Moderator: Community Team
Thanks CrazyAnglican.CrazyAnglican wrote:Certainly,
sorry ditocoaf
You had this weird belief that some people can't behave civilly when they are asked to do it. I proved you wrong. You and the others responded by kicking out everyone who just happened to share a clan with me.CrazyAnglican wrote:Actually there was no destruction, internal or otherwise. I said attempted destruction. Prove a point? Sure one small group has "proven" that they will go to great lengths in the attempt to insure that nobody sets a rule that they disagree with (mind you they can set or break any rule they like). There was no point; only a flimsy excuse. An outside member of the group stated clearly "this forum will be dead in a month" when it wasn't he used a members username and password to come inside and gripe about or admissions standards. As if turning our callouts thread into a bitchfest (to the point that it was shut down) wasn't enough.
that should have been a PM.Snorri1234 wrote:You had this weird belief that some people can't behave civilly when they are asked to do it. I proved you wrong. You and the others responded by kicking out everyone who just happened to share a clan with me.CrazyAnglican wrote:Actually there was no destruction, internal or otherwise. I said attempted destruction. Prove a point? Sure one small group has "proven" that they will go to great lengths in the attempt to insure that nobody sets a rule that they disagree with (mind you they can set or break any rule they like). There was no point; only a flimsy excuse. An outside member of the group stated clearly "this forum will be dead in a month" when it wasn't he used a members username and password to come inside and gripe about or admissions standards. As if turning our callouts thread into a bitchfest (to the point that it was shut down) wasn't enough.
Have fun agreeing in your subforum.

natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"
Sorry, john9blue, but this is still derailing the thread. I wanted people to take the argument outside of this thread; his brief apology wasn't off-topic, but your and snorri's comments just were.john9blue wrote:So Dito asked you to behave civilly by taking this to PM's, and you ignored him and posted here instead. Ironic, no?

natty_dread wrote:Do ponies have sex?
(proud member of the Occasionally Wrongly Banned)Army of GOD wrote:the term heterosexual is offensive. I prefer to be called "normal"


Still no word...Snorri1234 wrote:How is the progress?

jay_a2j wrote:hey if any1 would like me to make them a signature or like an avator just let me no, my sig below i did, and i also did "panther 88" so i can do something like that for u if ud like...
Yess! Let's get this party (er, reasoned discussion) started!samuelc812 wrote:The forum has been created
Perfect! Could you do me a favor and request entry from the Usergroups page on your control panel? I'd like to test out how that works.pimpdave wrote:Oh hey, I'll join.

Not yet. I'll maybe join next week or so.Ditocoaf wrote:Still no word...Snorri1234 wrote:How is the progress?
wait, and did you ever actually ask to sign up?
I'm curious ... sign me up.The only requirements are:
1) A real desire to discuss important and/or interesting issues.
2) A promise to remain civil and avoid insults and ad-hoc arguments at all times within the clan.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
That debate is even more hopeless than scoring system reform.MeDeFe wrote:*knock knock* (No, I'm not setting you up for a joke)
I really don't want to miss the revived Creationism vs. Evolution debate sponsored by WM, so can I join? I already applied.