Moderator: Cartographers
I don't think that this region would look at all good in a middle east styled map. I like how he is doing it now. Icy and simple. That pretty much describes the region.Incandenza wrote:I don't suppose Middle East style watermarks for the continents would be possible...
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong

It is a very clean and sharp looking map, but it isn't quite up to the level of the Iceland map, nothing on this site is in my opinion. I'm excited to play this one when you get it finished, lanyards. You know I love a good clean map.militant wrote:The map looks awesome, it looks nice and simple which is really good, it reminds me a little of the new Iceland map for the same reason. I am really liking the look of it. Nice one Lanyards
if canada is in america, then russia is in asia. the legend is inconsistent. the continents can be either be russian, american (of the usa) and canadian or asian and american (of north and south america). having only russian and american clearly implies that yukon is part of the usa and will be interpreted by many people as such.lanyards wrote:Canada is in America. Right?Joodoo wrote:Yukon is part of Canada, not USA.
Maybe you should make it North American Continents instead of American continents to make it more geographically correct.
the ports need to be a neutral-looking colour (white or grey, perhaps?) rather than being the same colour as one (or two!) of the continents. the attack routes from the ports are very clear.Coleman wrote:I'm a bit confused by the ports being the same color as two corresponding continents instead of their own color.That's the only improvement I can see, as their being their own color would help further clarify that they are not a part of any existing continent.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
NO! Sorry, was being lazy. I'll work on it sometime soon.gimil wrote:*prods*
Whats going on lanyards? It also getting to the time I have to send this to the heap. You dont want that do you?

you got a couple of days mate! Otherwise I get oaktown to put it in the can! (I wont be here)lanyards wrote:NO! Sorry, was being lazy. I'll work on it sometime soon.gimil wrote:*prods*
Whats going on lanyards? It also getting to the time I have to send this to the heap. You dont want that do you?![]()
--lanyards
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
? I don't see that at all ?whitestazn88 wrote:did anyone notice that the colors have the exact same like... hue as the charleston map does?

Nope. Just being lazy. I'll get back to it soon.Mr. Squirrel wrote:I sure hope that this isn't dropped, I was really looking forward to this map.






I like the new style!lanyards wrote:cted a few territory names, and changed the style.
Most of the people commenting before I'm sure are long gone from here so maybe I'll be getting some new perspective
Is the new style the direction I should go or should I go back to the cool colors?
