Moderator: Community Team

i dont trust politicians, they have a way of bullshit their way through, and this is my first time seeing this role, i didnt knew it existed, can someone tell me which is the most common alignment of this role? ill base my vote on that.lord voldemort wrote:guys im a politician...votes stolen was clives day 1 and 2 and ga7 last nite..
thats role claim. ill give more in like 9 hours when i get home from baseball
town, but he never did say more.FloresDelMal wrote:i dont trust politicians, they have a way of bullshit their way through, and this is my first time seeing this role, i didnt knew it existed, can someone tell me which is the most common alignment of this role? ill base my vote on that.lord voldemort wrote:guys im a politician...votes stolen was clives day 1 and 2 and ga7 last nite..
thats role claim. ill give more in like 9 hours when i get home from baseball
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.

Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
sometimes you get just really piss off by submarinersFircoal wrote:LV is probably telling the truth, but I'd also like a role name. I'd also like to know why Clive has jumped off of it at the first sight of a claim, and is now voting the next biggest scumariner.
I'm extreme on the other side, I really will give people chance after chance.FloresDelMal wrote:sometimes you get just really piss off by submarinersFircoal wrote:LV is probably telling the truth, but I'd also like a role name. I'd also like to know why Clive has jumped off of it at the first sight of a claim, and is now voting the next biggest scumariner.if it was on my hand i could blacklist all of them
but then, i am a bit extreme
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
i guess you are just kinder than me, and because i feel in an evil mood, and because i dont remember if i unvoted, unvote vote lovo til i get a role name that absolutely proves him innocent, because as i said, i dislike politicians, i dont trust them, and no matter how we look at things, stealing someones vote doesnt sound very townish.Fircoal wrote:
I'm extreme on the other side, I really will give people chance after chance.
since this is my first experience with this role and obviously you know it better, ill trust you in this one babe.nagerous wrote:I'm pretty sure he can be trusted and is town.
nagerous wrote:Right I've done most the re-reading.
Vote Fircoal for being mafia
Ok, what's the deal with that? You give absolutely no arguments or reasons for these accusations, I'm not sure if you were trying to fish or if you actually had a clue there. First one interests me a bit more as so far Fir looked like one of the most likely trustable.nagerous wrote:Though saying that, our lynch today should probably be fireedud.
Something strikes me as rather odd there, while talking of scapegoats I had the feeling the most likely one for today was Animorph, not Lovo... On which in fact you didn't voice any opinion.nagerous wrote:My thoughts were we should get 0ojakeo0 to spam his inbox, or get him replaced.... not lynched. I'm fed up with all these scapegoats. Rather than join up with the anti-skoff, anti-lovo alliance... I'm a freelancer this time round... I trust no-one... except for those that can be trusted.
So on the same line there is the first argument you put for a Fireedud lynch, and at the same time you excuse it. WTF?nagerous wrote:Sure he acted scummy day one regarding the lynch of the cop, but then again he is known to be a fool. The "rationalised" views of Ga7 and Flores putting subtle weakness on the cop claim was scummy too.
WIFOM. Sure a Lovo replacement would be better but you perfectly know that the last times Lovo was scum he submarined. And actually played in a recent game where he was town. So coming from you, it strikes me as odd.nagerous wrote:Would scum not want to play though ? That is the question.
FOS IceDagger for pushing the easy lynch for the day when we can just get a replacement in.
nagerous wrote:Pre-Emptive HFOS on anyone that hammers Lord Voldemort.
We MUST wait for a claim.
The problem I see with this is it's true that politician could perfectly be a scum role. He didn't even give a role name, and somehow I don't think we'll see him post again today. On one hand, his politician claim is trustable and proven and it's normally a town role, on the other the whole thing with you trying your best to get the attention away from Lovo since you replaced, then putting emphasis on not lynching him without knowing what's up, could be that you KNEW he would come with a claim that can be easily interpreted as town.nagerous wrote:I'm pretty sure he can be trusted and is town.
I wasn't rationalizing then, I was giving my opinion on why I felt the wagon on Skoffin was justified and had a hard time picking suspects from it solely based on that. I won't repeat my day 2 posts about it though, but the fact it also concerned me was secundary.Fircoal wrote:true. I think I find the ones that rationalize more scummy. Also Frenchie-chan is rationalizing the lynch of Skoffin with the fact that her claim sucked, even if he knew that she probably was a cop. Then today he starts to push the lynch of LV, a submariner, and decides to go against the lead of ani that Ice brought up and still push for the scumariner lynch. Fos: Frenchie-chan
Fircoal wrote:>_> No I think you're getting my point wrong. Frenchie-chan knows what he did was stupid, and he's rationalizating to make it SEEM like it was townie like. He has to make it SEEM townie like because it wasn't. You get what I mean. And you don't try to rationalize some's actions, you try to figure out why they did stuff or something. Don't know the word. Rationalizating is using fake things to make it SEEM that way.
I think Icedagger puts it quite sensibly (at least on the part of providing a reason to vote Skoff, not on the scummiest oneicedagger wrote:Well I don't know why we're arguing over the definition of a word. From his perspective, he wasn't going to say why he was voting at the time if what he's saying is true, as it would have blown ace's cover. While I don't nessecarily believe he's trying to act in town's best interests (in fact I think he's the scummiest here), while keeping your vote on a claimed cop for no reason would be pretty indefensible, the fact that there was a seeming counterclaim makes it less so in my opinion
You admit there was no reasoning behind keeping your vote on Skoff post-claim. I guess that makes sense that from your point of view then, actually having a reason would better look scummy so that you don't get in deep shit.Fircoal wrote:Reasons so far:
Frenchie-chan: Disbelieved Cop Claim
Fircoal: For the Lulz
flores: Unknown
Ace: Unknown
Clive: Unknown
Fireedud: Unknown
CMC: Unknown
WIFOM. Sorry but you claim you had no actual reason to keep your vote on Skoffin, and you consciously did it. How on earth is that more valid? And sure it's not like you couldn't have found a reason afterwards, there was certainly room for it, but you didn't say anything relevant after Skoffin claimed so that would have been kinda hard to swallow. Well anyway, that is the first thing I see from you that makes me tick and that list is still a pretty good idea so I don't find it so incriminating, but that "for the lulz" reason is something I find hard to swallow from a townie. FOS Fircoal & FloresFircoal wrote:for the lulz is a valid reason because it's true. It's also valid in the sense that if I was scum, I'd probably want something a lot more town like sounding. Also I believe I even said it during the day
Makes me think he's looking for any opportunity to not get himself looked on too carefully.fireedud wrote:Vote Clive He's the best lead we have right now.
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
ga7 wrote: WIFOM. Sorry but you claim you had no actual reason to keep your vote on Skoffin, and you consciously did it. How on earth is that more valid? And sure it's not like you couldn't have found a reason afterwards, there was certainly room for it, but you didn't say anything relevant after Skoffin claimed so that would have been kinda hard to swallow. Well anyway, that is the first thing I see from you that makes me tick and that list is still a pretty good idea so I don't find it so incriminating, but that "for the lulz" reason is something I find hard to swallow from a townie. FOS Fircoal & Flores
then i just went off the comp and when i arrived someone else had voted her, and the whole affair was over, sure, we fucked up, but still she could have claimed her flavor, we are on a themed game ppl.FloresDelMal wrote:i think she's scum just having fun and making us feel anxious about voting her.
check the votes again babe, i know that you just forgot my ani vote, except if this time around i did got my vote stolen.militant wrote:Vote Count9 alive, 5 to lynch.
- LoVo (1) Clive
- Ice (1) Ani
- Fireedud (2) Nag, Clive
- Clive (1) Fircoal
2 days and about 3 hours left
... so the only thing you grasped from my conclusions is an incorrect statement and that I'm somehow scummy. I wonder why I botheredicedagger wrote:Ga7- you've fos'd everyone in the game except Clive now. You're just appearing more and more scummy to me- it's more instinctual and nothing I can prove though. I won't do anything till Lovo claims but I'd be very happy with a ga7 lynch today
Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Frenchie-chan, look at this quote. I stated it was for the lulz pretty much after the lynch. Also you should know me well enough, that I wouldn't get into fights over things I don't believe or not care about. While I defend some things I like quite often. If I hadn't voted Skoff for the lulz, then why would I feel the need to argue with Dito about it after? If it was an excuse I wouldn't have minded because it wasn't my true reasoning. But because it was, I felt a bit insultedDitocoaf wrote:lynching someone just for the laughs, despite a cop claim (which admittedly makes it funnier) is hardly trying to win the game.Fircoal wrote:are you accusing me of not trying to win? O_O No, I am trying to win.Ditocoaf wrote:Well, then, you're an asshole for making a mockery of Millitant's game. Why does he deserve to have his game be the one where people don't try to win?Fircoal wrote:not always, Actually I just wanted to lynch Skoffin for the lolz.Ditocoaf wrote:It's all part of the "hurry-up-and-lynch-somebody" mentality with which too many people play this game. These games are conducted with all the logic and consideration of the Salem witch trials.I pretty much always would try to win. no game is different from the other. See Dito, you don't know the full past. Part of the reason I've wanted to get some people lynched day 1 for no reason, relies there. Being well known and liked here can lead to it. It's happened quite a bit to me, part of the reason why I want it to happen to others now.
Edit: Also with that being said, part of how Mafia is played now, or at least how I play it know is influenced by that, while I may accidentally scumarine (cause I'm lazy) it doesn't mean that I don't want to try. And with all the day 1 lynches now, it's basically lynch a friend, or that's how I see it. I don't mean to mock any game. Actually it's not just Mili's is more what this edit is for. While you're looking, maybe you'll see I've been happy to lynch someone for quite a lot of games for those little reasons.Say what you will but that's how the bricks fell.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.