Moderator: Community Team
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Nonsense. [urlhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6949569950494158224&ei=8CPZSNWBAZKsiALZ9qHDAg&q=gerrard+marseilles+2008&vt=lf]See Steven Gerrard's first goal against Marseilles last week. [/url]Nephilim wrote:american footy is probably more exciting in the sense that anything can happen at anytime. someone can take it the distance at a moment's notice. this isn't true in soccer, at least high level soccer, that is.

In fact, the game growing fastest in popularity worldwide is basketball. For the longest time it was soccer, because so little is needed to play it. So even the poorest of every nation could play and enjoy it.heavycola wrote: You could argue that american football, as a set of memes, has done its best to spread the word. There was a european league everyone was trying to get excited about at one point, for example, only nobody did. Proper football has, OTOH, performed much better as a cultural virus. It has attracted and retained billions more acolytes, and continues to do so. Which is the better sport is a meaningless question, unelss you define a sport's 'goodness' as its ability to capture and hold people's imagination and loyalty. Seen from that perspective, proper football wins 1-0. But it's only one way to look at it.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Hell, you can gamble like a shite-faced swab-jockey on football too. I'm surprised you haven't picked up on that.darvlay wrote:What makes American Football the more enjoyable sport to follow, in my opinion, is gambling on it.
Against the advisement of others I'll keep this going. In each of the division of the two conferences, the team with the best record at the end of week 17 continues on to the playoffs. Along with them are included four "wild card" teams, the two teams with the best record in the AFC that didn't win their division and the two teams with the best record in the NFC that didn't win their division. The AFC and NFC are then seeded from 1-6, and play in a bracket like so (this is from an earlier season):Pedronicus wrote:Can anyone please explain how your leagues work?
for example, in the Premiership the bottom 3 teams each year are demoted to the next league down.
The winner of the league wins a cup
the top 2 teams are automatically put through to the Champions league (a massive revenue generating cash cow that stops Arsenal from going broke) and the teams that finished 3rd and 4th go into play off games. if they win those games - then they're in the champions league proper.
Thanks (I'll add this info to the second and third posts respectively)

That isn't true at all. In France v Scotland last year France were screwing us over for most of the game but coundn't score, so it was 0-0. We had a goal kick, punted it up the field, McFadden takes 2 touches and shoots and scores. We win 1-0. Anything can happen at anytime and sometimes does.while i love both versions of football, i would say that american footy is probably more exciting in the sense that anything can happen at anytime. someone can take it the distance at a moment's notice. this isn't true in soccer, at least high level soccer, that is.
Sure, because it's all about entertainment value. It's strange that, despite the fact that we are comparing entertainment value of these two sports, it would be exceedingly easy for me to pick out your favorite sport, and I'd hazard nearly impossible for you to pick mine. Is it because of the obvious entertainment value of footy, or because that is what you've had on the end of the cock that's been rammed down your throat since you were born?Spuzzell wrote:Oh, just shut the f*ck up you tool.Neoteny wrote: It's really not when you consider that entertainment is subjective, and any sort of investigation of which subjective form of anything is better is absurd.
This thread is about the relative entertainment value of two sports. And if you can't see how viewing figures relate to that, then you're a moron. And fat.
So cock off, cuntface.
Here's a link to buy lots of mild American cheese from, run along please, do. http://www.hilmarcheese.com/
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
Naked Midget Drag Queen Mud Wrestling On Fire.Neoteny wrote: I'd hazard nearly impossible for you to pick mine.
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
f*ck. You cheated.pimpdave wrote:Naked Midget Drag Queen Mud Wrestling On Fire.Neoteny wrote: I'd hazard nearly impossible for you to pick mine.
Case closed.
Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
lol mate, it's unlike you to use such shabby reasoning. one example of a breakdown in defense and a quick goal does not make a very convincing case for you......it is VERY difficult for one person to break down a high level defense in soccer, and still pretty difficult for a whole combination of players to do so......this is incontrovertibly proven simply by the low scores of games, and undeniable except by the insane......heavycola wrote:Nonsense. [urlhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6949569950494158224&ei=8CPZSNWBAZKsiALZ9qHDAg&q=gerrard+marseilles+2008&vt=lf]See Steven Gerrard's first goal against Marseilles last week. [/url]Nephilim wrote:american footy is probably more exciting in the sense that anything can happen at anytime. someone can take it the distance at a moment's notice. this isn't true in soccer, at least high level soccer, that is.
You could argue that american football, as a set of memes, has done its best to spread the word. There was a european league everyone was trying to get excited about at one point, for example, only nobody did. Proper football has, OTOH, performed much better as a cultural virus. It has attracted and retained billions more acolytes, and continues to do so. Which is the better sport is a meaningless question, unelss you define a sport's 'goodness' as its ability to capture and hold people's imagination and loyalty. Seen from that perspective, proper football wins 1-0. But it's only one way to look at it.
Like you said Iliad, do 2 billion xians make it the best religion? Morally. no of course not, but as a set of successfully replicating ideas, yes.
What a wanky post. My apols.
I'm not a fan of either "football" - both games are just moving a bag of wind about - why not just kick a politician?pmchugh wrote:First off I would like to say, yes this ("stupid") argument isn't going to change the world or anyone's opinion but who gives a f*ck can we still not do it anyway? Lets face it anything you do on this forum wont change the world but your still here so if you think it's stupid then gfy.
That isn't true at all. In France v Scotland last year France were screwing us over for most of the game but coundn't score, so it was 0-0. We had a goal kick, punted it up the field, McFadden takes 2 touches and shoots and scores. We win 1-0. Anything can happen at anytime and sometimes does.while i love both versions of football, i would say that american footy is probably more exciting in the sense that anything can happen at anytime. someone can take it the distance at a moment's notice. this isn't true in soccer, at least high level soccer, that is.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nmtB7rB ... re=related
I wasn't really reasoning with the link, merely remembering a goal that gave me a proper semi.Nephilim wrote:lol mate, it's unlike you to use such shabby reasoning. one example of a breakdown in defense and a quick goal does not make a very convincing case for you......it is VERY difficult for one person to break down a high level defense in soccer, and still pretty difficult for a whole combination of players to do so......this is incontrovertibly proven simply by the low scores of games, and undeniable except by the insane......heavycola wrote:Nonsense. [urlhttp://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6949569950494158224&ei=8CPZSNWBAZKsiALZ9qHDAg&q=gerrard+marseilles+2008&vt=lf]See Steven Gerrard's first goal against Marseilles last week. [/url]Nephilim wrote:american footy is probably more exciting in the sense that anything can happen at anytime. someone can take it the distance at a moment's notice. this isn't true in soccer, at least high level soccer, that is.
You could argue that american football, as a set of memes, has done its best to spread the word. There was a european league everyone was trying to get excited about at one point, for example, only nobody did. Proper football has, OTOH, performed much better as a cultural virus. It has attracted and retained billions more acolytes, and continues to do so. Which is the better sport is a meaningless question, unelss you define a sport's 'goodness' as its ability to capture and hold people's imagination and loyalty. Seen from that perspective, proper football wins 1-0. But it's only one way to look at it.
Like you said Iliad, do 2 billion xians make it the best religion? Morally. no of course not, but as a set of successfully replicating ideas, yes.
What a wanky post. My apols.
Hang on - i didn't equate 'interestingness' with popularity, i was just trying to comapre them in a more meaningful way than 'this sucks'- 'no this sucks'that being said, i love the sport, playing and watching, as i said. i'm simply stating that it is much easier to score in american footy--many many players can take it the distance at any time.
this leads to an important point, so all you dumbasses pay attention: pedro stated the purpose of this thread in the original post, "to prove which type of football gives more surprises and ultimately is more interesting than the other." to that end, i made a comment on the "excitement" factor between the 2 games. all you idiots who keep saying there is no way to determine which is "better," f*ck off. we're talking about parity in the respective leagues and keeping interest.
and heavy, the bloke who posted right after you sort of shot a hole in your argument. as far as rating the 2 sports' interesting-ness or influence by gauging worldwide loyalty/popularity, you run into the immediate problem that the playing field is not level.....soccer is soooooo much easier for anyone in the world to pick up. we basically have to throw this whole line of argument out if discussing how interesting/culturally meaningful the 2 sports are.......

I haven't the time now to look for it, but there was a fascinating study published in the New England Journal of Medicine about that very topic not too long ago. Either this past January or in January 2007. If I can find it (when I have the time to look) I'll either post a link or I'll give you a summary of it. (I'm not sure if the Journal is published online, or if done so for free).heavycola wrote: Anyway, either we go on from there, or we try and find out whether the average level of excitement experienced by gridiron fans during a game is greater than the av level of excitment experienced by football fans during a game. Which is obviously impossible, although - and I am being an arse here - the 50 per cent of time given over to adverts during a televised american football game must have a negative effect...
jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Perhaps I'm missing out? Tell me more.tiberiusaquila wrote:Hell, you can gamble like a shite-faced swab-jockey on football too. I'm surprised you haven't picked up on that.darvlay wrote:What makes American Football the more enjoyable sport to follow, in my opinion, is gambling on it.
Maxleod wrote:Not strike, he's the only one with a functioning brain.
This will never happen in American footballNephilim wrote:nice thread, pedro. i think you'll have to give the NFL a little more time, we're only thru 3 games out of 16 in the whole season....and the actual way you intend to determine "excitment factor" or parity or whatever isn't really clear......
while i love both versions of football, i would say that american footy is probably more exciting in the sense that anything can happen at anytime. someone can take it the distance at a moment's notice. this isn't true in soccer, at least high level soccer, that is.
plus, i'd think there is much more parity in the NFL than EPL. the big 4 in EPL are always up there....but in the NFL the mix changes a ton every year.
ps: ROLL TIDE!!!!! beat them dawgs!!!!! (but i hope georgia wins every other game this year)