Any and all points of view ... go ahead ...
But please in a General Discussion appropriate way
Alternatively, or in addition, please see this thread's twin in the Flame Wars forum ...
Moderator: Community Team


virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
I agree.edbeard wrote:it would definitely increase at first (since certain peoples' playground would be gone), but in the long run it'd decrease. send a message that flaming is not acceptable behaviour. make examples of people who aren't playing well with others. as long as offenses are punished, it'll change the makeup of the forum.
right now people will flame and be told, "take it to flame wars guys". that says it's ok to flame until someone tells you not to. Or that if you flame elsewhere, it'll just get moved to flame wars later so no big deal.
get rid of it. get rid of that immature behaviour.


That's funny, this is the first forum I've seen with one...Anarkistsdream wrote:Sorry, but if you don't let it stay, it would never work. Almost EVERY forum has one (Please realize I said 'almost')
Many people here like to go there. If you don't want it, don't read it. No one forces you to Flame Wars.

Ray Rider wrote:I agree.edbeard wrote:it would definitely increase at first (since certain peoples' playground would be gone), but in the long run it'd decrease. send a message that flaming is not acceptable behaviour. make examples of people who aren't playing well with others. as long as offenses are punished, it'll change the makeup of the forum.
right now people will flame and be told, "take it to flame wars guys". that says it's ok to flame until someone tells you not to. Or that if you flame elsewhere, it'll just get moved to flame wars later so no big deal.
get rid of it. get rid of that immature behaviour.
I've only gone into the flame wars a couple times, and every time I do, I'm amazed the low level of intelligence displayed there. I think it would greatly improve this website in the long run if it was deleted.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Ditocoaf wrote:That's funny, this is the first forum I've seen with one...Anarkistsdream wrote:Sorry, but if you don't let it stay, it would never work. Almost EVERY forum has one (Please realize I said 'almost')
Many people here like to go there. If you don't want it, don't read it. No one forces you to Flame Wars.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
That won't happen.Timminz wrote:Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
Anarkistsdream wrote:That won't happen.Timminz wrote:Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
I'm glad you guys live in this Utopia, but it isn't real.
edbeard wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:That won't happen.Timminz wrote:Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
I'm glad you guys live in this Utopia, but it isn't real.
if it doesn't happen then they'll get banned and we won't have the problem. either way (them stopping or not stopping), this behaviour won't be around CC anymore.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.

And apparently you haven't read the thread properly.hwhrhett wrote:i love the way that all the people defending flame wars are saying that by having flame wars it keeps flames out of the other forums.
i dont think these people have been paying attention.
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
edbeard wrote:Anarkistsdream wrote:That won't happen.Timminz wrote:Or maybe go vent their anonymous internet rage somewhere else.Anarkistsdream wrote:At least the people that are openly trolling have a place to do it in relative safety. Get rid of it, and they are forced to join you 'higher beings'...
I'm glad you guys live in this Utopia, but it isn't real.
if it doesn't happen then they'll get banned and we won't have the problem. either way (them stopping or not stopping), this behaviour won't be around CC anymore.
yeah brilliant plan - make allies of all the lippy, loud-mouthed, belligerent, abusive miscreants on the site.. well the site has been short on drama recentlytimmytuttut88 wrote:It would be hilarious to see all the FW people who usually hate each other, working together to get it back.
oh ya, and my opinion:
Let FW stay, some of the stuff there is pretty funny...
virus90 wrote: I think Anarkist is a valuable asset to any game.
CC just seems to be making too many changes too fast, i'm not even used to the new forum yet...jiminski wrote:yeah brilliant plan - make allies of all the lippy, loud-mouthed, belligerent, abusive miscreants on the site.. well the site has been short on drama recentlytimmytuttut88 wrote:It would be hilarious to see all the FW people who usually hate each other, working together to get it back.
oh ya, and my opinion:
Let FW stay, some of the stuff there is pretty funny...!
Anarkistsdream wrote:And apparently you haven't read the thread properly.hwhrhett wrote:i love the way that all the people defending flame wars are saying that by having flame wars it keeps flames out of the other forums.
i dont think these people have been paying attention.

completely agree, and while it there is a certain amount of dick-tude that's caused by FW, most if it is kept there and most of it is completely harmless. i've flamed prowler, deliaselene, owenshooter, and many others but have also played games with them on the site and while much of what we say seems vehement, it's more like r-rated humor which the mods seem to hate outside of flame wars.Anarkistsdream wrote:How about we try this... Let's use FACTS to state our points as opposed to feelings or conjectures...
I'll start.![]()
Flame Wars would be gone, so flaming would be gone? That's your ingenious peoples' opisions, right?
Do the multi hunters stop there from being multis? No
Do the Suggestions/Bug Reports forum stop there from being problems? No
Does appointing admins to control the site stop there from being friction? No (Just look at the Twill/Wicked Debacle.)
Why you people think that just because there is no symptom means the disease would go away is ridiculous.
Not to mention, most of you don't go in FW anyway, so why do you care? Honestly, what makes you give a shit about it? For the people that use it, it helps relieve stress that they WILL otherwise take out on the community at large.
And, if it doesn't have direct affect on your life, why post in this thread at all? Where is your own rage and indignation coming from?
can't you just let the storm calm for a few moments!?timmytuttut88 wrote:CC just seems to be making too many changes too fast, i'm not even used to the new forum yet...jiminski wrote:yeah brilliant plan - make allies of all the lippy, loud-mouthed, belligerent, abusive miscreants on the site.. well the site has been short on drama recentlytimmytuttut88 wrote:It would be hilarious to see all the FW people who usually hate each other, working together to get it back.
oh ya, and my opinion:
Let FW stay, some of the stuff there is pretty funny...!
I am usually a FW regular, and I have even flamed trapyoung several times, but have I flamed ONE PERSON in a chat? No. Have I flamed people out side of FW? No.trapyoung wrote:completely agree, and while it there is a certain amount of dick-tude that's caused by FW, most if it is kept there and most of it is completely harmless. i've flamed prowler, deliaselene, owenshooter, and many others but have also played games with them on the site and while much of what we say seems vehement, it's more like r-rated humor which the mods seem to hate outside of flame wars.Anarkistsdream wrote:How about we try this... Let's use FACTS to state our points as opposed to feelings or conjectures...
I'll start.![]()
Flame Wars would be gone, so flaming would be gone? That's your ingenious peoples' opisions, right?
Do the multi hunters stop there from being multis? No
Do the Suggestions/Bug Reports forum stop there from being problems? No
Does appointing admins to control the site stop there from being friction? No (Just look at the Twill/Wicked Debacle.)
Why you people think that just because there is no symptom means the disease would go away is ridiculous.
Not to mention, most of you don't go in FW anyway, so why do you care? Honestly, what makes you give a shit about it? For the people that use it, it helps relieve stress that they WILL otherwise take out on the community at large.
And, if it doesn't have direct affect on your life, why post in this thread at all? Where is your own rage and indignation coming from?
also, while people are constantly badgered in the normal threads to keep posts on topic to the OP's desires, flame wars is actually much more fun to participate in a conversation in because of the low amount of regulation. an actual conversation is allowed to occur and i feel that a large group would be alienated should it be removed.
are things that bad that map foundry is soooo negatively effected by flame wars' presence. i think not.