Moderator: Community Team
Yeah, but I actually think he knew that. Obama is not stupid and probably realised how the republicans would act on it but figured he could make a point about it.Nobunaga wrote:... Was Obama referencing Pailin with the pig comment? Maybe yes, probably no. But he damned well should have known better, and known how it would be taken.
Yeah, but f*ck the crowd. I don't judge politicians on who is voting for them.The crowd took it the way the Republicans took i as well, (but they were Dems, so it was cheering and laughter).
Only if he didn't intend to make a point about it. I'm not sure it was the best idea, but I know he wouldn't try it without realising the consequences. This is the man who out-witted all the other democrats, something which is far harder to do than beating all the other republicans. Not that democratic voters aren't stupid, but they're often higher educated so you have to spin your bullshit more elaborately to win.... Fire that writer. But still, his using the phrase shows a lack of judgement, ill-intended or no.
by 'them' i meant 'all of us'.Anarkistsdream wrote:heavycola wrote:
Please. China. Hurry up and nuke them already.
hey, buddy, f- you... It's not my fault that 200 years of history taught this government nothing.

Bingo. Thread answered.gdeangel wrote:If you still don't believe me, call McCain a porch monkey in a crows of white guys... then go call Obama a porch monkey in a crowd of African Americans.

... Which one was Romney?Snorri1234 wrote:... Sealing the republican vote was far easier, as McCain had to deal with a guy who kept saying 9/11, a guy who was a fucking mormon (since religions matters in the US it's not that hard to win there) and a sort of crazy pastor.
Ah, but see, unlike most issues (abortion is a good example) those against gay marriage have no good arguments other than "Bible says". That doesn't (nah, it does, shouldn't) fly in the political arena. Gay marriage is the rare type of issue that I can definitively say I am right on.nesterdude wrote:Why because people have a differing perspective on an issue than you?Frigidus wrote:
(ugh, over half of America is against it, we disgust me).
That's not very open minded when talking about issues where your base says you ought to have an open mind to allow.
You are only one part of a nation of beliefs, don't think yours matters more than 51%
... Untrue. My argument has nothing to do with the Bible. Gay marriage grants certain tax advantages to couples which in turn increases tax burdens on others.Frigidus wrote:Ah, but see, unlike most issues (abortion is a good example) those against gay marriage have no good arguments other than "Bible says". That doesn't (nah, it does, shouldn't) fly in the political arena. Gay marriage is the rare type of issue that I can definitively say I am right on.nesterdude wrote:Why because people have a differing perspective on an issue than you?Frigidus wrote:
(ugh, over half of America is against it, we disgust me).
That's not very open minded when talking about issues where your base says you ought to have an open mind to allow.
You are only one part of a nation of beliefs, don't think yours matters more than 51%
OK then, get rid of marriage tax incentives altogether. What's true for gay couples is true for straight ones. What you can't do is say "you can marry but you can't, it's a slight burden to the taxpayer".Nobunaga wrote:... Untrue. My argument has nothing to do with the Bible. Gay marriage grants certain tax advantages to couples which in turn increases tax burdens on others.Frigidus wrote:Ah, but see, unlike most issues (abortion is a good example) those against gay marriage have no good arguments other than "Bible says". That doesn't (nah, it does, shouldn't) fly in the political arena. Gay marriage is the rare type of issue that I can definitively say I am right on.nesterdude wrote:Why because people have a differing perspective on an issue than you?Frigidus wrote:
(ugh, over half of America is against it, we disgust me).
That's not very open minded when talking about issues where your base says you ought to have an open mind to allow.
You are only one part of a nation of beliefs, don't think yours matters more than 51%
... You believe that? No? OK. I tried.
...
Or you could call McCain a skin head in a crowd of ex-marines, and go call Obama a skin head in a group of municipal workers.heavycola wrote:Bingo. Thread answered.gdeangel wrote:If you still don't believe me, call McCain a porch monkey in a crows of white guys... then go call Obama a porch monkey in a crowd of African Americans.
Facts? Heh heh - what's your favorite flavor of Kool-Aid? If you're stoopid enough to believe McCain is free from the powers that be, you're too stoopid to spot the obviously rhetorical question (and the rhetorical answer is of course grape). Let me guess - you also think George Jr. is a great leader - har - nailed that one didn't i?gdeangel wrote:Or you could call McCain a skin head in a crowd of ex-marines, and go call Obama a skin head in a group of municipal workers.heavycola wrote:Bingo. Thread answered.gdeangel wrote:If you still don't believe me, call McCain a porch monkey in a crows of white guys... then go call Obama a porch monkey in a crowd of African Americans.
And clearly you are not looking at the facts about McCain's records or Sara Palin's. McCain has been kicked around so badly by his party in the past, I don't think you can say he's beholden to the powers that be. Those powers that be didn't even pony up enough money for him to have a campaign office in Iowa I believe.
heavycola wrote:what do these people actually give a f*ck about?

You exaggerate. They are not that shallow. There are plenty of other reality shows they care about too. I'd name some if I could tell 'em apart.luns101 wrote:heavycola wrote:what do these people actually give a f*ck about?
I think they're coming out with a political reality show soon...jonesthecurl wrote:You exaggerate. They are not that shallow. There are plenty of other reality shows they care about too. I'd name some if I could tell 'em apart.luns101 wrote:heavycola wrote:what do these people actually give a f*ck about?
Skoffin wrote: So um.. er... I'll be honest, I don't know what the f*ck to do from here. Goddamnit chu.
I heard they were making a comeback and got paired together for Dancing with the Starsjonesthecurl wrote:It's been going on for some while.
Ron Paul and Mrs Clinton are among those who've been voted off...
HC, you seem to have no problem tells us Americans what to do, but if anyone thinks to question how your nation works you practically fly off the handle.heavycola wrote:by 'them' i meant 'all of us'.Anarkistsdream wrote:heavycola wrote:
Please. China. Hurry up and nuke them already.
hey, buddy, f- you... It's not my fault that 200 years of history taught this government nothing.
i shoudl also confess that i fucking love obama and that if the US doesn't seize this opportunity with both dimpled fists then... well, you deserve to slip to third in the 2012 medals table. All i'm saying.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Speaking of hypocrites . . . Hello Pot.Jenos Ridan wrote:HC, you seem to have no problem tells us Americans what to do, but if anyone thinks to question how your nation works you practically fly off the handle.heavycola wrote:by 'them' i meant 'all of us'.Anarkistsdream wrote:heavycola wrote:
Please. China. Hurry up and nuke them already.
hey, buddy, f- you... It's not my fault that 200 years of history taught this government nothing.
i shoudl also confess that i fucking love obama and that if the US doesn't seize this opportunity with both dimpled fists then... well, you deserve to slip to third in the 2012 medals table. All i'm saying.
Upon conculting the dictionary, I found the word I was searching for; hypocrite. As in you are a hypocritical, pompass limey twit.
Have a nice day.
Versailles Treaty. It was a real sore point for any German, especially radicals like Hitler. One of the restrictions, the 100,000 man standing army (not counting state police and local militias), forced them to develop the use of mechanized infantry that, when coupled with tanks and aircover, formed the basis of blitzkrieg. It all kind of avalanched from there.pimpdave wrote:The problem with American politics is that we bailed out England from the big Dubya Dubya Aye Aye.
Also, it's all France's fault somehow. Generally, everything is France's is fault, but this time it's really true.
In what way am I a hypocrite? Or are you just trolling?b.k. barunt wrote:Speaking of hypocrites . . . Hello Pot.Jenos Ridan wrote:HC, you seem to have no problem tells us Americans what to do, but if anyone thinks to question how your nation works you practically fly off the handle.heavycola wrote:by 'them' i meant 'all of us'.Anarkistsdream wrote:heavycola wrote:
Please. China. Hurry up and nuke them already.
hey, buddy, f- you... It's not my fault that 200 years of history taught this government nothing.
i shoudl also confess that i fucking love obama and that if the US doesn't seize this opportunity with both dimpled fists then... well, you deserve to slip to third in the 2012 medals table. All i'm saying.
Upon conculting the dictionary, I found the word I was searching for; hypocrite. As in you are a hypocritical, pompass limey twit.
Have a nice day.
Honibaz