Chipv, regardless of who made what decisions, you are now taking this project and running with it.chipv wrote:These tags were not my idea, you can dispute this with Coleman.cairnswk wrote:chipv wrote:Magnificent effort.
Ok, we're bound to have arguments over Naming confusion but please post any corrections here and / or additions when they come.
I am writing the new code for this to go into the database now so we'll get a good look soon. (Easy to edit after).
naming confusion....->My word you will. Especially from me. i just found this thread.
May i suggest that i accept that some of my maps (and others have naming confusion as you call it) however, because the word confusion has negative connotations, perhaps you would consider using "naming challenges".
If i wanted to be a real bad guy and "confuse" players with my difficult maps, then you could accuse me of being confusing, however, i prefer to "challenge" players to use their gray matter and think about some situations before they "jump in" the deep end.
Also the tags applied to your maps were clearly not my decision if you read the whole thread.
The same thing happened with complexity tags when you were extremely and unnecessarily rude to me.
I think you have made a very good point, though and I will change the tag.
If i have been rude to you, then i can say i am sorry and it wasn't meant that way, but i also found it very rude that decision appears to be made by people on this site with no consideration given to the map-makers; simply because people like yourself decide to do something (which is good in itself), but you don't bother to consult with anyone before making these gigantic decisions.
I made the maps, i put my time and effort into them, I think i deserve a say in what gets said about the map, and that doesn't appear to happen too often.
Thank you though, for considering the change to the tags.
Perhaps you'd like the discuss this with the rest of the community before taking the decision to make the change.
