Ah eees-ok. We still love you inky-winkyInkL0sed wrote:Sorry about that
you can only do it if nobody's replied yet. But yes, it is a very cheap and stupid tactic to be legal.jonesthecurl wrote:I just rea the thread on deleting your prior post.
If its not cheating, I'm now deleting my post of Fri 14th at 12.40 am.
I think it should count as cheating however.
hence I've commemmorated the time of the post I'm deleting.
Oh durn, you can't do it now. hmmph.
Nevertheless the earlier one was still 73 hours 53.

Nope, it just forces everyone else to be on their toes. If someone else posts, then the whole advantage is taken away, and your bump has turned to nothing.Ditocoaf wrote:you can only do it if nobody's replied yet. But yes, it is a very cheap and stupid tactic to be legal.jonesthecurl wrote:I just rea the thread on deleting your prior post.
If its not cheating, I'm now deleting my post of Fri 14th at 12.40 am.
I think it should count as cheating however.
hence I've commemmorated the time of the post I'm deleting.
Oh durn, you can't do it now. hmmph.
Nevertheless the earlier one was still 73 hours 53.
YOU HEAR THAT, INK? YOU'RE BEING THE TWILL OF THE BUMP GAME!
heheheh


Napoleon Ier wrote:You people need to grow up to be honest.
Perhaps we should instigate a double-bump rule? Each bump should be double-bumped, in order to prevent such flagrant fiddling....jonesthecurl wrote:haha i did that delete repost thing. ho-ho.
If anyone's listening...

Mr_Adams wrote:You, sir, are an idiot.
Timminz wrote:By that logic, you eat babies.
i don't think anyone's keeping score any more are they?spurgistan wrote:Double-bump blocker post. Just to be safe.