Moderator: Community Team
@Dunc -- that's the reason I'm voting him too. I've since dropped the daykiller issueStroop wrote:Ani's reaction to only one vote is not a lead?F1fth wrote:The better question is why not? Unless he's on your side of course...Natewolfman wrote:I agree who we lynch is very relivent... im not voting yet as i have not seen a good reason to lynch anyone given yet... and at what PCM said, why are we voting for Stroop? i dont remember reading anything that marks him as a killer, unless i missed something?
But as for a reason to at least get a claim out of him, how about because we have no other leads, and if we let this go we'll have nothing else to do.
I think I'll claim then. I am a Kroot, a Tau Goon.
No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
Thanks f1fth, i was about to ask about this tau business. Also Stroop, sorry dude but, vote stroopStroop wrote:No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
Im pretty sure you are Tau aswell.drake_259 wrote:Vote: F1fth
You are not in my fraction and you seem to be very onwards with this lynch,
Bullshit how, exactly? You are the only claimed member of a faction right now. I'm not tau, so I am fine with lynching you.Stroop wrote:No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
So are you saying we should lynch the members of dying factions with top priority, so the entire faction has no night kill?F1fth wrote:He said he was a goon. Goon as in member of a mafia. Members of a mafia always have a kill as long as one of them remains.
Well, it's a tough decision. On one hand, eliminating an entire faction would remove one NK we have each night so it would be good to target the last person. On the other, we can't allow any faction to become too powerful, so it's also necessary to take out the groups with the most number of people./ wrote:So are you saying we should lynch the members of dying factions with top priority, so the entire faction has no night kill?F1fth wrote:He said he was a goon. Goon as in member of a mafia. Members of a mafia always have a kill as long as one of them remains.
thats a very good point...dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
That's an interesting idea, actually. What do others think about this idea?Natewolfman wrote:thats a very good point...dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
as ive been thinking, there are three ways to play this
1) eliminate a whole group which was suggested
2) even out the groups, in other words groups that havnt lost anyone yet is who we should go for, or make sure we take 2 from every group evenly
3) try and take out the docs and the 'town' type players before they bandwagon with a specfic group, and gives that group absolute power
I say no.dunc_2007 wrote:That's an interesting idea, actually. What do others think about this idea?Natewolfman wrote:thats a very good point...dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
as ive been thinking, there are three ways to play this
1) eliminate a whole group which was suggested
2) even out the groups, in other words groups that havnt lost anyone yet is who we should go for, or make sure we take 2 from every group evenly
3) try and take out the docs and the 'town' type players before they bandwagon with a specfic group, and gives that group absolute power
You would say that, being that you did claim doc and all.animorpherv1 wrote:I say no.dunc_2007 wrote:That's an interesting idea, actually. What do others think about this idea?Natewolfman wrote:thats a very good point...dunc_2007 wrote:I think we should definitely weaken the strongest factions as best as we can. Otherwise, the second one faction begins to pull ahead, all these unaffiliated doctors we keep hearing so much about will hop on board with them, and glide into victory.
as ive been thinking, there are three ways to play this
1) eliminate a whole group which was suggested
2) even out the groups, in other words groups that havnt lost anyone yet is who we should go for, or make sure we take 2 from every group evenly
3) try and take out the docs and the 'town' type players before they bandwagon with a specfic group, and gives that group absolute power
I promise I will not choose a side, as I have no clue who is on what side, or what side is winnig, because I never heard of Dwan of War untill the game was announced.
Actually, that's a very good reason.Stroop wrote:No, it's an absolute bullshit reason as you can advocate anyone's lynch with that. You want me lynched, specifically, so stop using such reasons...F1fth wrote:@Nate -- a Tau is a faction and they are not more dangerous, but equally dangerous. You people need to get this through your heads: IF THEY ARE NOT IN YOUR FACTION, WHETHER YOU BE THIRD PARTY OR FACTION, THEY NEED TO KILL YOU TO WIN AND YOU NEED TO SEE THEM KILLED TO WIN. Is that not reason enough?
aage wrote:Never trust CYOC or pancake.
