nagerous wrote:28 days and 19 pages?? You people suck!! I read this thread real-time, lets get the discussion flowing right now! Get it on the map then we won't lynch claimed cops before they've named claimed like freaking fools.
ok then. Frencehie-chan had interest in what you thought about LV's defense. I do too, so what do you think?
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
nagerous wrote:28 days and 19 pages?? You people suck!! I read this thread real-time, lets get the discussion flowing right now! Get it on the map then we won't lynch claimed cops before they've named claimed like freaking fools.
ok then. Frencehie-chan had interest in what you thought about LV's defense. I do too, so what do you think?
My thoughts were we should get 0ojakeo0 to spam his inbox, or get him replaced.... not lynched. I'm fed up with all these scapegoats. Rather than join up with the anti-skoff, anti-lovo alliance... I'm a freelancer this time round... I trust no-one... except for those that can be trusted.
nagerous wrote:Though saying that, our lynch today should probably be fireedud.
Any reason for this?
Sure he acted scummy day one regarding the lynch of the cop, but then again he is known to be a fool. The "rationalised" views of Ga7 and Flores putting subtle weakness on the cop claim was scummy too.
nagerous wrote:Though saying that, our lynch today should probably be fireedud.
Any reason for this?
Sure he acted scummy day one regarding the lynch of the cop, but then again he is known to be a fool. The "rationalised" views of Ga7 and Flores putting subtle weakness on the cop claim was scummy too.
true. I think I find the ones that rationalize more scummy. Also Frenchie-chan is rationalizing the lynch of Skoffin with the fact that her claim sucked, even if he knew that she probably was a cop. Then today he starts to push the lynch of LV, a submariner, and decides to go against the lead of ani that Ice brought up and still push for the scumariner lynch. Fos: Frenchie-chan
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
nagerous wrote:28 days and 19 pages?? You people suck!! I read this thread real-time, lets get the discussion flowing right now! Get it on the map then we won't lynch claimed cops before they've named claimed like freaking fools.
ok then. Frencehie-chan had interest in what you thought about LV's defense. I do too, so what do you think?
My thoughts were we should get 0ojakeo0 to spam his inbox, or get him replaced.... not lynched. I'm fed up with all these scapegoats. Rather than join up with the anti-skoff, anti-lovo alliance... I'm a freelancer this time round... I trust no-one... except for those that can be trusted.
You can trust me.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Hey nag. Good to see some activity in this thread..
While I still don't oppose a ga7 lynch at all, I think his rationalisation makes him slightly less scummy. At least he has a reason for keeping his vote on a claimed cop
icedagger wrote:Hey nag. Good to see some activity in this thread..
While I still don't oppose a ga7 lynch at all, I think his rationalisation makes him slightly less scummy. At least he has a reason for keeping his vote on a claimed cop
HOW? Rationalization means to make up stuff you know is false to make you feel better about what you did, or look better. How is that not scummy?
from m-w: to bring into accord with reason or cause something to seem reasonable
to SEEM reasonable. Not actually be reasonable, but SEEM.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
having nag here is quite refreshing, our activity was going stale, but i cant completely make my mind about going for fireedud lynch, and i find slightly suspiscious that you point him as an ideal lynch but then make us remember how "foolish" this player can be (almost saying "him is just a stupid townie") so why nag, why we should vote him or not vote him?
FloresDelMal wrote:having nag here is quite refreshing, our activity was going stale, but i cant completely make my mind about going for fireedud lynch, and i find slightly suspiscious that you point him as an ideal lynch but then make us remember how "foolish" this player can be (almost saying "him is just a stupid townie") so why nag, why we should vote him or not vote him?
have you avoided what I presented on your lover? And what about the ani lynch which is still an option?
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
icedagger wrote:Hey nag. Good to see some activity in this thread..
While I still don't oppose a ga7 lynch at all, I think his rationalisation makes him slightly less scummy. At least he has a reason for keeping his vote on a claimed cop
HOW? Rationalization means to make up stuff you know is false to make you feel better about what you did, or look better. How is that not scummy?
from m-w: to bring into accord with reason or cause something to seem reasonable
to SEEM reasonable. Not actually be reasonable, but SEEM.
Hehe. Just because someone's trying to make something seem reasonable, doesn't mean it's not. Half of mafia is trying to rationalise people's actions..
icedagger wrote:Hey nag. Good to see some activity in this thread..
While I still don't oppose a ga7 lynch at all, I think his rationalisation makes him slightly less scummy. At least he has a reason for keeping his vote on a claimed cop
HOW? Rationalization means to make up stuff you know is false to make you feel better about what you did, or look better. How is that not scummy?
from m-w: to bring into accord with reason or cause something to seem reasonable
to SEEM reasonable. Not actually be reasonable, but SEEM.
Hehe. Just because someone's trying to make something seem reasonable, doesn't mean it's not. Half of mafia is trying to rationalise people's actions..
>_> No I think you're getting my point wrong. Frenchie-chan knows what he did was stupid, and he's rationalizating to make it SEEM like it was townie like. He has to make it SEEM townie like because it wasn't. You get what I mean. And you don't try to rationalize some's actions, you try to figure out why they did stuff or something. Don't know the word. Rationalizating is using fake things to make it SEEM that way.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Well I don't know why we're arguing over the definition of a word. From his perspective, he wasn't going to say why he was voting at the time if what he's saying is true, as it would have blown ace's cover. While I don't nessecarily believe he's trying to act in town's best interests (in fact I think he's the scummiest here), while keeping your vote on a claimed cop for no reason would be pretty indefensible, the fact that there was a seeming counterclaim makes it less so in my opinion
icedagger wrote:Well I don't know why we're arguing over the definition of a word. From his perspective, he wasn't going to say why he was voting at the time if what he's saying is true, as it would have blown ace's cover. While I don't nessecarily believe he's trying to act in town's best interests (in fact I think he's the scummiest here), while keeping your vote on a claimed cop for no reason would be pretty indefensible, the fact that there was a seeming counterclaim makes it less so in my opinion
there were 6 people who left their votes. Maybe we should see why.
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
icedagger wrote:Well I don't know why we're arguing over the definition of a word. From his perspective, he wasn't going to say why he was voting at the time if what he's saying is true, as it would have blown ace's cover. While I don't nessecarily believe he's trying to act in town's best interests (in fact I think he's the scummiest here), while keeping your vote on a claimed cop for no reason would be pretty indefensible, the fact that there was a seeming counterclaim makes it less so in my opinion
there were 6 people who left their votes. Maybe we should see why.
icedagger wrote:Well I don't know why we're arguing over the definition of a word. From his perspective, he wasn't going to say why he was voting at the time if what he's saying is true, as it would have blown ace's cover. While I don't nessecarily believe he's trying to act in town's best interests (in fact I think he's the scummiest here), while keeping your vote on a claimed cop for no reason would be pretty indefensible, the fact that there was a seeming counterclaim makes it less so in my opinion
there were 6 people who left their votes. Maybe we should see why.
Reasons so far:
Frenchie-chan: Disbelieved Cop Claim
Fircoal: For the Lulz
flores: Unknown
Ace: DEAD - Town
Clive: Unknown
Fireedud: Unknown
CMC: Unknown
EBWOP Ace is dead Town, that leaves Flores, Clive, Fire and CMC to explain, or if they have already and I forgot to resay
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
icedagger wrote:Cmc said something vague about lots of other people voting her.. yeah great reason that.
But we're not setting the bar very high if your "for the lulz" counts as a valid reason are we?
for the lulz is a valid reason because it's true. It's also valid in the sense that if I was scum, I'd probably want something a lot more town like sounding. Also I believe I even said it during the day
Vote: Mandy
Eddie35: hi everyone
Serbia: YOU IDIOT! What is THAT supposed to be? Are you even TRYING to play this game?! Kill the idiot NOW please!
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Clive wrote:Nag, have you looked at how she got lynnched?
Voting her was not scummy...
However, Fire hasn't been helpful I could go with a wagon on him if it went that way, but i'd rather LV.
The way his wagon refuses to pick up makes me think scum aren't on it, cos he's scum.
You say without voting him... get some balls man. While he's been less subtle about it, neither of you have really contributed anything since getting skoffin lynched
Vote Lovo anyway he doesn't seem to want to be reaplaced.. or play?