Moderator: Community Team
Hard to tell from the scene but Id guess mafia.spiesr wrote:So, somebody succeeded last night. But since it was either a doc or sheep (who is dead) I don't think we can learn much from that. Is there anyway to tell if it was the mafia or werewolfs who killed last night?
As other people were pointing out its better to get a lynch before the deadline even if you don't have sufficient evidence as this allows you more information to go on day 2.Natewolfman wrote:thats a reach, I never talk much on day 1 of anything (look at the other games im in) I mostly just vote and unvote, dont look to deep into it
but now that we have had a death, things are actually discussable
anyways if you wana know i unvoted because i had voted for drake (I think?) and it was a random vote, he had like 2 others after me so i took it off since i didnt want to accidently aid in that lynch, simple as that, however I didnt have sufficient evidence to condem ani either, so take that as you may
Really? It sounds like a werewolf kill to me-blood on the walls, floor and ceiling! A little too messy to be a mafia kill if you ask me.pmchugh wrote:Hard to tell from the scene but Id guess mafia.spiesr wrote:So, somebody succeeded last night. But since it was either a doc or sheep (who is dead) I don't think we can learn much from that. Is there anyway to tell if it was the mafia or werewolfs who killed last night?
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
DoomYoshi wrote:Test it on me. Tree stump is my favorite role anyway lol. Next time I am picking Wispy Woods as my character.
Thought I'd just say: there's no information hidden in the scenes.dunc_2007 wrote:Really? It sounds like a werewolf kill to me-blood on the walls, floor and ceiling! A little too messy to be a mafia kill if you ask me.pmchugh wrote:Hard to tell from the scene but Id guess mafia.spiesr wrote:So, somebody succeeded last night. But since it was either a doc or sheep (who is dead) I don't think we can learn much from that. Is there anyway to tell if it was the mafia or werewolfs who killed last night?
After reading Stroop's last post, I'm pretty sure there's no way to tell if it was the mafia or the werewolfs. I don't think it matters that much really which of them made the kill, what's important is that either they both targeted sheep (I don't think sheep was a very obvious target, so I doubt this) or one of them failed their kill.spiesr wrote:So, somebody succeeded last night. But since it was either a doc or sheep (who is dead) I don't think we can learn much from that. Is there anyway to tell if it was the mafia or werewolfs who killed last night?
Please quote the things you disagree with and explain why you disagree with me on those things. I think it would make for a useful discussion.pmchugh wrote:Rereading yesterday I remembered how good SL is but I disagree with one or two things you said, hey no-ones perfect![]()
You're replacing ace, who was on top of my scum-list yesterday (and still is, meaning you still are). I really can't accept "but ace always looks like scum" as a reasonable argument. My suspicions of you have been raised even more with the revelation that sheep was a roleblocker and the fact that there was only one kill last night. It might have been a doc, or even a double-kill, but there's a decent chance that sheep prevented a kill. Now think about who he would target: he voted ace yesterday. I admit this is mostly speculation, but it sure as hell is not making you look more pro-town. I'm not condemning you on forehand though. You state some valid suspicions which are worth looking into also:pmchugh wrote:Please dont suspect me on yesterdays actions, as someone kindly pointed out ace looks like scum no matter what side he is on.
I don't blame LSU for not unvoting. If I recall correctly, I didn't unvote him myself and I stand by that decision. Your suspicion on Natewolfman is more interesting. I read back to see what he posted yesterday; that cost about 5 seconds. His unvote, apparently without any intention of reaching a lynch or even stating his current suspicions (which is something most people would want to get out before night, in case they die), is scummy indeed.pmchugh wrote:My main suspect currently:
Natewolfman- Gut feeling, he was mainly quite but something struck me as off about him, hes been almost too quite just trying to blend in. Also the way he merely unvoted with an approaching deadline was suspicious a no lynch benifits scum.
And LSU why didn't you unvote drake after his near claim?
Natewolfman wrote:thats a reach, I never talk much on day 1 of anything (look at the other games im in) I mostly just vote and unvote, dont look to deep into it
but now that we have had a death, things are actually discussable
![]()
You will never have evidence on anyone on Day 1 of any game. What you need is suspicions, nothing more. How does ani come into this? I find it hard to believe you suspected him, because you never mentioned him before this post. You said yourself that the game is "actually discussable" now, so please go ahead and start discussing. Who do you think is most likely scum? And second-likely? And why?Natewolfman wrote:anyways if you wana know i unvoted because i had voted for drake (I think?) and it was a random vote, he had like 2 others after me so i took it off since i didnt want to accidently aid in that lynch, simple as that, however I didnt have sufficient evidence to condem ani either, so take that as you may

Ok heres one:SL wrote: Please quote the things you disagree with and explain why you disagree with me on those things. I think it would make for a useful discussion.
I disagree with this. If you are a townie power role who has claimed what is wrong with asking the doc to protect you. Even if the doc doesn't protect you the mafia are unlikely to target you in case he has, yes scum could use this against you but their is nothing wrong with town doing it either IMO.Sierra_Leon wrote: Drake & everyone else: please never ever try to direct a doc, vig, cop, or any other power role. It's safe to assume the people playing those roles have a mind of their own and can come to these conclusions themselves. Trying to manipulate their actions is something scum would tend to do and I consider it a scumtell.
Fair enough but I can't exactly defend annything from yesterday as I wasn't playing, ace isnt the best player in the world and didn't exactly help my (or your) cause. As for the one kill thing there isn't much I can say, excpet I wasn't blocked.SL wrote: You're replacing ace, who was on top of my scum-list yesterday (and still is, meaning you still are). I really can't accept "but ace always looks like scum" as a reasonable argument. My suspicions of you have been raised even more with the revelation that sheep was a roleblocker and the fact that there was only one kill last night. It might have been a doc, or even a double-kill, but there's a decent chance that sheep prevented a kill. Now think about who he would target: he voted ace yesterday. I admit this is mostly speculation, but it sure as hell is not making you look more pro-town. I'm not condemning you on forehand though. You state some valid suspicions which are worth looking into also:
Is there anything you can give to us from what he said to being fake?spiesr wrote:Here is the info: switch is an idiot.
Day 1 random vote.switchblade wrote:vote Sierra_Leon for coming up with a good reason to lynch someone.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Gets on the drake bandwagon after drake claimed. I'm not really sure why he didn't believe the claim.switchblade wrote:unvote vote drake_259
sorry for missing awhile. got a new computer today.
Says something worthless. Pathetic attempt at a joke?switchblade wrote:Maybe i voted for Drake because i am a werewolf...
He says he was hiding clues. I don't know what he considers a clue but I don't see one.switchblade wrote:no, im not, but there was a hint hidden deep within my words.dunc_2007 wrote:Really? Are you claiming to be a werewolf?
Hmm Im not sure about this it doesnt really add up.speisr wrote:He says he was hiding clues. I don't know what he considers a clue but I don't see one.switchblade wrote:no, im not, but there was a hint hidden deep within my words.dunc_2007 wrote:Really? Are you claiming to be a werewolf?
My overall conclusion is that is actions stem from his inexperience causing him to conclude from his own role that there is no wolfsbane. I would not agree with his assessment however.
OK but this feels like im defending someone else not myself.spiesr wrote:pmchugh would you care to do something similar and try to explain your past self's actions?
Day 1 Random Vote.ace1217 wrote:Vote ani because he can morph! We bagged a werewolf, easy!
Bandwaggoning, Drake looked suspicious this was before his claim or half claim. Seems reasonable at this point all though asI said it seems a bit bandwaggony to me.ace1217 wrote:Going to have to vote drake
He unvotes after the half claim because he is probably suspecting bomb or something along those lines. This seems sensible to me.ace1217 wrote:Unvote because I think I know what your hinting at.
This seems strange after drake refuses to reveal his role he goes back on what he said previously, or perhaps now he said he wasnt a bomb he didn't believe him anymore. Chances are he got swayed by the more experienced players.ace1217 wrote:Vote drake
Sierra_Leon wrote:Your suspicion on Natewolfman is more interesting. I read back to see what he posted yesterday; that cost about 5 seconds. His unvote, apparently without any intention of reaching a lynch or even stating his current suspicions (which is something most people would want to get out before night, in case they die), is scummy indeed.pmchugh wrote:My main suspect currently:
Natewolfman- Gut feeling, he was mainly quite but something struck me as off about him, hes been almost too quite just trying to blend in. Also the way he merely unvoted with an approaching deadline was suspicious a no lynch benifits scum.
Natewolfman wrote:thats a reach, I never talk much on day 1 of anything (look at the other games im in) I mostly just vote and unvote, dont look to deep into it
but now that we have had a death, things are actually discussable
![]()
People who always act scummy (even on purpose) deserve to be lynched for it. This is the same argument pmchugh tried to use just now to explain ace's day 1 behaviour, and it's not an acceptable excuse.
You will never have evidence on anyone on Day 1 of any game. What you need is suspicions, nothing more. How does ani come into this? I find it hard to believe you suspected him, because you never mentioned him before this post. You said yourself that the game is "actually discussable" now, so please go ahead and start discussing. Who do you think is most likely scum? And second-likely? And why?Natewolfman wrote:anyways if you wana know i unvoted because i had voted for drake (I think?) and it was a random vote, he had like 2 others after me so i took it off since i didnt want to accidently aid in that lynch, simple as that, however I didnt have sufficient evidence to condem ani either, so take that as you may
Finally, FOS sam_levi_11 for reacting to a town death. That's a scumtell.
Care to respond to this sam_levi_11?Sierra_Leon wrote:Finally, FOS sam_levi_11 for reacting to a town death. That's a scumtell.