Moderator: Community Team
Juan_Bottom wrote:I remember reading a while back that Blacks were natural runners, with plenty of "white meat" in their bodies.
"White muscle," Juan. "White muscle." Current nomenclature favors "Fast-twitch" or "type-II" fibers.Juan_Bottom wrote:No one talks about it, ever... but I fugure that a guy named Juan could.
Since Evolution is legit; Certainly with the complexness of the human body, each race is different in more ways than just looks?
Like as in the negative way that blacks are more likely to have sickle-cell anemia?
And the way that Ethiopians/Jamacans/Kenyans can all run like a mother...
I remember reading a while back that Blacks were natural runners, with plenty of "white meat" in their bodies. And Whites were better swimmers, because of their feet.
Not to leave out Asians, Hispanics, or Indiginous peoples.
This isn't intended to be a thread about social, or cultural differences, FYI.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
We can rebuild him. We have the technology.Neoteny wrote:"White muscle," Juan. "White muscle." Current nomenclature favors "Fast-twitch" or "type-II" fibers.Juan_Bottom wrote:No one talks about it, ever... but I fugure that a guy named Juan could.
Since Evolution is legit; Certainly with the complexness of the human body, each race is different in more ways than just looks?
Like as in the negative way that blacks are more likely to have sickle-cell anemia?
And the way that Ethiopians/Jamacans/Kenyans can all run like a mother...
I remember reading a while back that Blacks were natural runners, with plenty of "white meat" in their bodies. And Whites were better swimmers, because of their feet.
Not to leave out Asians, Hispanics, or Indiginous peoples.
This isn't intended to be a thread about social, or cultural differences, FYI.
Anyhow, despite the negative connotations associated with such a statement, I have no doubt that there are evolutionary differences between races. However, they are likely not as drastic as some sources would lead you to believe, and will likely lessen over time, rather than increase. Maybe even you, one day, Juan, could "run like a mother."
Would seem to be hard to test these differences in a way that would amount to anything thats worth saying, though its quite possible such differences between peoples could exist. Hard to start much of a thread claiming to remove social or cultural distinctions when it pretty much coates any findings you could make in such studies.Neoteny wrote:"White muscle," Juan. "White muscle." Current nomenclature favors "Fast-twitch" or "type-II" fibers.Juan_Bottom wrote:No one talks about it, ever... but I fugure that a guy named Juan could.
Since Evolution is legit; Certainly with the complexness of the human body, each race is different in more ways than just looks?
Like as in the negative way that blacks are more likely to have sickle-cell anemia?
And the way that Ethiopians/Jamacans/Kenyans can all run like a mother...
I remember reading a while back that Blacks were natural runners, with plenty of "white meat" in their bodies. And Whites were better swimmers, because of their feet.
Not to leave out Asians, Hispanics, or Indiginous peoples.
This isn't intended to be a thread about social, or cultural differences, FYI.
Anyhow, despite the negative connotations associated with such a statement, I have no doubt that there are evolutionary differences between races. However, they are likely not as drastic as some sources would lead you to believe, and will likely lessen over time, rather than increase. Maybe even you, one day, Juan, could "run like a mother."
Transhumanism threads never go the way you expect. Be careful...Frigidus wrote:We can rebuild him. We have the technology.
It's true. I imagine the differences are so minor that studying them wouldn't offer much of a point beyond the general medical advances for sickle cell and things like that. I find that most racial "differences" seem more likely to spawn from social factors (for once) than biological. So I'll blame it all on you.got tonkaed wrote:Would seem to be hard to test these differences in a way that would amount to anything thats worth saying, though its quite possible such differences between peoples could exist. Hard to start much of a thread claiming to remove social or cultural distinctions when it pretty much coates any findings you could make in such studies.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
well then clearly all the work i put in using Juan as my multi has finally paid off. Only took a made up trip to korea, a few bazillion hours looking up rediculous conspiracy threads and making a fool of myself to do.Neoteny wrote:It's true. I imagine the differences are so minor that studying them wouldn't offer much of a point beyond the general medical advances for sickle cell and things like that. I find that most racial "differences" seem more likely to spawn from social factors (for once) than biological. So I'll blame it all on you.got tonkaed wrote:Would seem to be hard to test these differences in a way that would amount to anything thats worth saying, though its quite possible such differences between peoples could exist. Hard to start much of a thread claiming to remove social or cultural distinctions when it pretty much coates any findings you could make in such studies.
An elegant trap for the most dangerous game. You're still not as bad-ass as us. Too many surveys.got tonkaed wrote:well then clearly all the work i put in using Juan as my multi has finally paid off. Only took a made up trip to korea, a few bazillion hours looking up rediculous conspiracy threads and making a fool of myself to do.Neoteny wrote:It's true. I imagine the differences are so minor that studying them wouldn't offer much of a point beyond the general medical advances for sickle cell and things like that. I find that most racial "differences" seem more likely to spawn from social factors (for once) than biological. So I'll blame it all on you.got tonkaed wrote:Would seem to be hard to test these differences in a way that would amount to anything thats worth saying, though its quite possible such differences between peoples could exist. Hard to start much of a thread claiming to remove social or cultural distinctions when it pretty much coates any findings you could make in such studies.
Soft sciences > hard sciences
We are the winnar.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
artificial intelligence is certainly good enough now to provide him with far superior reasoning capacity.Frigidus wrote:We can rebuild him. We have the technology.Neoteny wrote:"White muscle," Juan. "White muscle." Current nomenclature favors "Fast-twitch" or "type-II" fibers.Juan_Bottom wrote:No one talks about it, ever... but I fugure that a guy named Juan could.
Since Evolution is legit; Certainly with the complexness of the human body, each race is different in more ways than just looks?
Like as in the negative way that blacks are more likely to have sickle-cell anemia?
And the way that Ethiopians/Jamacans/Kenyans can all run like a mother...
I remember reading a while back that Blacks were natural runners, with plenty of "white meat" in their bodies. And Whites were better swimmers, because of their feet.
Not to leave out Asians, Hispanics, or Indiginous peoples.
This isn't intended to be a thread about social, or cultural differences, FYI.
Anyhow, despite the negative connotations associated with such a statement, I have no doubt that there are evolutionary differences between races. However, they are likely not as drastic as some sources would lead you to believe, and will likely lessen over time, rather than increase. Maybe even you, one day, Juan, could "run like a mother."
Juan_Bottom wrote: Since Evolution is legit
JESUS SAVES!!!PLAYER57832 wrote:Too many of those who claim they don't believe global warming are really "end-timer" Christians.

jay in a topic which has evolution in its name? Didn't expect that!jay_a2j wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote: Since Evolution is legit
Not quite but whatever.
Juan_Bottom wrote:I am not specifically talking about little differences... I'm taking about race related abilities... or lack thereof. Or anything medical....
Now blacks in America are 50% more likely to suffer from heart attack or stroke than a white. Is this genetic though? No! It's poverty related. But is it genetic that the NBA's greatest players are all black? Is that good genetics?
There probably are some larger differences between the races that we just don't realize. Otherwise our government would have abandoned race-specific viruses a long time ago....
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
if evolution is not true.. then why did God create something so bloody fallible?jay_a2j wrote:Juan_Bottom wrote: Since Evolution is legit
Not quite but whatever.
pimpdave wrote:Okay, that last line has just enough crazy injected into it to make me think twice about posting, but also knowing that it's a joke about conspiracy theories, I'll still try to approach this seriously.
Well, it's your DNA/Genetics that make us who we are... so mostly that.mpjh wrote:Juan, how are you defining race, by DNA haplogroup? Should the mitochondrial dominate the Y-test? What about the people like Tiger Woods that are a wild mixture? In fact, maybe Tiger is an example that a mixture is superior to all in physical attributes, beautiful, smart, and rich.
I'm speaking of natural ability through Genetics. In the way that Phelps is a great swimmer in part because of genetics.bedub1 wrote:I heard that blacks are great at basketball cause they play in the city from childhood....they are bad at hockey because they never play it.....so it's not a difference in "ability" but a difference in training and experience.
If this is true, it would lend creedance to the idea that Blacks would be better at endurance sports.bedub1 wrote:I also heard that the "whites" that are "north" had to suffer the cold...and had to thus settle down, build houses, learn to farm etc....where as if you live in someplace warmer, you don't have to worry about stuff like that.....so the elements didn't push the people to settle down and build houses...they continued to roam around and follow the animals/herds etc. I don't know if any of this is true...just shit I heard. Somebody please find real science references and correct my ignorance.
Neoteny wrote:Transhumanism threads never go the way you expect. Be careful...
Ok... who are you and what are you talking about? 9-11 was the only conspiracy threade I ever took part in...got tonkaed wrote:well then clearly all the work i put in using Juan as my multi has finally paid off. Only took a made up trip to korea, a few bazillion hours looking up rediculous conspiracy threads and making a fool of myself to do.
Soft sciences > hard sciences
We are the winnar.
Stop following me around, noob. Your reasoning is lacking in that you would come to a site and follow around someone who's already established themself. Don't make me Pinja strike you in the back of the head.black elk speaks wrote:artificial intelligence is certainly good enough now to provide him with far superior reasoning capacity.
Then this thread isn't for you.jay_a2j wrote:Not quite but whatever.
sure, i should simply leave because you don't like the fact that i think you're a moron.Juan_Bottom wrote:Stop following me around, noob. Your reasoning is lacking in that you would come to a site and follow around someone who's already established themself. Don't make me Pinja strike you in the back of the head.black elk speaks wrote:artificial intelligence is certainly good enough now to provide him with far superior reasoning capacity.
look, i can't help my self. you say stupid and half cocked things and i just have to correct. you read one article (1) and base your opinion on it, without even the possibility of conceding a single point. you never allow your self the chance to learn from your opponents, which is prolly why you will never achieve a rank much higher than corporal 1st.black elk speaks wrote:yeah, i can't say the same about you. you are never not annoying and stupid.Juan_Bottom wrote:I can't believe I missed this thread. Honestly, Black Elk Speaks is like, my new favorite poster. Is he never not funny?
do you even understand how senseless that statement is? your point has no relation to your accusation. what does my reasoning skill have at all to do with my seeking you out (which is a fallacy itself) thereby impairing my ability to reason. this is what they call a non sequitur... irrelevance i tell you! all of your arguments (at least those that i have seen) are simply abusive, irrelevant or ad hominem.Juan_Bottom wrote:Your reasoning is lacking in that you would come to a site and follow around someone who's already established themself.
Juan_Bottom wrote:Well, it's your DNA/Genetics that make us who we are... so mostly that.mpjh wrote:Juan, how are you defining race, by DNA haplogroup? Should the mitochondrial dominate the Y-test? What about the people like Tiger Woods that are a wild mixture? In fact, maybe Tiger is an example that a mixture is superior to all in physical attributes, beautiful, smart, and rich.
I'm not sayin' you don't. I was saying I don't know what you mean(don't really know you either...so..-->). Where/are you calling me a conspiracist or something?got tonkaed wrote:lets be serious juan, i think i have a bit more cred on this board than you do.
Nor can you handle compliments appearantly.black elk speaks wrote:look, i can't help my self.
Direct decendants of African origin. Location non-relevant.mpjh wrote:OK, there are several significantly different haplogroups in Asia, Europe and Africa; all of which descended directly from an African origin. What haplogroup are you calling "black?"