the baby and she would sign it. Would something like that be legally binding? Would it hold up well in court?