Moderator: Community Team
How much have you donated to the cause to save your precious buildings? I am sure that if they are that cherished, the religions behind them will take up collections/endowments/donations to save them. I am also sure that were it an ancient MOSQUE being saved with your tax dollars, you would have paragraphs of verbose venom to spew about it.Napoleon Ier wrote:This whilst the pearls of our heritage, wonders of Gothic architecture, are left to crumble under pretext that thy qualify as "religious" buildings and hence can't be maintained using PUBLIC funds (imagine the gall of demanding they should be! bah...).
Actually, I suspect you fit in only with those of a similar ilk. You surround yourself only with those who believe as you do and detest those that don't. You rarely, if ever go to the "big city" because what you see there disgusts you. Anyone of wealth is a fat-cat robber baron, anyone with a earring is a tranny-fag and those of different races are invaders and freeloaders and you loathe them all. Only you are right, only you are just, only you are righteous.Napoleon Ier wrote:I don't know what community you imagine I'd fit into from the perspective of you and your sandal-wearing community of decapacitated hippies, but I know where I do here.
Nope. You definitely don't. It is also clear that you hate anyone who is not also a backwoods sheep herder. Why do you hate everyone so much simply because they aren't like you?Napoleon Ier wrote:I know may not fit in with the trendy metrosexual yuppie crowd at the local yoga club, maybe not with the quasi-permanently (m)ethylically comatose gangstas with trackie bottoms around their mid-thigh, maybe not with the flatulent political élite.
As do we all.Napoleon Ier wrote:I do know many who are honest, hard-working, family men struggling under oppressive taxes to make a decent living,
No surprise there. I work with few muslims, but that's about it. It would probably surprise you to find that ALL are "honest, hard-working, family men struggling under oppressive taxes to make a decent living". But you probably don't believe it or care...simply because they are muslims.Napoleon Ier wrote:No, maybe I don't know many friends who are muslim, transvestite or literally want to ban Christmas
Nobody is a racist for loving their country, nor do I believe ANYONE has been called such simply for doing so.Napoleon Ier wrote:who are tired of being told they're racist for loving their country,
Yes, yes, yes...we know all about your feelings toward anyone not from your tiny hamlet. You sound like some in my country as well. That all poor are poor by choice, only lazy good-for-nothing addicts are on public assistance. Frankly, it's tired rhetoric.Napoleon Ier wrote:tired of their hard-earned wages going toward paying for cable TVs for the gangsta's who mugged them on their way home from work and weren't pursued because some rubber-stamping bureaucrats diverted resources from the police to fund council houses for this scum to live in, from where they can set up drug-dens.....<typical rant SNIP>
Huh? OK...please explain how your family was "not allowed" to celebrate Christmas.Napoleon Ier wrote:And when they want to celebrate a traditional, religious Christmas with their family, no they can't, because do-gooder Mr. Fixit like you look on in horror at the notion that this might offend the lovely diversity-bringing communities we're so lucky to have.
It always amazes me up how you know us so well...how did you know I was posting from a giant "council house"? (whatever the f*ck THAT is!)Napoleon Ier wrote:Now, maybe the socialist utopic world that you and your leftist buddies have created, with council houses stretching out as far as the eye can see, and anyone who tries to put in an honest day's work getting savaged for having the bloody cheek to try and actually shock-horror improve things for him and his family.
Napoleon Ier wrote:I know, know. You'll dismiss this all with a throwaway "omg fairy tale believer" or "wacist!!111!!ONE!!limx-->0sin(x)/x!1!" comment followed by a smiley, but deep down, you'll feel guilt at the profound f*ck-up your generation have achieved.
A simple question. Try to answer it simply...if you can.Napoleon Ier wrote:Yes Juan, I'm 100% serious: I love Christmas and I'm not letting politically correct chumps like you ruin it because your poor feeble leftist's sensibilities are offended.

are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.

pancakemix wrote:Quirk, you are a bastard. That is all.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Alright, but be very liberal with the insults like "poor" and "feeble" since my side is winning, lol.Napoleon Ier wrote:Yes Juan, I'm 100% serious: I love Christmas and I'm not letting politically correct chumps like you ruin it because your poor feeble leftist's sensibilities are offended.
So what? It is better than not knowing nothing about politics at all like many teenagers do today and that's a fact, many teenagers in this country don't even know who the priminister is, they even mistaked David Cameron for being Tony Blair, and this was when Gordon Brown was in power too, so Nappy taking a interest in politics and you not agreeing with him is much better than him being some small minded idiot knowing nothing about the world he lives in.radiojake wrote:and still only 16....
I wonder what Nappy's Dad/Mum/Grandparents/Gaurdian (whatever the situation is) has been vomiting down his ear his whole life... There is a fine line between the nationalism of loving ones country and the nationalism of hating everything else that is different.
There's a difference between Blair and Cameron?brooksieb wrote:So what? It is better than not knowing nothing about politics at all like many teenagers do today and that's a fact, many teenagers in this country don't even know who the priminister is, they even mistaked David Cameron for being Tony Blair, and this was when Gordon Brown was in power too, so Nappy taking a interest in politics and you not agreeing with him is much better than him being some small minded idiot knowing nothing about the world he lives in.radiojake wrote:and still only 16....
I wonder what Nappy's Dad/Mum/Grandparents/Gaurdian (whatever the situation is) has been vomiting down his ear his whole life... There is a fine line between the nationalism of loving ones country and the nationalism of hating everything else that is different.
Huh... that's funny, there's this Australian kid I've heard of called Jake-something-or-rather who pretty much fits that description...brooksieb wrote:So what? It is better than not knowing nothing about politics at all like many teenagers do today and that's a fact, many teenagers in this country don't even know who the priminister is, they even mistaked David Cameron for being Tony Blair, and this was when Gordon Brown was in power too, so Nappy taking a interest in politics and you not agreeing with him is much better than him being some small minded idiot knowing nothing about the world he lives in.radiojake wrote:and still only 16....
I wonder what Nappy's Dad/Mum/Grandparents/Gaurdian (whatever the situation is) has been vomiting down his ear his whole life... There is a fine line between the nationalism of loving ones country and the nationalism of hating everything else that is different.
I agree with you, brooksie. Politics is for everyone, not just politicians (despite what spineless atheletes spit out when asked why they are still going ahead with a Zimbabwean Cricket tour..) and I wish I was interested in politics when I was 16 (unfortunatly, it didn't interest me at the time) - My point earlier is that Nappy's politics seem quite dangerous, considering how young he is, and how agressive he seems to be. That's what I have a problem with.brooksieb wrote:So what? It is better than not knowing nothing about politics at all like many teenagers do today and that's a fact, many teenagers in this country don't even know who the priminister is, they even mistaked David Cameron for being Tony Blair, and this was when Gordon Brown was in power too, so Nappy taking a interest in politics and you not agreeing with him is much better than him being some small minded idiot knowing nothing about the world he lives in.radiojake wrote:and still only 16....
I wonder what Nappy's Dad/Mum/Grandparents/Gaurdian (whatever the situation is) has been vomiting down his ear his whole life... There is a fine line between the nationalism of loving ones country and the nationalism of hating everything else that is different.
Come on Nappy.. you're not even trying anymore.Napoleon Ier wrote:Huh... that's funny, there's this Australian kid I've heard of called Jake-something-or-rather who pretty much fits that description...brooksieb wrote:some small minded idiot knowing nothing about the world he lives in.
I'm sorry, but, err, what? My politics are dangerous?radiojake wrote:I agree with you, brooksie. Politics is for everyone, not just politicians (despite what spineless atheletes spit out when asked why they are still going ahead with a Zimbabwean Cricket tour..) and I wish I was interested in politics when I was 16 (unfortunatly, it didn't interest me at the time) - My point earlier is that Nappy's politics seem quite dangerous, considering how young he is, and how agressive he seems to be. That's what I have a problem with.brooksieb wrote:So what? It is better than not knowing nothing about politics at all like many teenagers do today and that's a fact, many teenagers in this country don't even know who the priminister is, they even mistaked David Cameron for being Tony Blair, and this was when Gordon Brown was in power too, so Nappy taking a interest in politics and you not agreeing with him is much better than him being some small minded idiot knowing nothing about the world he lives in.radiojake wrote:and still only 16....
I wonder what Nappy's Dad/Mum/Grandparents/Gaurdian (whatever the situation is) has been vomiting down his ear his whole life... There is a fine line between the nationalism of loving ones country and the nationalism of hating everything else that is different.
Napoleon Ier wrote:
I'm sorry, but don't you want to ban private property and make us all live in communes where we bathe once a month and interbreed with ethnic people at random intervals?
QFT!, i can't stress the importance of overbreeding, especially in developing countries where they have 6 children and expect us to donate to them, and alot of them would be malnourashed as it is, as for the rest i'm not getting involved in, though i have my opinions about it which i'm guessing alot of people on here would actively disagree.radiojake wrote: Well actually, I'm against breeding of all types, as i think we're too overpopulated as it is.
brooksieb wrote:QFT!, i can't stress the importance of overbreeding, especially in developing countries where they have 6 children and expect us to donate to them, and alot of them would be malnourashed as it is, as for the rest i'm not getting involved in, though i have my opinions about it which i'm guessing alot of people on here would actively disagree.radiojake wrote: Well actually, I'm against breeding of all types, as i think we're too overpopulated as it is.
I fucking love the fact that you're talking about how colonialism was a good thing with just a few minor bad things.Napoleon Ier wrote:I qualified the Taliban as sub-human, and Islam as evil. I've never applied the comment to any racial group, and I challenge you to find evidence to the contrary.
As for French colonialism, let's not forget we brought them sewage, roads, ports and schools. Positive things... yes, there were mistakes made, but it is simply natural for a dominant culture to assume the position of adminstrator until it has civilized the lesser people. We did not force them to accept any beliefs, we converted them through the use of missionaries, not bayonets.
We cannot expect the rules and laws that apply to civilized society to be applied all at once to savages. Yes, there are moral laws, which were at times violated, but overall, Colonialism as a doctrine is justified, as was it's application during the Empire, even if occasional abuses occurred.
What is unacceptable is the destruction of our culture by mindless barbarians, and prostration before their every demand by our balless leaders.


are registered trademarks of Backglass Heavy Industries.You don't need a white flag to go oppress some black people.Backglass wrote:Do they keep the white flags in their back pockets or just use their shirts?