Moderator: Community Team

Oh, please don't...owenshooter wrote:i should bring that out of retirement, just for the giggles!!!-0MeDeFe wrote:I'm all for it! Can we submerge the crucifix in a jar of urine and take a picture of it so it looks ethereal?Robinette wrote:How about a "Black Face" Brian Peppers on a crucifix?
p.s.-nice nipple!!


some find spamming up the GD with turtle avatars offensive... ahem...-0hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.

QFT -Yeah !owenshooter wrote:some find spamming up the GD with turtle avatars offensive... ahem...-0hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.
Ok i could be missing something here.. i dont recognize the picture.. but even if it is a sex offender then still maybe hes happy that this person is caught, or showing to people that if you commit those crimes then you'll be found and convicted one day.. a picture can say a 1000 words.. but what words does the person mean to say when they put it up is a different question. In any answer, if he means it to be praising the actions of this individual then thats his opinion- messed up it may be.. CC has no rules restricting anything said or done in avatars.hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.
yes they do... it is a great unwritten... if someone complains about your avatar or an avatar, somehow they determineDiamonds14 wrote:CC has no rules restricting anything said or done in avatars.

When did that start making sense? You never see somebody brandishing a sports team logo because your happy that they lost (unless it's done in an offensive manner, such as with drawings on it, or in the case of one bar I went to, they had the jersey of the other hockey team on the floor for people to walk on) or waving a Swastika flag because they're happy that the nazi's lost the war. 1ump is a troll. This new avatar of his is him trolling. Also, CC does have rules on avatars. Read the forum guidelines, they apply to avatars too.Diamonds14 wrote:Ok i could be missing something here.. i dont recognize the picture.. but even if it is a sex offender then still maybe hes happy that this person is caught, or showing to people that if you commit those crimes then you'll be found and convicted one day.. a picture can say a 1000 words.. but what words does the person mean to say when they put it up is a different question. In any answer, if he means it to be praising the actions of this individual then thats his opinion- messed up it may be.. CC has no rules restricting anything said or done in avatars.hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.
Everybody having the same, or similar, avatars is a great way to show support for something. Whether it be for a clan or just showing support for the site owner during a time when the site was being attacked by trolls and multi's, as was the case of the turtle avatars.KoE_Sirius wrote:QFT -Yeah !owenshooter wrote:some find spamming up the GD with turtle avatars offensive... ahem...-0hecter wrote:He's trying to raise awareness of a disease by having a picture of a convicted sex offender as his avatar? Sorry, but anyway I look at it, convicted sex offenders are offensive. Period.


hecter, you can't see the forest for the trees... wump is not trolling with his avatar, and your turtles were/arehecter wrote:blah, blah, blah...


A lot of people found Piss Christ quite offensive, but only after they had found out how the effect of that otherworldly light surrounding the crucifix had been achieved.hecter wrote:That makes absolutely no sense. I wear a turtle avatar to show support for the site. It's no different than somebody wearing a clan avatar to show support for their clan. wump is wearing an avatar of a known convicted sex offender. My morals tells me that raping somebody is wrong and offensive. Sorry that you feel differently.
And when did I ever find one of your avatars offensive?
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
See, while I can understand how people could find a urine soaked Jesus offensive, we're talking about how I found it offensive. As owen said,MeDeFe wrote:A lot of people found Piss Christ quite offensive, but only after they had found out how the effect of that otherworldly light surrounding the crucifix had been achieved.hecter wrote:That makes absolutely no sense. I wear a turtle avatar to show support for the site. It's no different than somebody wearing a clan avatar to show support for their clan. wump is wearing an avatar of a known convicted sex offender. My morals tells me that raping somebody is wrong and offensive. Sorry that you feel differently.
And when did I ever find one of your avatars offensive?
Which I didn't.owenshooter wrote:you found my old avatar offensive, a month after

You're fucking hilarious. And cool.Nephilim wrote:for the first time ever, firth has made an actual contribution to civilized debate. apparently the dude pictured in the avy in question is an internet sensation for more than just his physical appearance. thus, loser geeks like firth and wump know exactly who he is, and apparently whump wants us to know that he knows.....back away from the edge, tom, whump is a moron and you can sleep peacefully, mmmm k?
Right, posting on internet-forums is for no-life bums but polishing your skill in a simple online game isn't.hiddendragon wrote:nagerous wrote:Bah, they're no-life bums...hiddendragon wrote:Hey snorri and anarkist are cool guys, who contribute effectively to the website... please don't classify them in the same group.t-o-m wrote:It sadens me to think that someone would make humour out of it.
What are your views on it?
wrestler1ump
mod edit
He seems to find the most offensive Avatars he can find...If he had half the skills at the game that he does to offend he might have a decent rank...He's just another skilless forum debutante, much like snori and anarkist
I just saw it.owenshooter wrote: p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....
Wooo!!! Hitler avatars for all!Diamonds14 wrote: if it is a sex offender then still maybe hes happy that this person is caught, or showing to people that if you commit those crimes then you'll be found and convicted one day.. a picture can say a 1000 words.. but what words does the person mean to say when they put it up is a different question.
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

1) He's a sex offender who raped underage girls.t-o-m wrote:It sadens me to think that someone would make humour out of it.
What are your views on it?
wrestler1ump
i am following tom around the forums for the joy of laughing at his clan sig...almost as good as blitz's whacked reflection in his thota sig!!-0Snorri1234 wrote:I just saw it.owenshooter wrote: p.s.-tom should be more worried about the hilarious mis-spelled word in his clan sig that has us all giggling at them....![]()

1) He's a sex offender who raped underage girls.


The same could be said about anyone brigadier or above on this website... then again I forget CC risk is serious business.hiddendragon wrote:nagerous wrote:Bah, they're no-life bums...hiddendragon wrote:Hey snorri and anarkist are cool guys, who contribute effectively to the website... please don't classify them in the same group.t-o-m wrote:It sadens me to think that someone would make humour out of it.
What are your views on it?
wrestler1ump
mod edit
He seems to find the most offensive Avatars he can find...If he had half the skills at the game that he does to offend he might have a decent rank...He's just another skilless forum debutante, much like snori and anarkist
