Remi looks legit?Twill wrote: After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
What on earth are you talking about?
Moderator: Community Team
Remi looks legit?Twill wrote: After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
Snorri1234 wrote:Remi looks legit?Twill wrote: After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
What on earth are you talking about?
Sorry Twill, got it backwards. I thought through my drunken haze that Remi was the only one who you thought might be IPH's multi.Twill wrote:Snorri1234 wrote:Remi looks legit?Twill wrote: After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
What on earth are you talking about?![]()
Read the first post...different Remi:
http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/member ... e&u=255530
They made it free for a reason and I am content with my playstyle.hulmey wrote:Jeff Hardy wrote:its not free for everyoneBadMoonRising wrote:So much drama for a free game.
I never saw so many ungrateful fucks with so much free time on their hands.
cc needs people to buy premium
so whats your excuse?![]()
![]()
![]()
Your saying people are un- grateful, when they have paid for the advancement of this site through buying Premium Membership. You havent given nothing to the site, so trying do the same!BadMoonRising wrote:They made it free for a reason and I am content with my playstyle.hulmey wrote:Jeff Hardy wrote:its not free for everyoneBadMoonRising wrote:So much drama for a free game.
I never saw so many ungrateful fucks with so much free time on their hands.
cc needs people to buy premium
so whats your excuse?![]()
![]()
![]()
Make beleive I paid 25 dollars and make the needed word substitutions if it gives you peace of mind.
Everyone seems to have an opinion on how the site should be run yet few know, I would bet, know what it takes. Add assholes who like to make folks lives misereble simply because its funny...you get my point.
g'day mateNephilim wrote:hulmey, there's some moronic drivel leaking out of your mouth. best to shut it, okay champ?
VVVVVVV
rather strange that when i talk about cc endorsing multis they shut my thread down in 1 hour but this one it could be an interesting discussion!! You guys really need to make up your minds what you what. Or is this thread being left open to prove a pointcicero wrote:Guys
Personally I think there's an interesting discussion to be had here, but if the thread continues to deterioriate further into insults, flames and mindless off topic posts it's going to end up in Flame Wars or locked.
Please consider the Forum Guidelines before posting ... (And yes, the italics on please is to intended to indicate a pleading tone.)
Cicero
i was asked by a mod to edit my post and out of respect i did so. Maybe its about time you start showing respectBadMoonRising wrote:Try the edit key one more time Hulmey and then you can say you completly ruined my joke.
Let's sing the bullshit song!Twill wrote:LOL, alright.
"And now, the rest of the story..."
After IPH claimed these were multis, they were frozen from creating more games and posting in the forum by a mod, in case the claim was true and until a hunter could look at them. Any time a forum freeze is put on an account it hides the profile.
After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
Thanks for the tip off's IPH, you've got better skills spotting bogus accounts than most...but really, cheating and abuse reports should be put in the right place![]()
Twill
In other wordsTwill wrote:LOL, alright.
"And now, the rest of the story..."
After IPH claimed these were multis, they were frozen from creating more games and posting in the forum by a mod, in case the claim was true and until a hunter could look at them. Any time a forum freeze is put on an account it hides the profile.
After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
Thanks for the tip off's IPH, you've got better skills spotting bogus accounts than most...but really, cheating and abuse reports should be put in the right place![]()
Twill
By trying to make up some completely bullshit terminologycena-rules wrote:In other wordsTwill wrote:LOL, alright.
"And now, the rest of the story..."
After IPH claimed these were multis, they were frozen from creating more games and posting in the forum by a mod, in case the claim was true and until a hunter could look at them. Any time a forum freeze is put on an account it hides the profile.
After looking at the accounts, Remi looks like the only legit one anyway and the account has been unfrozen, all others have been left locked.
Thanks for the tip off's IPH, you've got better skills spotting bogus accounts than most...but really, cheating and abuse reports should be put in the right place![]()
Twill
we were just going to ban these people but cena made it public so we are trying to save face.
Dont thank me for saying what you really mean twill
Fruitcake wrote:If the erstwhile member, interfacer PH, did choose those accounts at random (in random, I mean because he felt the names could be used by him in a spurious way) and if they were actually multis created, not by him, but by other players, then a pertinent thought springs to mind.
The endemic multi account making is worse than one imagines. Logic of this thought stems from the likelyhood of 4 out of 5 actually being multis, out of God knows how many new entrants.
Bruceswar wrote:Fruitcake wrote:If the erstwhile member, interfacer PH, did choose those accounts at random (in random, I mean because he felt the names could be used by him in a spurious way) and if they were actually multis created, not by him, but by other players, then a pertinent thought springs to mind.
The endemic multi account making is worse than one imagines. Logic of this thought stems from the likelyhood of 4 out of 5 actually being multis, out of God knows how many new entrants.
I think you may be on to something here. Even with cheating, many of these people who cheat cannot make it far. Far as in score, rank, and knowledge. The 4/5 number is a bit high. But I think 1/10 could be more accurate. Now most of these are created by a small % of the members here.

cena-rules wrote:Ummmmm did you read the whole thing?DAZMCFC wrote:jaseleo wrote:12 hours until all 5 accounts were deleted
wow thats some going it takes them 5 days to respond in the cheating and abuse forum and thats if they even look hence the reason i have stopped reporting multi's
jase, if someone is that desperate to cheat put them on ignore. no big deal. as for Inter's muti's, tht's a different thing all together.that's not for gaining points, think he's just trying to prove a point. good or bad that's up to the individual reading it. me i'm sitting on the fence, some of it's bollocks and some harmless.
He DIDNT create those multis

I think the idea was to show that the admin could be fooled easily, and subsequently could react if they so wished, something that is a real issue here with genuine players. It mattered not, to him, whether 1,2 or all the accounts ultimately tuned out to be multis. If none had been multis, he would have shown admin as giving a knee jerk reaction as and when he dictated, if all had been multis (as they nearly all were) he would have been no worse off. He manipulated the situation, Admin allowed themselves to be manipulated, and all that twill could really respond with was a written "ha ha, so you think you're clever, well you really helped us"...hmmmm....not sure that is really showing a great deal of iron will....however, I notice the blog has dissapeared, and that impresses me more than cheap words.hwhrhett wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Fruitcake wrote:If the erstwhile member, interfacer PH, did choose those accounts at random (in random, I mean because he felt the names could be used by him in a spurious way) and if they were actually multis created, not by him, but by other players, then a pertinent thought springs to mind.
The endemic multi account making is worse than one imagines. Logic of this thought stems from the likelyhood of 4 out of 5 actually being multis, out of God knows how many new entrants.
I think you may be on to something here. Even with cheating, many of these people who cheat cannot make it far. Far as in score, rank, and knowledge. The 4/5 number is a bit high. But I think 1/10 could be more accurate. Now most of these are created by a small % of the members here.
yeah, but if you were interfacer and you wanted to make cc look like fools, then wouldnt you choose members that actually look like they are real multis. if he picked people that obviously weren't multis then he wouldnt have been able to guaruntee that theyd be banned, and then he would run the risk of looking like a fool himself.
hulmey wrote:Actually he wanted them NOT to be multi's , so that CC would lose out on potential premiums!!!

sorry dazDAZMCFC wrote:cena-rules wrote:Ummmmm did you read the whole thing?DAZMCFC wrote:jaseleo wrote:12 hours until all 5 accounts were deleted
wow thats some going it takes them 5 days to respond in the cheating and abuse forum and thats if they even look hence the reason i have stopped reporting multi's
jase, if someone is that desperate to cheat put them on ignore. no big deal. as for Inter's muti's, tht's a different thing all together.that's not for gaining points, think he's just trying to prove a point. good or bad that's up to the individual reading it. me i'm sitting on the fence, some of it's bollocks and some harmless.
He DIDNT create those multis
cena is that reply to me?
i did read it all i was replying to jaseleo. he said he'd given up on reporting multi's.nothing to do with inters escapade.
You are taking a far too simplistic view of things, and, with respect, are not thinking the whole agenda through.hulmey wrote:Actually he wanted them NOT to be multi's , so that CC would lose out on potential premiums!!!