palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

\\OFF-TOPIC// conversations about everything that has nothing to do with Conquer Club.

Moderator: Community Team

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.
Post Reply
User avatar
Nephilim
Posts: 1272
Joined: Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:16 pm
Location: ole kantuck

palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Nephilim »

Liberté, egalité, cash moné

Hey, Fox News: Pedicabo ego vos et irrumabo

My heart beats with unconditional love
But beware of the blackness that it's capable of
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Frigidus »

Haha, no surprise. If half the members of our government were small spenders we wouldn't be nearly $10,000,000,000,000 in debt.
User avatar
Nobunaga
Posts: 1058
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 10:09 am
Location: West of Osaka

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Nobunaga »

... Funny what Slate let slide by unmentioned... Alaska has the highest Native American population, as a percentage (near 20%) of all states. New Mexico, coming in second, has less than half that. Like anyplace else, the local Native American population receives massive quantities of cash from the Feds.

... That said, I admit I know next to nothing about Alaska, so there may very well be a plethora of other reasons.

...
User avatar
Jenos Ridan
Posts: 1310
Joined: Mon Apr 16, 2007 11:34 am
Location: Hanger 18

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Jenos Ridan »

Nobunaga wrote:... Funny what Slate let slide by unmentioned... Alaska has the highest Native American population, as a percentage (near 20%) of all states. New Mexico, coming in second, has less than half that. Like anyplace else, the local Native American population receives massive quantities of cash from the Feds.

... That said, I admit I know next to nothing about Alaska, so there may very well be a plethora of other reasons.

...
The citizens of Alaska get tax refunds because of the oil. BIG tax refunds.
"There is only one road to peace, and that is to conquer"-Hunter Clark

"Give a man a fire and he will be warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life"- Something Hunter would say
User avatar
Snorri1234
Posts: 3438
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2007 11:52 am
Location: Right in the middle of a fucking reptile zoo.
Contact:

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Snorri1234 »

Jenos Ridan wrote:
Nobunaga wrote:... Funny what Slate let slide by unmentioned... Alaska has the highest Native American population, as a percentage (near 20%) of all states. New Mexico, coming in second, has less than half that. Like anyplace else, the local Native American population receives massive quantities of cash from the Feds.

... That said, I admit I know next to nothing about Alaska, so there may very well be a plethora of other reasons.

...
The citizens of Alaska get tax refunds because of the oil. BIG tax refunds.
I admit that that is a pretty cool thing Palin has done.
"Some motherfuckers are always trying to ice skate uphill."

Duane: You know what they say about love and war.
Tim: Yes, one involves a lot of physical and psychological pain, and the other one's war.
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Mr_Adams »

Frigidus wrote:Haha, no surprise. If half the members of our government were small spenders we wouldn't be nearly $10,000,000,000,000 in debt.
you need to multiply that number by .00004 to find our ACTUAL debt. but still, the debt is ridiculious.
Image
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Frigidus »

Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:Haha, no surprise. If half the members of our government were small spenders we wouldn't be nearly $10,000,000,000,000 in debt.
you need to multiply that number by .00004 to find our ACTUAL debt. but still, the debt is ridiculious.
Hm...you sure? If we're only $400,000,000 in the hole, then I don't know what all the fuss is about.
PLAYER57832
Posts: 3085
Joined: Fri Sep 21, 2007 9:17 am
Gender: Female
Location: Pennsylvania

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by PLAYER57832 »

Have you seen the recent ads claiming that if Obama is elected middle class taxes will go up?

When in reality, unless you are rich, it is Mcain who will cause our taxes to go up?
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Mr_Adams »

oops... I meant to only put 3 zero's afterthe decimal. that would be 4 billion.
Image
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Mr_Adams »

I'm sorry, it appears I' was misinformed. It appears that the actual debt is more like 400,000,000,000. I feal like a fool now... :oops: but still, less the half a trillion. And for all you CCer's in america who want to help stop this, there is an orginization that goes by CAGW(Citizens against government waste) That will send you a monthly e-mail about the wastful projects each state's reps are supporting, and they incourage you to write your reps. good group.
Image
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Mr_Adams »

Frigidus wrote:
Mr_Adams wrote:
Frigidus wrote:Haha, no surprise. If half the members of our government were small spenders we wouldn't be nearly $10,000,000,000,000 in debt.
you need to multiply that number by .00004 to find our ACTUAL debt. but still, the debt is ridiculious.
Hm...you sure? If we're only $400,000,000 in the hole, then I don't know what all the fuss is about.
Mr_Adams wrote:I'm sorry, it appears I' was misinformed. It appears that the actual debt is more like 400,000,000,000. I feal like a fool now... :oops: but still, less the half a trillion. And for all you CCer's in america who want to help stop this, there is an orginization that goes by CAGW(Citizens against government waste) That will send you a monthly e-mail about the wastful projects each state's reps are supporting, and they incourage you to write your reps. good group.
I knew it started with a 4! :lol:
Image
Nikolai
Posts: 423
Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:11 pm

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Nikolai »

Uhm... that sounds more like the deficit. National debt is something like $8 trillion, last I checked... was pretty close to 9, though. Not ten yet, but getting there...
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Frigidus »

Guess it's up to $9,671,000,000,000 and change at this point.
User avatar
Mr_Adams
Posts: 1987
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 8:33 pm
Gender: Male

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Mr_Adams »

Nikolai wrote:Uhm... that sounds more like the deficit. National debt is something like $8 trillion, last I checked... was pretty close to 9, though. Not ten yet, but getting there...
defecit... maybe that's what I was refering to. maybe I should leave this thread alone now... :?
Image
User avatar
Frigidus
Posts: 1638
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 1:15 pm
Location: Illinois, USA

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by Frigidus »

Mr_Adams wrote:
Nikolai wrote:Uhm... that sounds more like the deficit. National debt is something like $8 trillion, last I checked... was pretty close to 9, though. Not ten yet, but getting there...
defecit... maybe that's what I was refering to. maybe I should leave this thread alone now... :?
Nah, the trade defecit is about right on there, equally concerning.
User avatar
savant
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2008 2:26 pm

Re: palin and the GOP: the small-government party?

Post by savant »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6urw_PWHYk

Matt Damon on Sarah Palin (not literally)
"Some men aren't looking for anything logical.
They can't be bought... Bullied... Reasoned or negotiated with.
Some men just want to watch the world burn."
Post Reply

Return to “Acceptable Content”