But on topic, the way I see this ending is when Lack funds his retirement by selling the site to some larger corporation, who then go and screw it all up. And really, how do we know this site isn't already run by Hasbro?
Moderator: Community Team
Couldn't Lack keep the company, but hire a bunch of people to do the work he does now for him?oaktown wrote:the gameplay used at CC is public domain - it was developed before hasbro boxed the game and called it "Risk." Lack has as much right to make this game as Hasbro or anybody else does - he just can't steal any of Hasbro's artwork, or call it "Risk."
But on topic, the way I see this ending is when Lack funds his retirement by selling the site to some larger corporation, who then go and screw it all up. And really, how do we know this site isn't already run by Hasbro?
My guess is mid 30's to early 40's.Ryall55 wrote:How old is Lack anyway

Hehehe....lanyards wrote:My guess is mid 30's to early 40's.Ryall55 wrote:How old is Lack anyway
--lanyards
Scrabulous was shutdown then reopened in no time under a new name.owenshooter wrote:where do you get your info? scarbulous is not dead, it is up and running and i'm still a member. i was just playing a game before i came over here to check my games. so, wrong about that... hasbro knows about this site, and if the classic map were removed, they would have zero ground to stand on. hell, even that map isn't the same as hasbro. the rules and gameplay are different, and the maps on this site are wholly original. i love all the speculation and "facts" that people use that are just not true...-0THE KING65 wrote:Honestly, I just think this site is "flying under the radar" and no one at HASBRO has seen it yet. If you google search "risk" it doesnt come up for many pages.
Once they see it, and create a very similar game, they will most likely shut down this site.
Scrabulous was barely making any money and had like 50 million users and it was shut down.
All HASBRO would have to do is file a copyright suit, or better yet just threaten to do so and this site would have no choice but to shut down.
Not quite sure what you mean...Risk has been around for multiple decades, probably even longer than lack himself.oaktown wrote:the gameplay used at CC is public domain - it was developed before hasbro boxed the game and called it "Risk." Lack has as much right to make this game as Hasbro or anybody else does - he just can't steal any of Hasbro's artwork, or call it "Risk."
But on topic, the way I see this ending is when Lack funds his retirement by selling the site to some larger corporation, who then go and screw it all up. And really, how do we know this site isn't already run by Hasbro?
Optimus Prime wrote:Hehehe....lanyards wrote:My guess is mid 30's to early 40's.Ryall55 wrote:How old is Lack anyway
--lanyards


um... yeah... right... instead of making stuff up, why don't you just got to http://www.scrabulous.com, and see for yourself. those two brothers are alive and kicking... and they are way more at risk than CC. they use the ACTUAL scrabble board and it's rules. CC does not use the actual risk board and/or it's rules. the content of the site is wholly original. slayer, i don't understand how hard it is for someone to go to a site they claim is defunct, before posting an outright falsehood.-0SlayerQC wrote:Scrabulous was shutdown then reopened in no time under a new name.

did you miss the part about the news?owenshooter wrote:um... yeah... right... instead of making stuff up, why don't you just got to http://www.scrabulous.com, and see for yourself. those two brothers are alive and kicking... and they are way more at risk than CC. they use the ACTUAL scrabble board and it's rules. CC does not use the actual risk board and/or it's rules. the content of the site is wholly original. slayer, i don't understand how hard it is for someone to go to a site they claim is defunct, before posting an outright falsehood.-0SlayerQC wrote:Scrabulous was shutdown then reopened in no time under a new name.
lol, I know what you mean, I saw that thread.jbrettlip wrote:Welcome back racist!!!! I guess you hate the caps shift unlock key, as much as you hate some people in America!!
doesn't matter what you thought or what you think you heard, you are still wrong. it is a stand alone site that exists outside of facebook and is a total rip of scrabble. same board, same rules, same graphics. CC has different rules, different and original maps, and could exist without the classic map, which isn't a direct copy of the risk board. sigh...-0SlayerQC wrote: I thought scrabulous was only on facebook anyways, which is what the newscast was talking about.

... sorry to "teach you" but 10 000 premium members @ 25 usd each is 250 000 dollars, not 25k !!Georgerx7di wrote:there are 23,000 members. Lets say 10,000 of them are premium. Premium cost $25/year. That means that lack is making about $25,000/year off CC, that's not including merchandise. Pretty soon he will be able to make a living off running this site alone, if he doesn't already. I don't see any reason why he would stop doing this. If anything I think that he would continue to put more time into it.
welcome to two days ago...-0SissitSuomesta wrote:... sorry to "teach you" but 10 000 premium members @ 25 usd each is 250 000 dollars, not 25k !!

Im sure your an expert on copyright laws, but you're wrong.owenshooter wrote:um... yeah... right... instead of making stuff up, why don't you just got to http://www.scrabulous.com, and see for yourself. those two brothers are alive and kicking... and they are way more at risk than CC. they use the ACTUAL scrabble board and it's rules. CC does not use the actual risk board and/or it's rules. the content of the site is wholly original. slayer, i don't understand how hard it is for someone to go to a site they claim is defunct, before posting an outright falsehood.-0SlayerQC wrote:Scrabulous was shutdown then reopened in no time under a new name.
What? Do you think your opinion is more important than everybody elses or something? Is that why you felt the need to type it in caps? Or were you just afraid that people might not read such incoherent and poorly written prose if you didn't make it big enough?Soloman wrote:1 THING WILL KILL CC, HASBRO AND WITH ECONOMIC TIMES AS THEY ARE AND CC MAKING MONEY OFF OF NOT ONLY PREMIUMS BUT MERCHANDISING, HASBRO WILL SOON COME KNOCKING FOR THERE CUT AND POSSIBLY SHUT DOWN THE SITE OR TAKE IT OVER...
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
These scenario is very possible,but who knows maybe Lack childrens decide to continue hes workBut on topic, the way I see this ending is when Lack funds his retirement by selling the site to some larger corporation, who then go and screw it all up. And really, how do we know this site isn't already run by Hasbro?
listen, you aren't even clever enough to type in http://www.scrabulous.com/ to see if the site is gone before publicly declaring it as part of your argument. you have zero footing when one of the main tennants of your argument is farcical, imaginary, gossip, and a plain out fabrication. scrabulous is alive and kicking and using the same name as before. i'm playing jbrettlip right now, in a game on scrabulous, over some coffee... once you base an argument on such a glaring fabrication, you can't really try to just continue dumping buckets of water over the side of your sinking boat, that is your argument. scrabulous is doing fine, and they are an OBVIOUS infringement. show me where hasbro has proprietary rights over ANY map on this site. i am sure DiM, Gimil, Yeti_C, andy and the rest of the map boys would love to get some of that hasbro money for all the hard work, since hasbro seems to own them, according to you. but wait, you are the same guy basing your entire argument on http://www.scrabulous.com/ being shut down by hasbro!!!-0THE KING65 wrote:Im sure your an expert on copyright laws, but you're wrong.

owenshooter wrote:listen, you aren't even clever enough to type in http://www.scrabulous.com/ to see if the site is gone before publicly declaring it as part of your argument. you have zero footing when one of the main tennants of your argument is farcical, imaginary, gossip, and a plain out fabrication. scrabulous is alive and kicking and using the same name as before. i'm playing jbrettlip right now, in a game on scrabulous, over some coffee... once you base an argument on such a glaring fabrication, you can't really try to just continue dumping buckets of water over the side of your sinking boat, that is your argument. scrabulous is doing fine, and they are an OBVIOUS infringement. show me where hasbro has proprietary rights over ANY map on this site. i am sure DiM, Gimil, Yeti_C, andy and the rest of the map boys would love to get some of that hasbro money for all the hard work, since hasbro seems to own them, according to you. but wait, you are the same guy basing your entire argument on http://www.scrabulous.com/ being shut down by hasbro!!!-0THE KING65 wrote:Im sure your an expert on copyright laws, but you're wrong.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong