Moderator: Community Team

You're free to use or abuse it how you see fit. Indeed 3 stars were supposed to be the average rating, but a lot of people throw a fit when they're not getting 5 stars. On the other hand you've got assholers who leave 1 star ratings for no reason. I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.Noslen wrote:I have a quick question about the rating system.
Anything that I rate or review I have the same system/mindset....only give something top marks if it is outstanding and better than the best. However, a response left to one of the ratings I left asked why not 5 stars...whilst the person beat me I didn't see anything special in his play that would be worthy of 5 stars.
So am I wrong in leaving ratings that way or should I just leave 5 stars to all those who beat me and help to cheapen the ratings system?
Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.

JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I probably filled out the most ratings on the site and filled them all out honestly. There are alot of players out there that issue 1's for no reason.
Yeah, I naively started to hand out ratings at first. It was also interesting to see if my medal would be revoked once I removed all my ratings.cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
that is interesting, you still have your lovely medal.Frop wrote:Yeah, I naively started to hand out ratings at first. It was also interesting to see if my medal would be revoked once I removed all my ratings.cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
Why is it that everyone you rate gets the same rating for all three categories then? Is it not possible for someone to have a great attitude, but be a shit player, or vice-versa.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:I probably filled out the most ratings on the site and filled them all out honestly.
You have to realize that clicking on some stars is quite a spectacular feat. I've earned it, beejatch.jiminski wrote:that is interesting, you still have your lovely medal.Frop wrote:Yeah, I naively started to hand out ratings at first. It was also interesting to see if my medal would be revoked once I removed all my ratings.cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
Yeah, especially the 1 star rating (tags: Irrational, Reckless, Clueless, Poor Strategy) you gave to Fiambrillo for Game 3069535.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings1&username=JOHNNYROCKET24
look at the 3rd rating down.
I got a poor rating and a tag for deadbeating and I never missed a turn. theres examples like this littered on my rating page.
2008-08-18 12:24:45 - JOHNNYROCKET24: blue- please review who your target is
(...)
2008-08-19 15:17:39 - JOHNNYROCKET24: blue- banned
2008-08-19 15:17:54 - JOHNNYROCKET24: you target is green and you just let green win by taking all my countries
2008-08-19 15:18:00 - JOHNNYROCKET24: its not that difficult of a game
(...)
2008-08-20 02:15:22 - JOHNNYROCKET24: so he hits me again
2008-08-20 02:15:25 - JOHNNYROCKET24: i got 1 country left
2008-08-20 02:15:29 - JOHNNYROCKET24: un fucking real
2008-08-20 12:36:51 - Fiambrillo eliminated jdbaer00 from the game
2008-08-20 12:36:51 - Fiambrillo won the game
green had a huge stack and lost them all on the last 2 rounds and if I recall dint even get a card. He had one of those games with the dice on the last 2 rounds that you just want to forget about.Frop wrote:Yeah, especially the 1 star rating (tags: Irrational, Reckless, Clueless, Poor Strategy) you gave to Fiambrillo for Game 3069535.JOHNNYROCKET24 wrote:http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings1&username=JOHNNYROCKET24
look at the 3rd rating down.
I got a poor rating and a tag for deadbeating and I never missed a turn. theres examples like this littered on my rating page.
2008-08-18 12:24:45 - JOHNNYROCKET24: blue- please review who your target is
(...)
2008-08-19 15:17:39 - JOHNNYROCKET24: blue- banned
2008-08-19 15:17:54 - JOHNNYROCKET24: you target is green and you just let green win by taking all my countries
2008-08-19 15:18:00 - JOHNNYROCKET24: its not that difficult of a game
(...)
2008-08-20 02:15:22 - JOHNNYROCKET24: so he hits me again
2008-08-20 02:15:25 - JOHNNYROCKET24: i got 1 country left
2008-08-20 02:15:29 - JOHNNYROCKET24: un fucking real
2008-08-20 12:36:51 - Fiambrillo eliminated jdbaer00 from the game
2008-08-20 12:36:51 - Fiambrillo won the game
cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C

yeah, i marked a few on the first live day... thought i would give it one shot.DAZMCFC wrote:cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
i gave 1 person a rating and that is it. no one else is getting 1. i'm not really arsed who or ho doesn't give me a rating or how high. i still notice i'm at 4.9 so i must be still getting high ones(i don't even check any more).
Mystique is rated at 4.8... super-duper.Mystique wrote: Occupation: Having my points unfairly reset to 1000. And I'm still at a higher rank than you, how sad is that? I should be at 4000 points by now, but who's counting? (That's right, do the math: 3000 + the 1000 I've gotten since my false accusation = 4000).
DAZMCFC wrote:cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
i gave 1 person a rating and that is it. no one else is getting 1. i'm not really arsed who or ho doesn't give me a rating or how high. i still notice i'm at 4.9 so i must be still getting high ones(i don't even check any more).

Gypsys Kiss wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
i gave 1 person a rating and that is it. no one else is getting 1. i'm not really arsed who or ho doesn't give me a rating or how high. i still notice i'm at 4.9 so i must be still getting high ones(i don't even check any more).
Who was it? Happy, clapper, mandy or apey? Or possibly some other female member of this esteemed site?

DAZMCFC wrote:Gypsys Kiss wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:cpurcell wrote:Though obviously not completely because you have a rating medal...Frop wrote: I've completely avoided the problem by not leaving any ratings at all.![]()
---C
i gave 1 person a rating and that is it. no one else is getting 1. i'm not really arsed who or ho doesn't give me a rating or how high. i still notice i'm at 4.9 so i must be still getting high ones(i don't even check any more).
Who was it? Happy, clapper, mandy or apey? Or possibly some other female member of this esteemed site?
it was Mandy in our fist doubles togeher when we beat Jimbob and First, but don't tell anyone. don't want to upset them even more.
:)Thanks Jim, if you'd like a rematch, I'm sure Daz'll be up for it.jiminski wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:Gypsys Kiss wrote:DAZMCFC wrote:
i gave 1 person a rating and that is it. no one else is getting 1. i'm not really arsed who or ho doesn't give me a rating or how high. i still notice i'm at 4.9 so i must be still getting high ones(i don't even check any more).
Who was it? Happy, clapper, mandy or apey? Or possibly some other female member of this esteemed site?
it was Mandy in our fist doubles togeher when we beat Jimbob and First, but don't tell anyone. don't want to upset them even more.
no worries DaZ, she played very well.
mandyb wrote:
... I always did have a little soft spot for you- now it's that bit bigger.
Funny, I foresaw that very response...I must be truly psychic.jiminski wrote:mandyb wrote:
... I always did have a little soft spot for you- now it's that bit bigger.
I am sure Daz can now say the same...
mandyb wrote:Funny, I foresaw that very response...I must be truly psychic.jiminski wrote:mandyb wrote:
... I always did have a little soft spot for you- now it's that bit bigger.
I am sure Daz can now say the same...
Either that or you guys are very predictable.
I have learned my lesson - I shall avoid all innuendos from this day forth.jiminski wrote:mandyb wrote:Funny, I foresaw that very response...I must be truly psychic.jiminski wrote:mandyb wrote:
... I always did have a little soft spot for you- now it's that bit bigger.
I am sure Daz can now say the same...
Either that or you guys are very predictable.
either that or you were courting smut, I knew it and i gave it to you .. I gave it to you hard!