I agree...I don't think anybody should be able to play it because you don't like certain aspects of it.Jamie wrote:I am officially stating my opinion that the Map World 2.0 was ill concieved by its creator, and not thought out at all. I don't know how the map made it as far as actually getting on the maps to play list. This map takes forever to play. each turn can last 20 minutes or more. It will be many rounds before anyone can say who is leading the game. It's just not a fun map to play, bugs or no bugs. This site is about fun, and that map is not. I say get rid of it. Cast your vote, and tell all what you think.
Marmite is a type of "thingy-type-crap-sauce" that weird english people put on toast/crackers. It's kinda related to yeast... as in isn't it a fungus?KoolBak wrote:What the hell is "marmite"? Does it come in a gallstone sauce?
you have to spread it thinly on toast, as its taste is very intense. I've not had any for ages.Marmite is a British savoury spread made from yeast extract, a by-product of beer brewing. It is a sticky, dark brown paste with a distinctive, powerful taste that polarises consumer opinion. This is reflected in the company's marketing slogan: you either "love it or hate it". It is similar to the Australasian Vegemite and Swiss Cenovis, and is suitable for vegetarians and vegans. There is also an Australasian version of "Marmite", although this uses a different recipe, is not sticky, and has a much stronger flavour that is not sweet.
I like the map because it is so big. You get alot of men each turn, which in turn causes you to think more about where to stick all these men. I like how there are sub-continents and a bonus for holding continents. I like how there are many territories so its like there are many side games going on at once in different parts of the world. There is more strategy because there is more to do and to think about. Its my favorite map because of these reasons and i'm in about 15 games at this map already and they are some of the most enjoyable games i've been in.Jamie wrote:How could a map, that's been in use less than a week, be your favorite, and why?
There is nothing worthless about the map. I am in 6 games using it - singles, doubles and triples and I have yet to encounter a problem. Is it daunting? Yes, but it isn't for everyone. There's a reason why the Indochina map was created ... it is just one step up from Lincoln Logs, Tiddlywinks and Hi-Ho Cherry-O.Kayla wrote:ok, yes i wote that, what did u write
I figure by the time it gets there, the XML will be fixed and people are still prone to make mistakes for whatever reason. I know there are a few issues, I haven't encountered them, but I don't see it as a valid, sane reason to flush the entire map. I think it is excellent work.Jamie wrote:You have all those maps of world 2.0 going, hmmmmm. Won't you be surprised then, when you find out that none of them can ever end, because some countries can't attack others, when they should be able to. Japan to taiwan for instance. Perhaps when the bugs are eliminated it might be better. Still, I don't see how a game played on this map will last less than a month at least.