All i managed to take on board was that Adolf had one bollock (and i knew that before, so I'm none the wiser)Ditocoaf wrote: Wait, we're getting too nuanced too quickly. We'd better slow down and let some people catch up.
Moderator: Community Team
All i managed to take on board was that Adolf had one bollock (and i knew that before, so I'm none the wiser)Ditocoaf wrote: Wait, we're getting too nuanced too quickly. We'd better slow down and let some people catch up.
Well he only had one attached to his body. His storeroom was rather different though.Pedronicus wrote:All i managed to take on board was that Adolf had one bollock (and i knew that before, so I'm none the wiser)Ditocoaf wrote: Wait, we're getting too nuanced too quickly. We'd better slow down and let some people catch up.
We should apply spartan law: any child that is stunted or deformed is put down. Immediatelycomic boy wrote:Would this also apply to Dwarfs, because even at 21 they have not really grown up.Iliad wrote:On the topic of abortion I really think an abortion can be used as long as the child is under 21 years of age. Once he is 21 he is an adult, and deserves lifeJenos Ridan wrote:Your above comment is irrelivent, the point stands: How far can moral relativism go? At what point is something wrong? If there is no objective measure, then we are talking nihilism.Iliad wrote:GODWIN"S LAW!!!
I win!! I WIN!!!
![]()
Because...Iliad wrote:We should apply spartan law: any child that is stunted or deformed is put down. Immediatelycomic boy wrote:Would this also apply to Dwarfs, because even at 21 they have not really grown up.Iliad wrote:On the topic of abortion I really think an abortion can be used as long as the child is under 21 years of age. Once he is 21 he is an adult, and deserves lifeJenos Ridan wrote:Your above comment is irrelivent, the point stands: How far can moral relativism go? At what point is something wrong? If there is no objective measure, then we are talking nihilism.Iliad wrote:GODWIN"S LAW!!!
I win!! I WIN!!!
![]()
Yep. Hitler was evil, but that doesn't mean that every minute thing he did was evil, or that every detail about him was evil. It can get to the point that any argument can be supported by a Nazi reference.deronimo wrote:Sure, sure it wasSnorri1234 wrote:That's wrong. The law was constructed to make sure unneccesary references to hitler or the nazis are ignored.deronimo wrote:I know you're probably just having a bit of fun with Jenos, but Godwin's law was constructed in order to ignore the most obvious example of evil in the world. Many people appeal to the Third Reich as an example or warning. It's such an obvious example that others don't want to acknowledge it so they invoke this farce of Godwin's Law to get around the argument.Iliad wrote:GODWIN"S LAW!!!
I win!! I WIN!!!
![]()

THE CONQUER CLUB OFF TOPIC FORUM!!!Snorri1234 wrote:Because...Iliad wrote:We should apply spartan law: any child that is stunted or deformed is put down. Immediately
THIS
IS
Hence why I keep on after the morons who bring this farce up.deronimo wrote:I know you're probably just having a bit of fun with Jenos, but Godwin's law was constructed in order to ignore the most obvious example of evil in the world. Many people appeal to the Third Reich as an example or warning. It's such an obvious example that others don't want to acknowledge it so they invoke this farce of Godwin's Law to get around the argument.Iliad wrote:GODWIN"S LAW!!!
I win!! I WIN!!!
![]()
OK, let me rephrase Godwin's Law (as it has come to be used). If you allege that the opposition in a debate is like Hitler/the Nazis you have fallen back on something so cliched, so persistently incorrect, so uncreative, that you are deemed to have lost the debate because of poor argument. While the poor argument bit is usually true, the rule is more of a meme than a set law, referred to in jest. I believe theJenos Ridan wrote:Hence why I keep on after the morons who bring this farce up.deronimo wrote:I know you're probably just having a bit of fun with Jenos, but Godwin's law was constructed in order to ignore the most obvious example of evil in the world. Many people appeal to the Third Reich as an example or warning. It's such an obvious example that others don't want to acknowledge it so they invoke this farce of Godwin's Law to get around the argument.Iliad wrote:GODWIN"S LAW!!!
I win!! I WIN!!!
![]()
Dancing Mustard wrote:What are you talking about?Jenos Ridan wrote:But it is good to see Prancing Custard show his true colors when someone else uses the word play in his posts.
Need I say (well, actually, it was you who said that) more or will you own up to your error?Dancing Mustard wrote:Jenos teh Ridanz
Ok, deny that I baited the guy in another thread. Doesn't matter to me, but you seem to have taken a shot to the ol' pride.Dancing Mustard wrote:Mirror, Jenos. Jenos, Mirror.Jenos Ridan wrote:To say nothing about how he's been played like a two-dollar flute.
Oh hang on, I see you've already met.
Great job, you've just dropped a big, stinky load on thousands of years of human, sectarian AND secular, thought on the matter of ethics.Dancing Mustard wrote:They're really handy mental constructs that can be wielded by the church as an instrument of empty social control.Jenos Ridan wrote:On a side note: if ethics have no validity, what good are they?
Really, there's no such thing as ethics... which is why all your anti-abortion arguments fall down.
And your posts all have the structural integrity of a house of cards.comic boy wrote:Being attacked by Jenos is akin to being molested by a stunted Piranha who has yet to recover from a major bout of dental surgery. Mind you his use of irony is equisite ....calling other people morons
That's what she said.Jenos Ridan wrote:And your posts all have the structural integrity of a house of cards.comic boy wrote:Being attacked by Jenos is akin to being molested by a stunted Piranha who has yet to recover from a major bout of dental surgery. Mind you his use of irony is equisite ....calling other people morons
Quit dodging the main point of the argument: at what point is something wrong? How awful does something have to be before it is unacceptible. I could scour the thesaurus for hours on end to put this in many, many differnent ways but I think simplicity is the name of the game when dealling with pompass hypocrites who thing I'M the drooling retard.Frigidus wrote:OK, let me rephrase Godwin's Law (as it has come to be used). If you allege that the opposition in a debate is like Hitler/the Nazis you have fallen back on something so cliched, so persistently incorrect, so uncreative, that you are deemed to have lost the debate because of poor argument. While the poor argument bit is usually true, the rule is more of a meme than a set law, referred to in jest. I believe theJenos Ridan wrote:Hence why I keep on after the morons who bring this farce up.deronimo wrote:I know you're probably just having a bit of fun with Jenos, but Godwin's law was constructed in order to ignore the most obvious example of evil in the world. Many people appeal to the Third Reich as an example or warning. It's such an obvious example that others don't want to acknowledge it so they invoke this farce of Godwin's Law to get around the argument.Iliad wrote:GODWIN"S LAW!!!
I win!! I WIN!!!
![]()
's might have tipped you off to that.
"I'm rubber, you're glue" BLAH BLAH BLAH. You are the sort of twit that I'd have socked in the mouth just as soon as glue tumbled out. To which I'd say, "Gee, sure don't seem all that rubbery to me."comic boy wrote:Away small fish, your gummy insults cannot touch me
I'd say that the point something wrong comes somewhere beyond words personally, but you don't seem to quite agree. <Insert appropriate smiley>Jenos Ridan wrote:Quit dodging the main point of the argument: at what point is something wrong? How awful does something have to be before it is unacceptible. I could scour the thesaurus for hours on end to put this in many, many differnent ways but I think simplicity is the name of the game when dealling with pompass hypocrites who thing I'M the drooling retard.
YEAH1!!11!!1!!!! LOOK AT MY FUCKING BICEPS MAN!!!! I WOULD HAVE U TOTALLY HARDCORE BEAT TO A MOTHERRFUCKING PULP1!!!!! YEAAAAAHHHH!!!! GO TEAM!!!!Jenos Ridan wrote:"I'm rubber, you're glue" BLAH BLAH BLAH. You are the sort of twit that I'd have socked in the mouth just as soon as glue tumbled out. To which I'd say, "Gee, sure don't seem all that rubbery to me."
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.
Wow, just when I though nobody could make JR look like he can anything more than an average I.Q., you let this load of stupid tumble out of your mouth.Dancing Mustard wrote:YEAH1!!11!!1!!!! LOOK AT MY FUCKING BICEPS MAN!!!! I WOULD HAVE U TOTALLY HARDCORE BEAT TO A MOTHERRFUCKING PULP1!!!!! YEAAAAAHHHH!!!! GO TEAM!!!!Jenos Ridan wrote:"I'm rubber, you're glue" BLAH BLAH BLAH. You are the sort of twit that I'd have socked in the mouth just as soon as glue tumbled out. To which I'd say, "Gee, sure don't seem all that rubbery to me."
JUST BECAUSE I DON'T HAZ TEH LOGIC DOEN'T MEEN THAT I DON'T WIN TEH THRED BECAUSE I WOULDJUST HAVE LYKE PWNED U BIG FUKING STYLE IN REEL LYFE!!!!112111!!! WHICH IS WINNING!!!111!
Wayne wrote:Wow, with a voice like that Dancing Mustard must get all the babes!
Garth wrote:Yeah, I bet he's totally studly and buff.