Moderator: Community Team
Twill clearly lays out why DaGip was given the 3-day vacation, and it was not because of the avatar being a picture of owen. I believe what happened is that he was vacationed for posting a flame, and THEN it was realized that the avatar was a flame as well. Because a mod could not PM him asking him to remove the avatar (which is the proper moderator procedure), Twill had to remove it himself. But it was removed for being a flame, not for being personal information.Twill wrote:(I did not ever ban gip for using your avatar, I put him on a vacation for flaming you in a separate instance and removed the avatar because it was a flame)
Eh, they are only one day bans so it's no that big of a deal...Night Strike wrote:timmy, I give you props for posting a thread that lays out a cohesive scenario and issue without immediate attacking Twill or the Team.
I'll edit the post.Night Strike wrote:Twill clearly lays out why DaGip was given the 3-day vacation, and it was not because of the avatar being a picture of owen. I believe what happened is that he was vacationed for posting a flame, and THEN it was realized that the avatar was a flame as well. Because a mod could not PM him asking him to remove the avatar (which is the proper moderator procedure), Twill had to remove it himself. But it was removed for being a flame, not for being personal information.
El Capitan X wrote:The people in flame wars just seem to get dimmer and dimmer. Seriously though, I love your style, always a good read.
Do you have proof that Owen has been using the actual image of another person in his sig? So far the only one of an actual person that is known of (at least known to me) is his own, and he is free to post that one wherever he wants.Twill wrote:I am also placing you on a 24 hour vacation for using other people's images in your banner.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
saxitoxin wrote:Your position is more complex than the federal tax code. As soon as I think I understand it, I find another index of cross-references, exceptions and amendments I have to apply.
Timminz wrote:Yo mama is so classless, she could be a Marxist utopia.
Let's not forget that anyone that posts YouTube links should be banned as well. YouTube has a plethora of links to all kinds of personal info and porn!Vace Cooper wrote:That was not cool. It was only 24 hours, and most of us didnt even care, some of us may not have even noticed. There are so many other people that should be banned right now for the same thing... Post a picture of yourself thread?.. there's a ton of people that should be banned too, right? NO! why arnt they banned? Because that would be stupid. I will change our signature, but I think it is complete nonsense.
Army of GOD wrote:This thread is now about my large penis

Vace Cooper wrote:I will change our signature, but I think it is complete nonsense.
Frigidus wrote:but now that it's become relatively popular it's suffered the usual downturn in coolness.
i wasn't in on that decision. i completely disagree... the black jesus has spoken...-0Juan_Bottom wrote:Vace Cooper wrote:I will change our signature, but I think it is complete nonsense.
And what the c*ck is this sh*t about? I wouldn't change it 'iffin I were you!

nah, i heard i was responsible for that too... silly me, asking questions brings it all down!!!..-0clapper011 wrote:no, not at all..that we can blame on certain other....individuals........
