drewclark [busted]

[timmytuttut88]

drewclark has already been busted. Regardless whether this account was abandoned or not, if enough evidence points to being a multi, it will get busted with the accounts involved.

Bullshit. Diddle had been busted before for multis and he upgraded to premium. He hasn't used this account since he was last busted and it's no fair to say:

I'm going to bust all of your accounts except one and so I can bust you AGAIN and take your 25 dollars.

Just becaue you guys couldn't originally find the account, doesn't mean he should suffer for it.

[king achilles]

He was busted in the past before the drewclark account was created.

[timmytuttut88]

He was busted in the past before the drewclark account was created.

Yes and he made this account and he thought it had already been busted when he upgraded back to premium. He had thought this account had been busted long ago and had no idea he would get busted again for an account he hadn't used in a long time.

It should either be counted as:

•the last bust because he upgraded to premium BEFORE he had been bustede
•irrelevant because he upgraded to permium before the case happened
•or he should be given a refund because this is very unfair to the customer

[king achilles]

•the last bust because he upgraded to premium BEFORE he had been bustede
- he was busted for having multi accounts in the past and he was not premium back then and drewclark was not yet created. We didn't leave this one out.

•irrelevant because he upgraded to permium before the case happened
- upgrading into premium does not excuse you for not being a multi with another account.

•or he should be given a refund because this is very unfair to the customer
- a multi account will be accountable for his actions even if he is able to upgrade into a premium before he is busted or caught.

[GrimReaper.]

i think you shouldn't because they are from two seperate countrys.
however he could have masked his ip address using a ghost dive and then Piggybacking it around the world through servers using a program u can buy from best buy or lovo can be really smart

i like my idea better

[timmytuttut88]

•the last bust because he upgraded to premium BEFORE he had been bustede
- he was busted for having multi accounts in the past and he was not premium back then and drewclark was not yet created. We didn't leave this one out.

•irrelevant because he upgraded to permium before the case happened
- upgrading into premium does not excuse you for not being a multi with another account.

•or he should be given a refund because this is very unfair to the customer
- a multi account will be accountable for his actions even if he is able to upgrade into a premium before he is busted or caught.

You do know that he hadn't used the account since he last got busted? He already thought it was busted. No offense King, but thise is what I think is going on:

Diddle gets busted for multis, but one is left unbusted because you guys are going to bust him later and steal his 25$. His account hadn't been uesd since he upgraded to premium because he had thought the account was already disabled! If he knew the multi was about to be caught then he never would have upgraded to premium right before he got busted.

I think that you guys should refund him though since he owned premium for such a short time and it really is unfair that he was busted for something that happened long before he bought premium....

[lancehoch]

You do know that he hadn't used the account since he last got busted? He already thought it was busted. No offense King, but thise is what I think is going on:

Diddle gets busted for multis, but one is left unbusted because you guys are going to bust him later and steal his 25$. His account hadn't been uesd since he upgraded to premium because he had thought the account was already disabled! If he knew the multi was about to be caught then he never would have upgraded to premium right before he got busted.

I think that you guys should refund him though since he owned premium for such a short time and it really is unfair that he was busted for something that happened long before he bought premium....

timmy, that is not the case. He was busted back in September. After that bust he then created the drewclark account. Then, after he created the new account, he bought premium on the diddle account. This is the first time he has been busted since early September.

[nagerous]

You do know that he hadn't used the account since he last got busted? He already thought it was busted. No offense King, but thise is what I think is going on:

Diddle gets busted for multis, but one is left unbusted because you guys are going to bust him later and steal his 25$. His account hadn't been uesd since he upgraded to premium because he had thought the account was already disabled! If he knew the multi was about to be caught then he never would have upgraded to premium right before he got busted.

I think that you guys should refund him though since he owned premium for such a short time and it really is unfair that he was busted for something that happened long before he bought premium....

timmy, that is not the case. He was busted back in September. After that bust he then created the drewclark account. Then, after he created the new account, he bought premium on the diddle account. This is the first time he has been busted since early September.

Couldn't that be construed as slightly unfair though that his premium is taken away for sins made before he got the premium?

[timmytuttut88]

You do know that he hadn't used the account since he last got busted? He already thought it was busted. No offense King, but thise is what I think is going on:

Diddle gets busted for multis, but one is left unbusted because you guys are going to bust him later and steal his 25$. His account hadn't been uesd since he upgraded to premium because he had thought the account was already disabled! If he knew the multi was about to be caught then he never would have upgraded to premium right before he got busted.

I think that you guys should refund him though since he owned premium for such a short time and it really is unfair that he was busted for something that happened long before he bought premium....

timmy, that is not the case. He was busted back in September. After that bust he then created the drewclark account. Then, after he created the new account, he bought premium on the diddle account. This is the first time he has been busted since early September.

Yes, but he thought this account had been busted long before. You should at least give him his 25 dollars back because he upgraded his account long after this whole thing had started. Beside, how was he supposed to know this account wasn't busted? It's no fair for him to get busted right after upgrading to premium for an account that he had abandon months ago. All I ask is that you at least refund him the 25$. This is hardly fair.

[Night Strike]

lance and KA can't refund anything, so diddle is going to have to submit an e-ticket to have the situation reviewed.

[timmytuttut88]

lance and KA can't refund anything, so diddle is going to have to submit an e-ticket to have the situation reviewed.

He's tried that and he didn't get an answer.

[lancehoch]

timmy, that is not the case. He was busted back in September. After that bust he then created the drewclark account. Then, after he created the new account, he bought premium on the diddle account. This is the first time he has been busted since early September.

Yes, but he thought this account had been busted long before.

You get an email when you are busted. He never got an email for that account. If he cannot keep the multiple accounts straight, that is his problem. He broke Rule #1 (there are only two of those, not hard to keep track of them). Also, if he were busted, he would not have been able to join games or post in the forum.

You should at least give him his 25 dollars back because he upgraded his account long after this whole thing had started.

So, whenever someone creates a multi and has paid for premium, then gets busted, they should get their money back? That does not make sense. Why is he special?

Beside, how was he supposed to know this account wasn't busted?

You would not know, but an email is sent. It says who you have been busted with. Also, if he tried to make a new game or make a post it would have let him, since he was not busted.

It's no fair for him to get busted right after upgrading to premium for an account that he had abandon months ago. All I ask is that you at least refund him the 25$. This is hardly fair.

He did not abandon the account. He might not have been posting or playing games, but the account was in no way abandoned.

[wcaclimbing]

It's no fair for him to get busted right after upgrading to premium for an account that he had abandon months ago. All I ask is that you at least refund him the 25$. This is hardly fair.

He did not abandon the account. He might not have been posting or playing games, but the account was in no way abandoned.

could you explain how someone abandons an account, then? It seems like "accidentally logged in, logged right back out" should still be allowed under 'abandoned' without anyone getting busted.

[timmytuttut88]

You should at least give him his 25 dollars back because he upgraded his account long after this whole thing had started.

So, whenever someone creates a multi and has paid for premium, then gets busted, they should get their money back? That does not make sense. Why is he special?

Because this multi had been abandon back in october. Before he upgraded to premium. He could have just waited until this account got busted and then upgraded to premium, but he had thought it had already been caught. Beside, he had this premium for less then a month and he was caught with an account he hadn't used since october. Don't you think you should give him his money back because it's not fair to take away his premium that he got after this case had started.

It's no fair for him to get busted right after upgrading to premium for an account that he had abandon months ago. All I ask is that you at least refund him the 25$. This is hardly fair.

He did not abandon the account. He might not have been posting or playing games, but the account was in no way abandoned.

That's where you're wrong. This is probably why you guys were against me. This account hadn't been used since october. He signed into it on accident once because firefox remembers passwords. Give me one game, post, or pm he sent on this account. That will convince me this account was active.

The thing that bothers me the most about this is that Diddle hasn't made a multi since he upgraded to premium and yet his premium is still being taken away.

[Timminz]

Anyone arguing so much, on behalf of a busted multi, should probably have a quick check done on their account(s).

The same as I would argue for the rights of someone arrested for smoking pot.

[mpjh]

You probably loved Joe McCarthy.

In fact, your logic is exactly the logic used by lawyers in the Soviet Union for NOT defending their clients.

[Timminz]

You probably loved Joe McCarthy.

In fact, your logic is exactly the logic used by lawyers in the Soviet Union for NOT defending their clients.

Your analogy is weak. timmy is not a lawyer, and diddle has already been "convicted".

[mpjh]

All true, but the logic is timeless, "Don't speak for they may get you too."

It is guilt by association plain and simple.

[Timminz]

All true, but the logic is timeless, "Don't speak for they may get you too."

It is guilt by association plain and simple.

Close. You seem to think that I implied that he should be banned forthwith. What is the harm in a quick check? Do you know something that I don't?

[mpjh]

You know exactly what I mean. You would have flourished in the good old CCCP.

[Timminz]

You know exactly what I mean. You would have flourished in the good old CCCP.

Carry on with your exaggerations. I'm off for Christmas.

[mpjh]

Happy Xmas.