Moderator: Cartographers

Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
What he means, is "Post a small image. If that looks fine, I'll give you a stamp"gimil wrote:Can I get a sample of the small version please pep? To ensure their is no resize issues>?

The 88 tests done earlier show that circles are not necessary and that everything fits fine and is legible.The Neon Peon wrote:You need to start thinking about army circles. These impact the graphics a lot, and you might need to move one or two territory names to fit one in nicely. You will be fine on most territories but I doubt that something like Karlsruhe will do well with one the way it is now.
I don't think army circles will be necessary on this map... I didn't put one on this page, but take a look at page 13 and you can see an example of army #'s on the map. I tried to make the continent colors not too saturated so circles wouldn't be needed. But any suggestions on the colors are still appreciated.The Neon Peon wrote:You need to start thinking about army circles. These impact the graphics a lot, and you might need to move one or two territory names to fit one in nicely. You will be fine on most territories but I doubt that something like Karlsruhe will do well with one the way it is now.
Nice work on it so far.
You'll need some others' support if you want me to change the borders. I purposely made them so ahh... detailed; I'd call it more of a unique style I tried. Which I think works well for this map.DiM wrote:i see everyone is yelling quench so i hate to be the party pooper but i think the borders need to be redrawn. i mean they're to damn wobbly and from what i've seen on other maps they shouldn't be.
check this out:
http://www.mapsofworld.com/germany/germany-map.jpg
the borders are much more fluid much more cursive.
other than that i'd love to see the background flags be a bit more visible but that may impair the legibility of the map.
anyway i think there will be sorious problems with the army numbers on the small map in regions like Osnabruck or Munster.
btw does the rule with the small being 33% smaller than large still exist? cause that would make the small map on this one really frickin tiny. it would be something like 460*400![]()
![]()




Anarkistsdream wrote:If you guys can't tell that Doom is being forced to post this drivel, you are fools...
Ok thanks, I'll work on this stuff a bit more.iancanton wrote:i'd maybe like the water to be a bit more blue and a bit less purple and the emblem of baden-wurttemberg to be slightly more obvious on the small version but, even if u change nothing, it's a great-looking map!
ian.
I may pronounce the coats of arms on the minimap a bit more, I'll see how it looks.ga7 wrote:Sorry if this has been discussed already but just an idea... Why not make the emblems way more proeminent on the bonus map and remove them from the play map? It seems still barely visible and making them more apparent might impair playability, showing them well but only on the bonus map would make more sense IMO.
Top Score:2403natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
I agree that the yellows have the least contrast, and could do with some more.Optimus Prime wrote:I'm not sure what everyone else thinks, but you might think of making the contrast between the two yellow continents a little more apparent. They blend together pretty easy at the moment.
Sounds good - thanks guys.laci_mae wrote:I agree that the yellows have the least contrast, and could do with some more.Optimus Prime wrote:I'm not sure what everyone else thinks, but you might think of making the contrast between the two yellow continents a little more apparent. They blend together pretty easy at the moment.
Laci




